Anatomy of Ownership and Management of Public Land in Mumbai: Setting an Agenda Using IAD Framework

Environment and Urbanization Asia

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 203-220

  Pethe, Abhay ^a   Gandhi, Sahil ^a   Tandel, Vaidehi ^a   Libeiro, Sirus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI   (India)

Author keywords

governance; institutional analysis and development framework; Mumbai (India); public land; urban land markets

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996207406     PISSN: 09754253     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/097542531200300111     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aligica P., Tarko V. (2011). Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, and beyond, Governance. In press.
2. Andersson K., Ostrom E. (2008). Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective, Policy Sciences, 41(1): 71–93.
3. Anjaria J.S. (2009). Guardians of the bourgeois city: Citizenship, public space and middle class activism in Mumbai, City and Community, 8(4): 391–406.
4. Annez P.C. (2011). Inclusion and exclusion in cities: A real estate markets and shelter perspective. Presented at the Workshop on Inclusive Cities in India, Delhi, 8th June.
5. Annez P.C., Bertaud A., Patel B., Phatak V.K. (2010). Working with the market: Approach to reducing urban slums in India, Working paper No. 5475. Policy research, The World Bank.
6. Bertaud A. (2004), Mumbai FSI conundrum: The perfect storm: The four factors restricting the construction of new floor space in Mumbai. Presentation available on http://www.alain-bertaud.com.
7. Bertaud A. (2008). Options for new alternatives for development control regulation and justification for increasing FSI. Presentation available on http://www.alain-bertaud.com
8. Bertaud A. (2009). Urban land supply, real resource constraint or man made shortage?
9. Bertaud A. (2010). Land markets, government interventions and housing affordability, Wolfensohn Centre for Development at Brookings Working Paper No. 18.
10. Buckley R.M., Kalarickal J., (Eds). (2006). Thirty years of World Bank shelter lending: What have we learned? Directions in Development–Infrastructure series. (Washington, DC: World Bank).
11. Bushouse B.K. (2011). Governance structures: Using IAD to understand variation in service delivery for club goods with information asymmetry, Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 105–119.
12. Deccan Herald (2011). Criminal conspiracy in Adarsh high rise case: Def Min probe, 29 October 2011, PTI.
13. Deccan Herald (2010). Indian Air Force accuses Mhada of Santa Cruz land grab. 27 March 2010, DNA.
14. DNA. (2011). Adarsh promoter feigns ignorance on land ownership, 13 September 2011, DNA.
15. Feiock R.C., Scholz J.T. (2010). ‘Self-Organizing governance of institutional collective action dilemmas: An overview’, In Feiock R.C., Scholz J.T. (eds), Self-Organising federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action dilemmas (New York: Cambridge University Press).
16. Fernandes L. (2004). The politics of forgetting: Class politics, state power and the restructuring of urban space in India’, Urban Studies, 41(12), 2415–30.
17. Free Press Journal (2011). A curious case of ex-chief ministers. 14 August 2010, Free Press Journal.
18. Gandhi S. (2012). Economics of affordable housing in Indian cities: The case of Mumbai. Environment and Urnanization Asia, 3(1), 221–235.
19. The Hindu (2010). CRZ notice issued to Adarsh in 2009 itself. 31 October 2010, Hindu.
20. Indian Express (2007). Mumbai airport: HDIL gets slum rehab contract. 17 October 2007, Indian Express.
21. Jagger Pamela (2009). Thirty-Five years of scholarship at the workshop in political theory and policy analysis, Indiana University, Bloomington.
22. McGinnis M. (2011). An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom workshop: A simple guide to a complex framework, Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 169–183.
23. McGinnis M., (ed.) (1999). Polycentric governance and development: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
24. McKinsey Global Institute: (2010). India's urban awakening: Building inclusive cities, Sustaining Economic Growth.
25. Mooya M. (2011). Making urban real estate markets work for the poor: Theory, policy and practice’, Cities, 28(3), 238–244.
26. Mumbai Human Development Report. (2009). Oxford University Press, New Delhi. http://mhupa.gov.in/W_new/Mumbai%20HDR%20Complete.pdf
27. Nainan N. (2008). Building boomers and fragmentation of space in Mumbai, Economic and Political Weekly, 43(21), 29–34.
28. Nallathiga R. (2006). An Evaluation of the Impact of Density Regulation on Land Markets in Mumbai, International Real Estate Review, 9, 132–152.
29. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
30. NDTV (2010a). Air Force moves court over land grab in Mumbai. 31 March 2010, NDTV.
31. NDTV (2010b). Adarsh Society scam: Where are the Kargil martyrs in the allottees? 30 October 2010, NDTV.
32. NDTV (2010c), Adarsh Scam: Vilasrao Deshmukh sanctioned expansion. 4 November 2010, NDTV.
33. Oakerson Ronald J., Parks Roger B. (1988). Citizen voice and public entrepreneurship: The organizational dynamic of a complex metropolitan county, Publius, 18(4), 91–112.
