Academic publishing and open access

Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 365-377

  Mueller Langer, Frank ^a   Scheufen, Marc ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION AND COMPETITION   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996564161     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781781004876.00045     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Altman, Micah and Gary King (2007), ‘A proposed standard for the scholarly citation of quantitative data’, D-Lib Magazine, 13 (3/4), available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/altman/03altman.html (accessed 6 May 2013).
2. Anderson, Richard G., William H. Greene, Bruce D. McCullough and Hrishikesh D. Vinod (2008), ‘The role of data/code archives in the future of economic research’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 15, 99-119.
3. Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick and Frank Mueller-Langer (2013a), ‘Open access to data: an ideal professed but not practised’, RatSWD (German Data Forum) Working Paper Series No. 215, pp. 1-10.
4. Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick and Frank Mueller-Langer (2013b), ‘Climbing the shoulders of giants: open access to data’, European Datawatch Extended Project working paper, mimeo.
5. Arrow, Kenneth (1962), ‘Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention’, in Richard Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 609-24.
6. Astle, Peter J. and Adrienne Muir (2002), ‘Digitization and preservation in public libraries and archives’, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 34 (2), 67-79.
7. Bechtold, Stefan (2004), ‘Digital rights management in the United States and Europe’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 52, 323-82.
8. Bechtold, Stefan (2010), ‘Google Book Search - a rich field of scholarship’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 41 (3), 1-2.
9. Bergstrom, Theodore C. (2001), ‘Free labor for costly journals?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (3), 183-98.
10. Bergstrom, Theodore C. (2013), ‘Journal pricing page’, available at: http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Journals/jpricing.html (accessed 21 January 2013).
11. Bergstrom, Theodore C., Jevin D. West and Marc A. Wiseman (2008), ‘The Eigenfactor™ metrics’, Journal of Neuroscience, 28 (45), 11433-4.
12. Bernius, Steffen and Matthias Hanauske (2009), ‘Open access to scientific literature - increasing citations as an incentive for authors to make their publications freely accessible’, Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS-42), Waikoloa, Hawaii.
13. Bernius, Steffen, Matthias Hanauske, Wolfgang König and Berndt Dugall (2009), ‘Open access models and their implications for the players on the scientific publishing market’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 39 (1), 103-15.
14. Björk, Bo-Christer (2012), ‘The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles - a failed experiment?’, Journal of the American Society of Information Sciences and Technology, 63 (8), 1496-1504.
15. Bosch, Xavier (2009), ‘A reflection on open-access, citation counts, and the future of scientific publishing’, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 57, 91-3.
16. Brody, Tim, Stevan Harnad and Les Carr (2006), ‘Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57 (8), 1060-72.
17. Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), available at: http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read (accessed 6 August 2013).
18. Cavaleri, Michael, Giovanni B. Ramello and Vittorio Valli (2009), ‘Publishing an e-journal on a shoe string: is it a sustainable project?’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 39 (1), 89-101.
19. Collins, Alan, Guy Judge and Neil Rickman (2007), ‘On the economics of plagiarism’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 24, 93-107.
20. Davis, Philip M. (2009), ‘Author-choice open access publishing in the biological and medical literature’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (1), 3-8.
21. Davis, Philip M., Bruce V. Lewenstein, Daniel H. Simon, James G. Booth and Mathew J.L. Connolly (2008), ‘Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial’, BMJ, 337, a568.
22. Depoorter, Ben, Adam Holland and Elisabeth Somerstein (2009), ‘Copyright abolition and attribution’, Review of Law and Economics, 5 (3), 1063-80.
23. Dewald, William G., Jerry G. Thursby and Richard G. Anderson (1986), ‘Replication in empirical economics: the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project’, American Economic Review, 76, 587-603.
24. DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) (2013), ‘DOAJ by country’, available at: http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=byCountry&uiLanguage=en (accessed 21 January 2013).
25. Edlin, Aaron S. and Daniel L. Rubinfeld (2004), ‘Exclusion or efficient pricing? The “big deal” bundling of academic journals’, Antitrust Law Journal, 72, 128-59.
26. Eger, Thomas and Marc Scheufen (2012a), ‘The past and the future of copyright law: technological change and beyond’, in Jef De Mot (ed.), Liber Amicorum Boudewijn Bouckaert, Brugge: die Keure, pp. 37-65.
27. Eger, Thomas and Marc Scheufen (2012b), ‘Das Urheberrecht im Zeitenwandel: Von Gutenberg zum Cyberspace’, in Christian Mueller, Frank Trosky and Marion Weber (eds), Ökonomik als allgemeine Theorie menschlichen Verhaltens, Schriften zu Ordnungsfragen der Wirtschaft, vol. 94, Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius, pp. 151-79.
28. Eger, Thomas, Marc Scheufen and Daniel Meierrieks (2013), ‘The determinants of open access publishing: survey evidence from Germany’, SSRN working paper, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2232675.
29. Eysenbach, Gunther (2006), ‘Citation advantage of open access articles’, PLoS Biology, 4 (5), e157, available at doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157 (accessed 21 January 2013).
30. Feess, Eberhard and Marc Scheufen (2011), ‘Academic copyright in the publishing game: a contest perspective’, SSRN working paper, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers%20.cfm7abstract_id5l793867 (accessed 21 January 2013).
31. Gans, Joshua (ed.) (2000), Publishing Economics: Analyses of the Academic Journal Market in Economics, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
32. Garfield, Eugene (1955), ‘The meaning of the impact factor’, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3 (2), 363-9.
