Short- and Intermediate-Term Trends Affecting Medicaid Policy for Persons with Disability, Chronic Illness, and Special Needs

Journal of Disability Policy Studies

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 236-242

  Wallack, Stanley S ^a   Sciegaj, Mark ^a   Long, Linda ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996262673     PISSN: 10442073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104420730201200403     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law. (1999). Under court order: The Supreme Court ruling in Olmstead v. L.C.- What the community integration mandate means for people with mental illness. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Boston Consulting Group. (1999). Ensuring cost-effective access to innovative pharmaceuticals. Do market interventions work? Warner Lambert Company. Retrieved July 28, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.warner-lambert.com/pricecontrolstudy/study-cover.html
3. Burwell, B. (1999). Medicaid long-term care expenditures in FY 1998. Cambridge, MA: MEDSTAT Group.
4. Cohen, M., Kumar, N., & Wallack, S. (1993). New perspectives on the afford-ability of long term care. The Gerontologist, 33(1), 105-113.
5. Costa, D. (2000). Long-term declines in disability among older men: Medical care, public health and occupational changes (National Bureau of Economic Research [NBER] Working Paper 7605). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
6. Cuellar, A.E., & Wiener, J.M. (2000). Can social insurance for long-term care work? The experience of Germany. Health Affairs, 19(3), 8-25.
7. Davis, D., Fox-Grage, W., & Gehsham, G. (2000). Deinstitutionalization of persons with developmental disabilities: A technical assistance report for legislators. Denver: National Conference of State Legislatures.
8. Feder, J., Komisar, H.L., & Niefeld. (2000). Long-term care in the United States: An overview. Health Affairs, 19(3), 40-56.
9. General Accounting Office. (1999). Adults with severe disabilities: Federal and state approaches for personal care and other services (GAO Publication No. HEHS-99-101). Washington, DC: Author.
10. Harrington, C., Carrillo, H., Wellin, V., & Norwood, F. (2000). 1915(c) Medicaid Home and Community Based Waiver participants, services, and expenditures, 1992-1997: Based on HCFA 372 form data. San Francisco: University of California at San Francisco, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences.
11. Health Care Financing Administration. (2001). Olmstead update No 5: New tools for states.
12. Kelly, J. (2000, July 30). Rights of the disabled are rights like any others: The ADA is 10, old enough to be enforced—Not merely accommodated, or even more offensive to millions, ignored. The Boston Sunday Globe, p. F3.
13. Manton, K.C., Carder, L., & Stallard, E. (1997). Chronic disability trends in elderly United States population: 1982-1994. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 2593-2598.
14. Olmstead v. L. C., 119 S. Ct. 2175 (1999).
15. Rosenbaum, S. (2000). Olmstead v. L. C.: Implications for older persons with mental and physical disabilities. Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons.
16. Simon-Rusinowitz, L., & Hofland, B.F. (1993). Adopting a disability approach to home care services for older adults. Generations, 33(2), 159-167.
17. Smith, G. (2000). Understanding Medicaid home and community services: A primer. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Center for Health Policy Research.
18. Wallack, S., Sciegaj, M., & Long, L. (2000). Monitoring future trends in Medicaid: The challenges ahead in addressing the disparate needs of elders and persons with disability. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University, Heller Graduate School, Schneider Institute for Health Policy.