The therapist's role in the implementation of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for patients with depression: Study protocol

BMC Psychiatry

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Mol, Mayke ^a,b   Dozeman, Els ^a,b   van Schaik, Digna J F ^a,b   Vis, Christiaan P C D ^b,c   Riper, Heleen ^a,b,c   Smit, Jan H ^a,b  

^a Department of Research and Innovation ^*  (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Blended treatment; Depression; E mental health; Implementation; Internet based cognitive behavioural therapy; Online treatment; Routine practice; Therapist's role

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLIENT SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE 8; COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; DEPRESSION; EFFECT SIZE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; INTERNET BASED COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; INVENTORY OF DEPRESSIVE DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMATOLOGY; INVENTORY OF DEPRESSIVE SYMPTMS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PSYCHOEDUCATION; PSYCHOTHERAPIST; RATING SCALE; RELAPSE; ROUTINE OUTCOME MEASUREMENT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITIVE THERAPY; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHIATRIC NURSING; PSYCHIATRY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TELEMEDICINE; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; PSYCHIATRIC NURSING; PSYCHIATRY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TELEMEDICINE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84995748165     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1471244X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-1045-9     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, Riper H, Hedman E. Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014;13:288-95.
2. Hedman E, Ljótsson B, Lindefors N. Cognitive behavior therapy via the Internet: a systematic review of applications, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12:745-64.
3. Krijgsman J, Peeters J, Burghouts A, Brabers A, de Jong J, Moll T, et al. Tussen vonk en vlam: eHealth-monitor 2015. 2015. Nictiz en het NIVEL.
4. Management of mental health disorders through advanced technology and services-telehealth for the MIND. (2014). http://mastermind-project.eu/. Accessed 22 Aug 2016.
5. Vis C, Kleiboer A, Prior R, Bønes E, Cavallo M, Clark SA, et al. Implementing and up-scaling evidence-based eMental health in Europe: the study protocol for the MasterMind project. Internet Interv. 2015;2:399-409.
6. Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:38-46.
7. Cochrane LJ, Olson CA, Murray S, Dupuis M, Tooman T, Hayes S. Gaps between knowing and doing: understanding and assessing the barriers to optimal health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007;27:94-102.
8. Glasgow RE. eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:119-26.
9. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322-7.
10. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.
11. RE-AIM framework. (2016). http://www.re-aim.org/. Accessed 22 Aug 2016.
12. Kenter RMF, van de Ven PM, Cuijpers P, Koole G, Niamat S, Gerrits RS, et al. Costs and effects of Internet cognitive behavioral treatment blended with face-to-face treatment: results from a naturalistic study. Internet Interv. 2015;2:77-83.
13. Carper MM, McHugh RK, Barlow DH. The dissemination of computer-based psychological treatment: a preliminary analysis of patient and clinician perceptions. Adm Policy Ment Heal. 2013;40:87-95.
14. Donovan CL, Poole C, Boyes N, Redgate J, March S. Australian mental health worker attitudes towards cCBT: What is the role of knowledge? Are there differences? Can we change them? Internet Interv. 2015;2:372-81.
15. Wilhelmsen M, Hoifodt RS, Kolstrup N, Waterloo K, Eisemann M, Chenhall R, et al. Norwegian general practitioners' perspectives on implementation of a guided web-based cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:9.
16. Kivi M, Eriksson MCM, Hange D, Petersson E-L, Björkelund C, Johansson B. Experiences and attitudes of primary care therapists in the implementation and use of internet-based treatment in Swedish primary care settings. Internet Interv. 2015;2:248-56.
17. Bengtsson J, Nordin S, Carlbring P. Therapists' experiences of conducting cognitive behavioural therapy online vis-à-vis face-to-face. Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;6073:1-10.
18. Landsverk J, Brown H, Chamberlain P, Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM. Design and analysis in dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson R, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press; 2012. p. 225-60.
19. Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Horwitz S, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt M, Landsverk J. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Heal Ment Heal Serv Res. 2010;38:44-53.
20. Proudfoot JG. Computer-based treatment for anxiety and depression: is it feasible? Is it effective? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28:353-63.
21. Kaltenthaler E, Brazier J, De Nigris E, Tumur I, Ferriter M, Beverley C, et al. Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for depression and anxiety update: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10:1-70.
22. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for depression and anxiety. London: NICE. Technology Appraisal Guidance [TA97]; 2013.
23. Spijker J, Bockting C, Meeuwissen J, van Vliet I, Emmelkamp P, Hermens M, et al. Multidisciplinaire richtlijn Depressie (Derde revisie). Richtlijn voor de diagnostiek, behandeling en begeleiding van volwassen patiënten met een depressieve stoornis [Multidisciplinary Guideline for Depression (Third Revision)]. Utrecht: Guideline for Diagnostics; 2013.
24. Kooistra LC, Wiersma JE, Ruwaard J, van Oppen P, Smit F, Lokkerbol J, et al. Blended vs. face-to-face cognitive behavioural treatment for major depression in specialized mental health care: study protocol of a randomized controlled cost-effectiveness trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:290.
25. van der Vaart R, Witting M, Riper H, Kooistra L, Bohlmeijer ET, van Gemert-Pijnen LJ. Blending online therapy into regular face-to-face therapy for depression: content, ratio and preconditions according to patients and therapists using a Delphi study. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:355.
26. Boersma P, van Weert JCM, Lakerveld J, Dröes R-M. The art of successful implementation of psychosocial interventions in residential dementia care: a systematic review of the literature based on the RE-AIM framework. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27:19-35.
27. Boersma P, van Weert JCM, van Meijel B, Dröes RM. Implementation of the Veder contact method in daily nursing home care for people with dementia: a process analysis according to the re-aim framework. J Clin Nurs. 2016. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13432.
28. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606-13.
29. John Rush A, Giles DE, Schlesser MA, Fulton CL, Weissenburger J, Burns C. The inventory for depressive symptomatology (IDS): preliminary findings. Psychiatry Res. 1986;18:65-87.
30. Rush A, Gullion C, Basco M, Jarrett R, Trivedi M. The inventory of depressive symptomatology (IDS): psychometric properties. Psychol Med. 1996;26:477-86.
31. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Ibrahim HM, Carmody TJ, Arnow B, Klein DN, et al. The 16-Item quick inventory of depressive symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:573-83.
32. Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann. 1979;2:197-207.
33. Brooke J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usabil Eval Ind. 1996;189:4-7.
34. Caracelli V, Greene J. Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1993;15:195-207.
35. Gaglio B, Glasgow R. Evaluation approaches for dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson R, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press; 2012. p. 327-58.
36. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2013.