Evaluation of TSCH scheduling implementations for real WSN applications

IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA

Volumn 2016-November, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Sempere Paya, V ^a   Silvestre Blanes, J ^a   Todoli, D ^b   Valls, M ^b   Santonja, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE INFORMÁTICA   (Spain)

Author keywords

802.15.4e; OpenWSN; TASA; TSCH; WSN

Indexed keywords

FACTORY AUTOMATION; LOW POWER ELECTRONICS; MEDIUM ACCESS CONTROL;

802.15.4E; CENTRALIZED SCHEDULING; CHANNEL HOPPING; MULTIHOP NETWORKS; OPENWSN; TASA; TSCH; WSN APPLICATIONS;

SCHEDULING;

EID: 84996483380     PISSN: 19460740     EISSN: 19460759     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ETFA.2016.7733642     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. D. D. Guglielmo, G. Anastasi y A. Seghetti, From IEEE 802. 15. 4 to IEEE 802. 15. 4e: A Step towards the Internet of Things, Advances onto the Internet of Things, Springer, 2014.
2. Kristofer S. J. Pister and Lance Doherty, TSMP: Time synchronized mesh protocol, Proc. IAESTED Int. Symp. Distrib. Sens. Netw., Orlando, Florida. 2008.
3. HART, HART Field Communication Protocol Specification. HART Communication Foundation Std. version 7. 4, http://www. hartcomm. org, 2007.
4. ISA, Wireless Systems for Industrial Automation: Process Control and Related Applications, International Society of Automation (ISA) Standard ISA-100. 11a, 2009.
5. G. Patti, G. Alderisi and L. Lo Bello, Introducing multi-level communication in the IEEE 802. 15. 4e protocol: the MultiChannel-LLDN, IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA), 2014.
6. G. Alderisi, G. Patti, O. Mirabella and L. Lo Bello, Simulative Assessments of the IEEE 802. 15. 4e DSME and TSCH in realistic process automation scenarios, Int. Conf. on Industrial Informatics, Cambridge, 2015.
7. T. W. et. al., RPL: IPv6 routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks, IETF. RFC 6550, 2012.
8. T. Watteyne, A. Mehta and K. Pister, Reliability Through Frequency Diversity: Why Channel Hopping Makes Sense, ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks, Tenerife, Spain, 2009.
9. F.-. Richard, Y. Xi Zhang and V. C. Leung, Green Communications and Networking, CRC Press, 2012.
10. M. R. Palattella, N. Accettura, L. A. Grieco, G. Boggi, M. Dohler and T. Engel, On Optimal Scheduling in Duty-Cycled Industrial IoT Applications Using IEEE 802. 15. 4e TSCH, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 13, n 10, pp. 3655-3666, 2013.
11. M. R. Palattella, N. Accettura, M. Dohler, L. A. Grieco and Boggia, Traffic Aware Scheduling Algorithm for Reliable Low-Power Multi-Hop IEEE 802. 15. 4e Networks, IEEE 23rd Int. Symp. on Personal, Indoor and Mibile Radio Communications, 2012.
12. T. Watteyno, X. Vilajosana, B. Kerkez, F. Chraim, K. Weekly, Q. Wang, S. Glaser and K. Pister, OpenWSN: a standards-based low-power wireless development environment, Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 23, n 5, pp. 480-493, 2012.
13. T. W. e. A. Andrew Tinka, A decentralized scheduling algorithm for time synchronized channel hopping, ICST Transactions on Mobile Communications and Applications, 2011.