The future of nuclear power after fukushima

Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 99-113

  Joskow, Paul L ^a   Parsons, John E ^a  

^a ALFRED P SLOAN FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Electricity generation; Fukushima accident; Nuclear power

Indexed keywords

EID: 84995958533     PISSN: 21605882     EISSN: 21605890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.1.2.7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. ASN, 2011, Complementary Safety Assessments of the French Nuclear Power Plants (European "Stress Tests"), French Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN), December.
2. DG Energy, 2011, After Fukushima: EU Stress tests start on 1 June, EU Commissioner for Energy, Press Release IP/11/640, Brussels, 25 May.
3. Du, Yangbo, and John E. Parsons, 2009, Update on the Cost of Nuclear Power, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research Working Paper #09-004.
4. Du, Yangbo, and John E. Parsons, 2010, Capacity Factor Risk at Nuclear Power Plants, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research Working Paper #2010-016, November.
5. EIA, 2010a, Annual Energy Outlook 2010, With Projections to 2035, U. S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, DOE/EIA-0383 (2010), April.
6. EIA, 2010b, Updated Capital Cost Estimates for Electricity Generation Plants, U. S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, November.
7. EIA, 2011a, Annual Energy Outlook 2011, With Projections to 2035, U. S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, DOE/EIA-0383 (2011), April.
8. EIA, 2011b, International Energy Outlook 2011, U. S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, DOE/EIA-0484 (2011), September.
9. Institute for Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), 2011, Special Report on the Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Daiici Nuclear Power Station, INPO 11-005, November 2011.
10. Joskow, Paul L., 2011a, Comparing the Costs of Intermittent and Dispatchable Electricity Generating Technologies, American Economic review: Papers and Proceedings 100 (3), 238-241. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1257/aer. 101. 3. 238.
11. Joskow, Paul L., 2011b, Comparing the Costs of Intermittent and Dispatchable Electricity Generating Technologies. MIT CEEPR Working Paper WP-2010-013 as revised February 9, 2011. http://econ-www. mit. edu/files/6317.
12. NRC, 2011a, NRC Issues Mid-Cycle Assessments for Nation's Nuclear Plants, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Press Release No. 11-16, September 6.
13. NRC, 2011b, Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century, The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, July 12.
14. Nuttall, W. J., 2005, Nuclear Renaissance-Technologies and Policies for the Future of Nuclear Power, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia.
15. ONR, 2011, Japanese earthquake and tsunami: Implications for the UK nuclear industry, Final Report, UK Office for Nuclear Regulation, HM Chief Inspector of Nuclear Installations, ONR Report ONR-FR-REP-11-002 Revision 2, September.