33. Gaulé, Patrick and Nicolas Maystreb (2011), ‘Getting cited: does open access help?’, Research Policy, 40, 1332-8.
34. Grimmelmann, J. (2009), ‘How to fix the Google Book Search Settlement’, Journal of Internet Law, 12 (10), 10-20.
35. Hajjem, Chawki, Stevan Harnad and Yves Gingras (2005), ‘Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact’, IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 18 (4), 39-47.
36. Harnad, Stevan (2012), ‘The effect of open access and downloads (“hits”) on citation impact: a bibliography of studies’, available at: http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html (accessed 21 January 2013).
37. Harnad, Stevan, Tim Brody, François Vallières, Les Carr, Steve Hitchcock, Yves Gingras, Charles Oppenheim, Heinrich Stamerjohanns and Eberhard R. Hilf (2004), ‘The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access’, Serials Review, 30 (4), 310-14.
38. Hilty, Reto M. (2006), ‘Five lessons about copyright in the information society: reaction of the scientific community to over-protection and what policy-makers should learn’, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 53 (1), 103-38.
39. Jeon, Doh-Shin and Jean-Charles Rochet (2010), ‘The pricing of academic journals: a two-sided market perspective’, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2, 222-55.
40. Lawrence, Steve and C. Lee Giles (2001), ‘Accessibility of information on the web’, Intelligence, 11 (1), 32-9.
41. Lemley, Mark (2011), ‘Is the sky falling on the content industries?’, Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 9, 125-35.
42. Lichtman, Douglas (2008), ‘Copyright as innovation policy: Google Book Search from a law and economics perspective’, in Josh Lerner and Scott Stern (eds), Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 9, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 55-77.
43. Liebowitz, Stan L. (1985), ‘Copying and indirect appropriability: photocopying of journals’, Journal of Political Economy, 93 (5), 945-57.
44. McCabe, Mark J. and Christopher M. Snyder (2005), ‘Open access and academic journal quality’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 95 (2), 453-8.
45. McCabe, Mark J. and Christopher M. Snyder (2007), ‘Academic journal prices in a digital age: a two-sided market model’, B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 7 (1), Article 2.
46. McCabe, Mark J. and Christopher M. Snyder (2011), ‘Did online access to journals change the economics lit erature?’, SSRN working paper, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm7abstract_id51746243 (accessed 21 January 2013).
47. McCullough, Bruce D. (2009), ‘Open access economics journals and the market for reproducible economic research’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 39 (1), 118-26.
48. McGuigan, Glenn S. (2004), ‘Publishing perils in academe: the serials crisis and the economics of the academic journal publishing industry’, Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship, 10 (1), 13-26.
49. Mann, Florian, Benedikt von Walter, Thomas Hess and Rolf T. Wigand (2008), ‘Open access publishing in science: why it is highly appreciated but rarely used’, Communications of the ACM, 51.
50. Mueller-Langer, Frank and Marc Scheufen (2011), ‘The Google Book Search Settlement: a law and economics analysis’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 8 (1), 7-50.
51. Mueller-Langer, Frank and Richard Watt (2010), ‘Copyright and open access for academic works’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 7 (1), 45-65.
52. Mueller-Langer, Frank and Richard Watt (2012), ‘Optimal pricing and quality of academic journals and the ambiguous welfare effects of forced open access: a two-sided market model’, TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2012-019, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm7abstract_id52045956 (accessed 21 January 2013).
53. Mueller-Langer, Frank and Richard Watt (2013), ‘Analysis of the impact of hybrid open access on journals and authors’, mimeo, University of Canterbury.
54. Norris, Michael, Charles Oppenheim and Fytton Rowland (2008), ‘The citation advantage of open access articles’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (12), 1963-72.
55. OAI (2008), ‘The Open Archives Initiatives Protocol for Metadata Harvesting’, available at: http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html (accessed 25 February 2013).
56. Picker, Randal C. (2009), ‘The Google Book Search Settlement: a new orphan-works monopoly?’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 5 (3), 383-409.
57. Pitsoulis, Athanassios and Jan Schnellenbach (2012), ‘On property rights and incentives in academic publishing’, Research Policy, 41 (8), 1440-47.
58. Ramello, Giovanni B. (2010), ‘Copyright and endogenous market structure: a glimpse from the journalpublishing market’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 7 (1), 7-29.
59. Samuelson, Pamela (2010a), ‘Google Book Search and the future of books in cyberspace’, Minnesota Law Review, 94 (5), 1308-74.
60. Samuelson, Pamela (2010b), ‘Legally speaking: the dead souls of the Google Book Search Settlement’, Communications of the ACM, 53 (7), 32-4.
61. Samuelson, Pamela (2010c), ‘Academic author objections to the Google Book Search Settlement’, Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 8, 491-522.
62. Shavell, Steven (2010), ‘Should copyright of academic works be abolished?’, Journal of Legal Analysis, 2 (1), 301-58.
63. Suber, Peter (2012), Open Access, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports (2011), available at: http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science:products/a-z/journal_citation_reports/ (accessed 21 January 2013).
65. Towse, Ruth, Christian Handke and Paul Stepan (2008), ‘The economics of copyright law: a stocktake of the literature’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 5 (1), 1-22.
66. US District Court Southern District of New York (2011), ‘Authors Guild et al. vs. Google Inc., Opinion 05 Civ. 8136 (DC)’, available at: http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/googlebooksopinion.pdf (accessed 21 January 2013).
67. Zimmermann, Christian (2009), ‘The economics of open access publishing’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 39 (1), 49-52.
68. Lemley, L. (2011). Many useful sources on the history of copyright and its relationship with the diffusion of new technologies are presented in Eger and Scheufen (2012a, 2012b).