Sweden in the European Union: Changing expectations?

Journal of European Integration

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 303-333

  Miles, Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Council Presidency; European Union; Full membership; Sweden; Time periods; Typology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996174202     PISSN: 07036337     EISSN: 14772280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07036330108429107     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andersson, H.E., 2000. “ Sweden: a Mainstream Member State and a Part of Norden ”. In Sweden and the European Union Evaluated, Edited by: Miles, L., 215–30. London: Continuum.
2. Archer, C., 2000. Euroscepticism in the Nordic Region. Journal of European Integration, 22 (1): 87–114.
3. Burgess, M., 2000. Federalism and European Union: The Building of Europe, 1950–2000, Routledge: London.
4. Calmfors, L., Flam, H., Gottfries, N., Lindahl, R., Matlary, J.H., Jerneck, M., Berntsson, C., Rabinowicz, E., and Vredin, A., 1997. EMU ‐ A Swedish Perspective, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
5. Ekengren, M., 1996. The Europeanization of State Administration: Adding the Time Dimension. Cooperation and Conflict, 31 (4): 387–416.
6. Ekengren, M., and Sundelius, B., 1998. “ Sweden: the State Joins the European Union ”. In Adjusting to European Integration: Small States and the European Union, Edited by: Hanf, B., and Soetendorp, B., 131–148. London: Longman.
7. George, S., 2000. Britain: Anatomy of a Eurosceptic State. Journal of European Integration, 22 (1): 15–33.
8. Gould, A., 2000. “ Swedish Social Policy and the EU Social Dimension ”. In Sweden and the European Union Evaluated, Edited by: Miles, L., 201–14. London: Continuum.
9. Hallenberg, J., 2000. “ Swedish Foreign and Security Policy ”. In Sweden and the European Union Evaluated, Edited by: Miles, L., 19–32. London: Continuum.
10. Kassim, H., Peters, G.B., and Wright, V., eds. The National Co‐ordination of EU Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Kinnwall, M., 2000. “ Swedish Monetary Policy: on the Road to EMU? ”. In Sweden and the European Union Evaluated, Edited by: Miles, L., 146–65. London: Continuum.
12. Lindahl, R., 1996. “ The Swedish Debate ”. In The IGC ‐ The National Debates 2, Edited by: Janning, J., Algieri, F., Rodrigo, F., Lindahl, R., Grabbe, H., and Hughes, K., 37–50. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
13. Miljan, T., 1977. The Reluctant Europeans, London: Hurst and Co.
14. Miles, L., 1997. Sweden and European Integration, Ashgate: Aldershot.
15. Miles, L., 1998. Sweden and the IGC: Testing the ‘Membership Diamond’. Cooperation and Conflict, 33 (4): 339–66.
16. Miles, L., ed. 2000a. Sweden and the European Union Evaluated, London: Continuum.
17. Miles, L., Geyer, R., Ingebritsen, C., and Moses, J., eds. 2000b. “ Making Peace with the European Union: the Swedish Social Democratic Party and European Integration ”. In Globalization, Europeanization and Scandinavian Social Democracy, 218–239. London: Longman.
18. Miles, L., 2000c. “ Sweden and Finland ”. In The Foreign Policies of European Union Member States, Edited by: Manners, I., and Whitman, R.G., 181–203. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
19. Milner, S., 2000. Introduction: A Healthy Scepticism?. Journal of European Integration, 22 (1): 1–13.
20. Molin, K., 1999. The Role of Sweden in EU Environmental Policy. European Environmental Law Review, 8 (8/9): 243–51.
21. Molin, K., and Wurzel, R.K.W., 2000. “ Swedish Environmental Policy ”. In Sweden and the European Union Evaluated, Edited by: Miles, L., 166–79. London: Continuum.
22. Mörth, U., 2000. “ Swedish Industrial Policy and Research and Technological Development: the Case of European Defence Cooperation ”. In Sweden and the European Union Evaluated, Edited by: Miles, L., 127–45. London: Continuum.
23. Ojanen, H., Herolf, G., and Lindahl, R., 2000. Non‐Alignment and European Security Policy: Ambiguity at Work, Helsinki and Bonn, Finnish Institute of International Affairs/ Institut fur Europäische Politik.
24. Putnam, R., 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two‐Level Games. International Organization, 42 (3): 427–60.