Making text resources accessible to the reader: The case of patent claims

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1393-1400

  Mille, Simon ^a   Wanner, Leo ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; SYNTACTICS;

DISCOURSE MARKERS; INTERNATIONAL PATENTS; MEANING TEXTS; PATENT CLAIMS; REFERRING EXPRESSIONS; SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS; TEXT GENERATORS; TEXT STRUCTURE;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 84995646458     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Barzilay, R. & Lee, L. (2003). Learning to paraphrase: An unsupervised approach using multiple-sequence alignment. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pp. 16-23.
2. Bohnet, B. (2006). Textgenerierung durch Transduktion linguistischer Strukturen. DISKI 298. AKA: Berlin.
3. Bohnet, B., Langjahr, A. & Wanner, L. (2000). A development environment for an MTT-based sentence generator. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Natural Language Generation, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, pp. 260-263.
4. Bouayad-Agha, N., G. Ferraro, V. Vidal and L. Wanner. 2007. "The first steps towards a simplification system of patent's claims. Description and evaluation. " Submitted.
5. Clarke, J. and Lapata, M. (2006). Models for sentence compression: a comparison across domains, training requirements and evaluation measures. In Proceedings of COLING and ACL, pp. 377-384.
6. Dalianis, H. (1996). Concise Natural Language Generation from Formal Specifications. PhD Thesis. Department of Computer and System Sciences. Royal Institute of Technology. Stockholm.
7. Dorr, B., Green, R., Levin, L., Rambow, O., Farwell, D., Habash, N., Helmreich, S., Hovy, E., Miller, K. J., Mitamura, T., Reeder, F., & Siddharthan, A. (2004). Semantic Annotation and Lexico-Syntactic Paraphrase. In Proceedings of LREC.
8. Dras, M. (1999). Tree Adjoining Grammar and the Reluctant Paraphrasing of Text. Ph. D. thesis, Macquarie University.
9. Huang, X. and A. Fiedler. (1996). Paraphrasing and Aggregating Argumentative Text Using Text Structure. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation. Pp. 21-30. Herstmonceux Castle, UK.
10. Iordanskaja, L. R. Kittredge and A. Polguère. (1991). Lexical selection and paraphrase in a Meaning-Text generation model. In C. Paris, W. Swartout, and W. Mann (eds.). Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
11. Lin D. (1998). Dependency-based Evaluation of MINIPAR. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Evaluation of Parsing Systems.
12. Mann, W. and S. Thompson. 1987. Rhetorical structure theory: A theory of text organization. Technical report, Information Science Institute (ISI), University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
13. Mel'cuk, I. and L. Wanner. (2006). Syntactic Mismatches in Machine Translation. In Machine Translation 20(2), 81-138.
14. Marsi, E., E. Krahmer, and W. Bousma. (2007). Dependency-based paraphrasing for recognizing textual entailment. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, held in conjunction with the Annual Meeting of the ACL, Prague.
15. McKeown, K. R. (1979). Paraphrasing using given and new information in a question-answer system. In Proceedings of the ACL, pp. 67-72.
16. Meeter, M. and V. Shaked. (1988). Strategies for effective paraphrasing in Proceedings of COLING, 431-436.
17. Stede, M. (1996). Lexical paraphrases in multilingual sentence generation. In Machine Translation 11:75-107.
18. Wanner, L. et al. (2008). PATExpert: Towards Content-Oriented Patent Document Processing In World Patent Information Journal, 30(1):21-33.