Feminism and Conversation Analysis: An Oxymoron?

Feminism & Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 471-478

  Speer, Susan A ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996215600     PISSN: 09593535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959353599009004013     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Billig, M. (1999) ‘Whose Terms? Whose Ordinariness? Rhetoric and Ideology in Conversation Analysis’, Discourse and Society 10(4): 543-582.
2. Edley, N. and Wetherell, M. (1997) ‘Jockeying for Position: The Construction of Masculine Identities’, Discourse and Society 8(2): 203-217.
3. Edwards, D. (1998) ‘The Relevant Thing about Her: Social Identity Categories in Use’, pp. 15-33 in C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe (eds) Identities in Talk. London: Sage.
4. Frith, H. (1998) ‘Constructing the “Other” through Talk’, Feminism & Psychology 8(4): 530-536.
5. Frith, H. and Kitzinger, C. (1998) ‘“Emotion Work” as a Participant Resource: A Feminist Analysis of Young Women's Talk-in-Interaction’, Sociology 32(2): 299-320.
6. Kitzinger, C. and Frith, H. (1999) ‘Just Say No? The Use of Conversation Analysis in Developing a Feminist Perspective on Sexual Refusal’, Discourse and Society 10(3): 293-316.
7. Nofsinger, R.E. (1991) Everyday Conversation. London: Sage.
8. Psathas, G. (1995) Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. London: Sage.
9. Schegloff, E.A. (1997) ‘Whose Text? Whose Context?’, Discourse and Society 8(2):165-187.
10. Schegloff, E.A. (1998) ‘Reply to Wetherell’, Discourse and Society 9(3): 413-416.
11. Speer, S.A. (under submission) ‘Reconsidering the Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: To What Extent Does it Capture Participants’ Practices?’
12. Stokoe, E.H. (1998) ‘Talking About Gender: The Conversational Construction of Gender Categories in Academic Discourse’, Discourse and Society 9(2): 217-240.
13. Wetherell, M. (1998) ‘Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-structuralism in Dialogue’ Discourse and Society 9(3): 387-412.
14. Wetherell, M. and Edley, N. (1999) ‘Negotiating Hegemonic Masculinity: Imaginary Positions and Psycho-Discursive Practices’, Feminism & Psychology 9(3): 335-356.
15. Widdicombe, S. (1995) ‘Identity, Politics and Talk: A Case for the Mundane and the Everyday’, pp. 106-127 in S. Wilkinson, and C. Kitzinger (eds) Feminism and Discourse: Psychological Perspectives. London: Sage.
16. Zimmerman, D.H. and West, C. (1975) ‘Sex Roles, Interruptions and Silences in Conversation’, in B. Thorne and N. Henley (eds) Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.