The ‘Modernisation’ of Political Management Arrangements in Post Devolution Scottish Local Government

Public Policy and Administration

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 63-83

  Mcateer, Mark ^a   Orr, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996203756     PISSN: 09520767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/095207670301800106     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barnes, M. (1997), Care, Communities and Citizens (London: Longman).
2. Bennett M., Fairley J. and McAteer M. (2002), Devolution in Scotland: The Impact on Local Government (York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
3. Blair T. (1998), Leading the Way: A new vision for local government (London: Institute for Public Policy Research).
4. Burns D. (2000), ‘Can Local Democracy Survive Governance’, Urban Studies, Vol 37, No 5-6, pp. 963-973
5. Copus, C. (1999), ‘The party group: a barrier to democratic renewal’, Local Government Studies, Vol 25, No 4.
6. Copus, C. (2001), ‘Citizen Participation in Local Government: The Influence of the Political party Group’, Local Governance, Autumn.
7. COSLA (2002), Focusing On Citizens: A Guide To Approaches and Methods (on Line Edition, available at www.cosla.gov.uk
8. DLTR, (1998), Guidance on Enhancing Public Participation in Local Government (London: Stationery Office).
9. Filkin G., Lord Bassam, Paul Corrigan, Gerry Stoker and John Tizard (1999), Modernising Local Government (York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
10. Hambleton, R. (1998), Local Government Political Management Arrangements - An International Perspective. Paper Prepared for the Commission on Local Government and the Scottish Parliament (Edinburgh: The Scottish Office Central Research Unit).
11. House of Commons Select Committee on Local Government and The Regions (2002), Enquiry into The Implementation of The Local Government Act (London: House of Commons).
12. Kerley, R. (Chm)(2000), Report of the Renewing Local Democracy Working Group (Tactica Solutions).
13. King D. and Stoker G. (1996), Rethinking Local Democracy (London: Macmillan).
14. Loughlin, M. (1996), Legality and Locality: The Role of Law in Central-Local Government Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
15. Lowndes V., Pratchett L. and Stoker G. (2001), ‘Trends in Public Participation: part 1 and Part 2- Local Government Perspectives’, Public Administration, Vol 79, No 1-2, pp. 205-222 and 445-455.
16. Marr, A. (1999), ‘Pioneers, hucksters and snake-oil salesmen? Thank god for some decent politics at last’, Guardian Unlimited, Sunday 21 March.
17. McAteer M., Orr K. and Bennett M. (2003), The Impact of Increased Public Participation on Scottish Local Authorities, Local Government Committee 3rd Report, Report on Inquiry into Renewing Local Democracy (Edinburgh: The Scottish Parliament).
18. McIntosh, N. (Chm)(1999), Report of the Commission on Local Government and the Scottish Parliament (Edinburgh: Stationery Office).
19. McNish, A. (Chm)(2001), Report of the Leadership Advisory Panel (Edinburgh: Stationery Office).
20. Midwinter, A. (2002), Written evidence to the Local Government Committee, 6th Report 2002, Report of Inquiry into Local Government Finance, Scottish Parliament, volume 1, SP Paper 551,Stationery Office.
21. New Local Government Network (2002), ‘Your Mayor - The Campaign’, Your Mayor Your Choice, at www.nlgn.org.uk.
22. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (1998), Modern Local Government, In Touch with the People, White Paper, 30 July.
23. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (1999 a), Strong Local Leadership - Quality Public Services, Cmnd. 5237, 25 March.
24. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (1999 b), Local Leadership - Local Choice, 25 March.
25. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2001), Petitioning for an Elected Mayor - Information Pack, 26 March.
26. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2002 a), Connecting With Communities: Improving Communications in Local Government.
27. Office of The Deputy Prime Minister (2002 b), Public Participation in Local Government: A Survey of Local Authorities.
28. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2002 c), Tackling Poor Performance in Local Government.
29. Pratchett, L. (2002), ‘Local Government: From Modernisation to Consolidation’, Parliamentary Affairs, Vol 55.
30. Rose, A. and Lawton, A. (eds) (1999), Public Services Management (Harlow and London: Prentice Hall).
31. Scottish Executive (2002 a), Local Government in Scotland Bill, Policy Memorandum (Edinburgh: Stationery Office).
32. Scottish Executive (2002 b), Renewing Local Democracy: Next Steps (Edinburgh: Stationery Office).
33. Stoker G., John P., Gains, F. Nirmala R. and Harding A. (2002), Report of Evaluating Local Governance, Survey Findings for Office of Deputy Prime Minister Advisory Group, Evaluating Local Governance: New Constitutions and Ethics (Manchester: Department of Government, Manchester University).
34. Stoker, G. (1994), The Role and Purpose of Local Government, Commission for Local Democracy Research Report No 4.
35. Stoker, G. (1999), The Politics of Local Government (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
36. Stoker, G. (2002), Evidence to the Scottish Parliament Local Government Committee, 8 January, Scottish Parliament, Vol 1, SP Paper 551,Stationery Office.
37. Stoker, G. and Wolman, H. (1992), ‘Drawing lessons from US experience: an elected mayor for British local government’, Public Administration, Vol 72, No 2.
38. Tomaney, J. (2001), ‘The new governance of London. A case of post-democracy?’, City, Vol 5, No 2.
39. Travers, T. (2001), ‘Local Government’, in Seldon, A. (ed.), The Blair Effect. The first Blair Government, 1997-2001 (London: Little, Brown and Company).