34. Ostrom E., Parks R. (1999). Neither Gargantua nor the Land of Lilliputs: Conjectures of mixed systems of metropolitan organization, in McGinnis (editor), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies. Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 284–305.
35. Ostrom E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework, Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27.
36. Ostrom E. (2010). Organisational economics: Applications to metropolitan governance. Journal of Institutional Economics, 6(1), 109–15.
37. Ostrom E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. (Princeton University Press, Princeton).
38. Ostrom E. (1989). Local government constitutions: A different view of metropolitan governance, American Review of Public Administration, 19(4), 279–294.
39. Ostrom E., Parks R.B., Whitaker G.P. (1978). Patterns of metropolitan policing (Ballinger Publishing Co. United States).
40. Ostrom E., Basurto X. (2011). Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3), 317–343.
41. Ostrom V. (1999). Polycentricity (Part I), in McGinnis M. (editor), Polycentricity and local public economies. Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 52–74.
42. Ostrom V., Tiebout C., Warren R. (1961). The organisation of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry, American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–42.
43. Patel S., Arputham J. (2007). An offer of partnership or a promise of conflict in Dharavi, Mumbai?’, Environment & Urbanization, 19(2), 501–508.
44. Patel S., Arputham J. (2008). ‘Plans for Dharavi: Negotiating a reconciliation between a state-driven market redevelopment and residents aspirations’, Environment and Urbanization, 20(1), 243–254.
45. Patel S., Sharma K. (1998). One David and three Goliaths: Avoiding anti-poor solutions to Mumbai's transport problems, Environment and Urbanization, 10(2), 149–159.
46. Patel S., Arputham J., Burra S., Savchuk K. (2009). Getting the information base for Dharavi's redevelopment, Environment and Urbanization, 21(1), 241–252.
47. Peterson G. E. (2009). Unlocking land values to finance urban infrastructure. (Washington, DC: World Bank).
48. Pethe A. (2010a). Collusion, conflicts, informal systems & rent seeking: The great prototype Indian story of urban land management in Mumbai. Synthesis report of a study undertaken for World Bank presented at Urban Design and Research Institute, Mumbai, 10 December.
49. Pethe A. (2010b). Contextualizing land management issues within the framework of urban governance: Case of Mumbai, Presentation at the International Workshop on Expanding Land Access, World Bank, Washington, DC. (http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTHOUSINGLAND/Resources/339552-1272658002920/Pethe.pdf)
50. Pethe A. (2012). Metropolitan public finance: The case of Mumbai. Forthcoming in Bahl Roy, Linn Johannes, Wetzel Deborah, Ingram Gregory (es), Metropolitan government finances in developing countries.
51. Pethe A., Gandhi S., Tandel V. (2011). Assessing the Mumbai metropolitan region: A governance perspective, Economic and Political Weekly, 46(26&27), 187–195.
52. Polanyi M. (1951). The logic of liberty. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
53. Rajack R. (2009). Does public ownership and management of land matter for land market outcomes? in Lall S., Freire M., Yuen B., Rajack R., Helluin J.-J. (eds), Urban land markets: Improving land management for successful urbanization, (USA: Springer).
54. Sanyal B., Mukhija V. (2001). Institutional pluralism and housing delivery: A case of unforeseen conflicts in Mumbai, India, World Development, 29(12), 2043–57.
55. Satterthwaite D. (2009). Getting land for housing: What strategies work for low-income groups? Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 299–307.
56. Times of India (2009). Our officials run slum racket: BMC. 23 February 2009, Times of India.
57. Times of India (2010), Now, Mhada will buy land for hsg projects. 8 August 2010, Times of India.
58. Times of India (2011a). Garib Nagar land belongs to railways: Govt. 1 April 2011, Times of India.
59. Times of India (2011b). Slums thrive 100 m from runway. 7 July 2011, Times of India.
60. Times of India (2011c). Congress wants army to prove ownership of Adarsh land. 11 October 2011, Times of India.
61. Weinstein L. (2008). Mumbai's development mafias: Globalization, organized crime and land development, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 22–39.
62. Weinstein L., Ren X. (2009). The changing right to the city: Urban renewal and housing rights in globalizing Shanghai and Mumbai, City and Community, 8(4), 407– 432.
63. Whitehead J., More N. (2007). Revanchism in Mumbai? Political economy of rent gaps and urban restructuring in a global city, Economic and Political Weekly, 42(25), 2428–2434.
64. Zérah M.-H. (2007). Conflict between green space preservation and housing needs: The case of the Sanjay Gandhi National Park in Mumbai, Cities, 24(2), 122–132.
65. Zérah M.-H. (2009). Participatory governance in urban management and the shifting geometry of power in Mumbai, Development and Change, 40(5), 853–877.