Consumer Direction, Consumer Choice, and the Future of Long-Term Care

Journal of Disability Policy Studies

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 67-74

  Batavia, Andrew I ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996253017     PISSN: 10442073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/10442073020130020201     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
2. Batavia, A.I. (1998). The prospects for a national personal assistance services program for people with disabilities. American Rehabilitation, 24(3).
3. Batavia, A.I. (2001). A right to personal assistance services: “Most integrated setting appropriate” requirements and the independent living model of long-term care. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 27(1), 17—43.
4. Batavia, A.I. (in press). Independent living: A viable option for long-term care. Clearwater, FL: ABI Professional Publications.
5. Batavia, A.I., DeJong, G., & McKnew, L.B. (1991). Toward a national personal assistance program: The independent living model of long-term care for persons with disabilities. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 16, 523—545.
6. Beatty, P.W., Richmond, G.W., Tepper, S., & DeJong, G. (1998). Personal assistance for people with physical disabilities: Consumer-direction and satisfaction with services. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 674—677.
7. Benjamin, A.E., Matthias, R., & Franke, T.M. (2000). Comparing consumer-directed and agency models for providing supportive services at home. Health Services Research, 35, 351—366.
8. Dautel, P.J., & Frieden, L. (1999). Consumer choice and control: Personal attendant services and supports in America (Report of the National Blue Ribbon Panel on Personal Assistance Services). Houston, TX: Independent Living and Research Utilization Program.
9. DeJong, G. (1979). Independent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60(10), 435— 446.
10. DeJong, G., Batavia, A.I., & McKnew, L. (1992, Winter). The independent living model of personal assistance in national long-term care policy. Generations, 16, 89—95.
11. DeJong G., & Wenker, T. (1979). Attendant care as a prototype independent living service. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60(10), 477—482.
12. DeJong, G., & Wenker, T. (1983). Attendant care as a prototype independent living service. Caring, 2(2), 26—30.
13. Doty, P. (2000). The federal role in the move toward consumer direction. Generations, 24(3), 922—927.
14. Doty, P., Kasper, J., & Litvak, S. (1996). Consumer-directed models of personal care: Lessons from Medicaid. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 74, 377— 409.
15. European Social Network ( John Halloran, editor). (1998). Towards a people's Europe: A report on the development of direct payments in 10 member states of the European union. East Sussex, United Kingdom: Author.
16. Kane, R.A., Kane, R.L., & Ladd, R.C. (1998). The heart of long-term care. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Kapp, M.B. (1999). From medical patients to health care care consumers: Decisional capacity and choices to purchase coverage and services. Aging and Mental Health, 3, 294—300.
18. Kapp, M.B. (1996). Enhancing autonomy and choice in selecting and directing long-term care services. The Elder Law Journal, 4(1), 55—97.
19. Karger, J. (1999). Don't tread on the ADA: Olmstead v L.C. ex rel. Zimmring and the future of community integration for individuals with mental disabilities. Boston College Law Review, 40, 1221.
20. Litvak, S., Zukas, H., & Heumann, J.E. (1987). Attending to America: Personal assistance for independent living. Berkeley, CA: World Institute on Disability.
21. Medicaid Community Attendant Services Act of 1999, S. 1935, 106th Congress (1999).
22. Mahoney, K.J., Simone, K., & Simon-Rusinowitz, L. (2000). Early lessons from the cash and counseling demonstration and evaluation. Generations, 24(3), 41—46.
23. Miller, N. (1992). Medicaid home and community-based care waivers: The first ten years. Health Affairs, 11(4), 162—172.
24. National Association of Protection and Advocacy Systems. (2000). Olmstead progress report: Disability advocates assess state implementation after one year. Retrieved July 25, 2000, from www.protectionandadvocacy.com/progressreportfinal.htm
25. National Conference of State Legislatures. ( 2001). The states’ response to the Olmstead decision: A status report. Retrieved March 2001, from www.ncsl.org/programs/health/forum/olmsreport.htm
26. National Institute on Consumer-Directed Long-Term Services. (1996). Principles of consumer-directed home and community-based services. Washington, DC: The National Council on the Aging.
27. Nosek, M.A. (1993). Personal assistance: Its effect on the long-term health of a rehabilitation hospital population. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(2), 127—132.
28. Richmond, G.W., Beatty, P.W., Tepper, S., & DeJong, G. (1997). The effect of consumer-directed personal assistance services on the productivity outcomes of people with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement, 1(4), 48—51.
29. Simon-Rusinowitz, L., Mahoney, K., Desmond, S.M., et al. (1997). Determining consumer preferences for a cash option (AQ1): Arkansas survey results. Health Care Financing Review, 19(2), 73—96.
30. Stone, R.I. (2000). Introduction—Consumer direction in long-term care: Opportunities, challenges, and limitations of this increasingly popular approach. Generations, 24(3), 5—8.
31. Tilly, J., Weiner, J.M., & Cuellar, A.E. (2000). Consumer-directed home- and community-based services programs in five countries: Policy issues for older people and government. Generations, 24(3), 74—84.