Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

Annals of Oncology

Volumn 27, Issue , 2016, Pages v58-v68

  Escudier, B ^a   Porta, C ^b   Schmidinger, M ^c   Rioux Leclercq, N ^d   Bex, A ^e   Khoo, V ^f,g   Gruenvald, V ^h   Horwich, A ⁱ   on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Committee, ^j  

^a INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

^b FONDAZIONE IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN MATTEO   (Italy)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^e NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^f ROYAL MARSDEN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^h HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

ⁱ INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^j ESMO HEAD OFFICE   (Switzerland)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER STAGING; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KIDNEY TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RENAL CELL CARCINOMA;

CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; NEOPLASM STAGING;

EID: 84995802295     PISSN: 09237534     EISSN: 15698041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw328     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66: 7-30.
2. Chow WH, Dong LM, Devesa SS. Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2010; 7: 245-257.
3. Volpe A, Kachura JR, Geddie WR et al. Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol 2007; 178: 379-386.
4. Marconi L, Dabestani S, Lam TB et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous renal tumour biopsy. Eur Urol 2016; 69: 660-673.
5. Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA et al. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part A: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol 2016; 70: 93-105.
6. Delahunt B, Cheville JC, Martignoni G et al. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for renal cell carcinoma and other prognostic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol 2013; 37: 1490-1504.
7. Brugarolas J. Molecular genetics of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 1968-1976.
8. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 883-892.
9. Gerlinger M, Horswell S, Larkin J et al. Genomic architecture and evolution of clear cell renal cell carcinomas defined by multiregion sequencing. Nat Genet 2014; 46: 225-233.
10. Hakimi AA, Ostrovnaya I, Reva B et al. Adverse outcomes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma with mutations of 3p21 epigenetic regulators BAP1 and SETD2: a report by MSKCC and the KIRC TCGA research network. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19: 3259-3267.
11. Hakimi AA, Pham CG, Hsieh JJ. A clear picture of renal cell carcinoma. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 849-850.
12. Voss MH, Hakimi AA, Pham CG et al. Tumor genetic analyses of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and extended benefit from mTOR inhibitor therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20: 1955-1964.
13. Linehan WM, Spellman PT et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of papillary renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 135-145.
14. Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC et al. Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. Cancer 2003; 97: 1663-1671.
15. Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Dorey F et al. Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 1649-1657.
16. Sun M, Shariat SF, Cheng C et al. Prognostic factors and predictive models In renal cell carcinoma: a contemporary review. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 644-661.
17. Motzer RJ, Mazumdar M, Bacik J et al. Survival and prognostic stratification of 670 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2530-2540.
18. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Bukowski R et al. Prognostic factors for survival in 1059 patients treated with sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2013; 108: 2470-2477.
19. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM et al. Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5794-5799.
20. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM et al. External validation and comparison with other models of the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 141-148.
21. Ko JJ, Xie W, Kroeger N et al. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium model as a prognostic tool in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma previously treated with first-line targeted therapy: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 293-300.
22. Jones J, Otu H, Spentzos D et al. Gene signatures of progression and metastasis in renal cell cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 5730-5739.
23. Rini B, Goddard A, Knezevic D et al. A 16-gene assay to predict recurrence after surgery in localised renal cell carcinoma: development and validation studies. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 676-685.
24. MacLennan S, Imamura M, Lapitan MC et al. Systematic review of oncological outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 972-993.
25. Dabestani S, Marconi L, Hofmann F et al. Local treatments for metastases of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: e549-e561.
26. Jewett MA, Mattar K, Basiuk J et al. Active surveillance of small renal masses: progression patterns of early stage kidney cancer. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 39-44.
27. Bekema HJ, MacLennan S, Imamura M et al. Systematic review of adrenalectomy and lymph node dissection in locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 799-810.
28. Haas NB, Manola J, Uzzo RG et al. Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 2008-2016.
29. Flanigan RC, Mickisch G, Sylvester R et al. Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cancer: a combined analysis. J Urol 2004; 171: 1071-1076.
30. Escudier B, Pluzanska A, Koralewski P et al. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet 2007; 370: 2103-2111.
31. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al. Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 115-124.
32. Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Mardiak J et al. Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1061-1068.
33. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D et al. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 722-731.
34. Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P et al. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2271-2281.
35. Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM et al. Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 125-134.
36. Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P et al. Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011; 378: 1931-1939.
37. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S et al. Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet 2008; 372: 449-456.
38. Choueiri TK, Escudier B, Powles T et al. Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1814-1823.
39. Choueiri TK, Escudier B, Powles T et al. Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (METEOR): final results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 917-927.
40. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1803-1813.
41. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Glen H et al. Lenvatinib, everolimus, and the combination in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 1473-1482.
42. Motzer RJ, Porta C, Vogelzang NJ et al. Dovitinib versus sorafenib for third-line targeted treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 286-296.
43. Motzer RJ, Barrios CH, Kim TM et al. Phase II randomized trial comparing sequential first-line everolimus and second-line sunitinib versus first-line sunitinib and second-line everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 2765-2772.
44. Armstrong AJ, Halabi S, Eisen T et al. Everolimus versus sunitinib for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ASPEN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 378-388.
45. Tannir NM, Jonasch E, Albiges L et al. Everolimus versus sunitinib prospective evaluation in metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ESPN): a randomized multicenter phase 2 trial. Eur Urol 2016; 69: 866-874.
46. Khoo VS, Pyle L. Radiotherapy and supportive care. In Eisen T, Christmas T (eds), Clinical Progress in Renal Cancer, Vol 15. Oxford: Informa UK Ltd 2007; 191-201. ISBN 10-1-84184-604-X.
47. De Meerleer G, Khoo V, Escudier B et al. Radiotherapy for renal-cell carcinoma. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: e170-e177.
48. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF et al. Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet2005; 366: 643-648.
49. Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW et al. Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1665-1672.
50. Kocher M, Soffietti R, Abacioglu U et al. Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation after radiosurgery or surgical resection of one to three cerebral metastases: results of the EORTC 22952-26001 study. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 134-141.
51. Henry DH, Costa L, Goldwasser F et al. Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 1125-1132.
52. Rosen LS, Gordon D, Tchekmedyian NS et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and other solid tumors: a randomized, Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Cancer 2004; 100: 2613-2621.
53. Cherny NI, Sullivan R, Dafni U et al. A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 1547-1573.
54. Dykewicz CA. Summary of the guidelines for preventing opportunistic infections among hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 139-144.