Outcome Implication of Aortic Valve Area Normalized to Body Size in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis

Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2016, Pages

  Tribouilloy, Christophe ^a,b   Bohbot, Yohann ^a   Maréchaux, Sylvestre ^b,c   Debry, Nicolas ^d   Delpierre, Quentin ^a   Peltier, Marcel ^a   Diouf, Momar ^a   Slama, Michel ^a,b   Messika Zeitoun, David ^e   Rusinaru, Dan ^a,b  

^a AMIENS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE PICARDIE JULES VERNE   (France)

^c UNIV LILLE   (France)

^d LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^e BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Aortic valve; aortic valve stenosis; asymptomatic conditions; echocardiography; prognosis

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; ASYMPTOMATIC DISEASE; BODY MASS; BODY SIZE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY RISK; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BODY HEIGHT; BODY SURFACE; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EVALUATION STUDY; FRANCE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ASYMPTOMATIC DISEASES; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY SURFACE AREA; BODY WEIGHT; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE VOLUME; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 84995790751     PISSN: 19419651     EISSN: 19420080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005121     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes MJ, Barón-Esquivias G, Baumgartner H, Borger MA, Carrel TP, De Bonis M, Evangelista A, Falk V, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Pierard L, Price S, Schäfers HJ, Schuler G, Stepinska J, Swedberg K, Takkenberg J, Von Oppell UO, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Zembala M. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451-2496.
2. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP III, Guyton RA, O'Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM III, Thomas JD; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:2440-2492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000029.
3. Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kienzle RP, Neumann FJ, Jander N. Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1043-1048. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm543.
4. Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kienzle RP, Neumann FJ, Jander N. Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function. Heart. 2010;96:1463-1468. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.181982.
5. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, Iung B, Otto CM, Pellikka PA, Quinoñes M; EAE/ASE. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:1-25. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen303.
6. Tobin JR Jr, Rahimtoola SH, Blundell PE, Swan HJ. Percentage of left ventricular stroke work loss. A simple hemodynamic concept for estimation of severity in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1967;35:868-879.
7. Frank S, Johnson A, Ross J Jr.Natural history of valvular aortic stenosis. Br Heart J. 1973;35:41-46.
8. Rahimtoola SH. Determining that aortic valve stenosis is severe: back-tothe-future: physical examination and aortic valve area index/energy loss index
9. Jander N, Gohlke-Bärwolf C, Bahlmann E, Gerdts E, Boman K, Chambers JB, Egstrup K, Nienaber CA, Pedersen TR, Ray S, Rossebø AB, Willenheimer R, Kienzle RP, Wachtell K, Neumann FJ, Minners J. Indexing aortic valve area by body surface area increases the prevalence of severe aortic stenosis. Heart. 2014;100:28-33. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304443.
10. Michelena HI, Margaryan E, Miller FA, Eleid M, Maalouf J, Suri R, Messika-Zeitoun D, Pellikka PA, Enriquez-Sarano M. Inconsistent echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis: is the left ventricular outflow tract important Heart. 2013;99:921-931. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302881.
11. Michelena HI, Pibarot P, Enriquez-Sarano M. Echocardiographic severity grading in aortic stenosis: no holy grail, only lessons towards patient individualisation. Heart. 2014;100:4-5. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304747.
12. Tribouilloy C, Rusinaru D, Maréchaux S, Castel AL, Debry N, Maizel J, Mentaverri R, Kamel S, Slama M, Lévy F. Low-gradient, low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: characteristics, outcome, and implications for surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:55-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.080.
13. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, Lang I, Christ G, Schemper M, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:611-617. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008313430903.
14. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, Butchart E, Dion R, Filippatos G, Flachskampf F, Hall R, Iung B, Kasprzak J, Nataf P, Tornos P, Torracca L, Wenink A; Task Force on the Management of Valvular Hearth Disease of the European Society of Cardiology; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:230-268. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl428.
15. Iung B, Gohlke-Bärwolf C, Tornos P, Tribouilloy C, Hall R, Butchart E, Vahanian A; Working Group on Valvular Heart Disease. Recommendations on the management of the asymptomatic patient with valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:1253-1266.
16. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, D'Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 2008;27:157-72; discussion 207. doi: 10.1002/sim.2929.
17. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, Steyerberg EW. Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med. 2011;30:11-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.4085.
18. Uno H, Tian L, Cai T, Kohane IS, Wei LJ. A unified inference procedure for a class of measures to assess improvement in risk prediction systems with survival data. Stat Med. 2013;32:2430-2442. doi: 10.1002/sim.5647.
19. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS. III ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1999: 391-394.
20. Dewey FE, Rosenthal D, Murphy DJ Jr, Froelicher VF, Ashley EA. Does size matter Clinical applications of scaling cardiac size and function for body size. Circulation. 2008;117:2279-2287. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.736785.
21. Gutgesell HP, Rembold CM. Growth of the human heart relative to body surface area. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:662-668.
22. Minners J, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kaufmann BA, Bahlmann E, Gerdts E, Boman K, Chambers JB, Nienaber CA, Willenheimer R, Wachtell K, Holme I, Pedersen TR, Neumann FJ, Jander N. Adjusting parameters of aortic valve stenosis severity by body size. Heart. 2014;100:1024-1030. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305225.
23. Braunwald E, Goldblatt A, Aygen MM, Rockoff SD, Morrow AG. Congenital aortic stenosis. I. Clinical and hemodynamic findings in 100 patients. II. Surgical treatment and the results of operation. Circulation. 1963;27:426-462.
24. Saito T, Muro T, Takeda H, Hyodo E, Ehara S, Nakamura Y, Hanatani A, Shimada K, Yoshiyama M. Prognostic value of aortic valve area index in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.02.056.
25. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, Munt BI, Fujioka M, Healy NL, Kraft CD, Miyake-Hull CY, Schwaegler RG. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation. 1997;95:2262-2270.
26. Rosenhek R, Zilberszac R, Schemper M, Czerny M, Mundigler G, Graf S, Bergler-Klein J, Grimm M, Gabriel H, Maurer G. Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2010;121:151-156. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894170.
27. Malouf J, Le Tourneau T, Pellikka P, Sundt TM, Scott C, Schaff HV, Enriquez-Sarano M. Aortic valve stenosis in community medical practice: determinants of outcome and implications for aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:1421-1427. doi: 10.1016/j. jtcvs.2011.09.075.
28. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB, Pencina KM, Janssens AC, Greenland P. Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176:473-481. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws207.