Controlled transparency in workplace design: Balancing visual and acoustic interaction in office environments

Journal of Facilities Management

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 121-130

  Chigot, Pierre ^a  

^a Ecophon   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Acoustics; Annoyance; Space allocation; Transparency; Workplace design

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996635035     PISSN: 14725967     EISSN: 17410983     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14725960410808159     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Kristensen, P. T. (2002) ‘Panopticon Spaces’, in Arkitektur DK, Vol. 2, pp. 76-81.
2. Marans, R. and Spreckelmeyer, K. F. (1982) ‘Evaluating Open and Conventional Office Design’, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 333-351.
3. Galletti, J., quoted in ‘Offices: How About a Shift to Open Space’, Management, France, Vol. 5, pp. 72-75.
4. Van Meel, J. (2000) The European Office — Office Design and National Context, Rotterdam, 010 Publishers, pp. 41-42.
5. Raymond, S. and Cunliffe, R. (1997) Tomorrow’s Office, London, E&FN Spon
6. Duffy, F. (1997) The New Office, London, Conran Octopus.
7. SIS, Swedish Standards Institute (2001) Svensk Standard SS 02 52 68 — Byggakustik — ljudklassning av utrymmen i byggnader — vårdlokaler, undervisningslokaler, dag-och fritidshem, kontor och hotell, Stockholm.
8. SP, Swedish National Testing and Research Institute (1998) Test 98F3357AE, Borås, 07/ 12/1998
9. Nutt, B. and McLennan, P. (Eds) (2000) Facility Management: Risks and Opportunities, Oxford, Blackwell Science, pp. 165-173.