Practical considerations in improving research through public involvement

Research Involvement and Engagement

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Jenner, Martin K ^a,b   Gilchrist, Mark ^a   Baker, Gillian C ^b  

^a ROYAL DEVON AND EXETER NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Experimental medicine; Lay steering committees; Public involvement; Tissue banks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84995920527     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20567529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40900-015-0002-y     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. INVOLVE. NIHR Senior Investigators: leaders for patient and public involvement in research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE; 2014.
2. Denegri,S. 2014 http://simondenegri.com/2014/07/23/what-have-people-told-us-about-public-involvement-in-research/
3. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Tysall C, Hughes J, et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. The patient—Patient Centred Outcomes Research. 2014.
4. NIHR. Going the extra mile. 2015. http://www.nihr.ac.uk/get-involved/Extra%20Mile2.pdf.
5. Steinsbekk KS, Myskja BJ, Solberg B. Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem? European Journal of Human Genetics. 2013;21:897–902.