A robust, format-agnostic scientific data transfer framework

Data Science Journal

Volumn 15, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Hester, James R ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANISATION   (Australia)

Author keywords

Data formats; Knowledge representation; Metadata; Ontology

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; METADATA; ONTOLOGY;

DATA FORMATS; DIFFRACTION IMAGES; FORMAT-INDEPENDENT; INTERMEDIATE FORMATS; MACHINE READABLE FORM; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; PROGRAMMING INTERFACE; TRANSFER STANDARD;

DATA TRANSFER;

EID: 84995566952     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16831470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2016-012     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bernstein, H J 2006 Classification and use of image data. In: Definition and Exchange of Crystallographic Data, vol. G of International Tables for Crystallography, 1st ed., pp. 199-205. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/97809553602060000739
2. Bernstein, H J, Sloan, J M, Winter, G, Richter, T S, Nexus International Advisory Committee and Committee for the Maintenance of the CIF Standard 2014 Coping with BIG DATA Image Formats: Integration of CBF, NeXus and HDF5, A Progress Report. Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/nexuscbf/home/presentation-foils/Integration-Poster-10May14-w-overlays.pdf.
3. Boulton, G 2012 Open your minds and share your results. Nature, 486(7404): 441-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/486441a
4. Gruber, T R 1993 A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2): 199-220. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008
5. Hall, S and McMahon, B (Eds.) 2005 Definition and exchange of crystallographic data, vol. G of International Tables for Crystallography. 1st ed. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer
6. Henley, S 2006 The problem of missing data in geoscience databases. Computers & Geosciences, 32(9): 1368-1377. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.12.008
7. Hitzler, P, Krötzsch, M, Parsia, B, Patel-Schneider, P and Rudolph, S 2012 OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer. Tech. rep., W3C. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-primer-20121211.
8. Könnecke, M, Akeroyd, F A, Bernstein, H J, Brewster, A S, Campbell, S I, Clausen, B, Cottrell, S, Hoffmann, J U, Jemian, P R, Männicke, D, Osborn, R, Peterson, P F, Richter, T, Suzuki, J, Watts, B, Wintersberger, E and Wuttke, J 2015 The NeXus data format. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 48(1): 301-305. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600576714027575
9. Kroon-Batenburg, L M J and Helliwell, J R 2014 Experiences with making diffraction image data available: what metadata do we need to archive? Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography, 70(10): 2502-2509. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1399004713029817
10. NIAC 2015 Nxmx - nexus: Manual 3.1 documentation. Available at: http://download.nexusformat.org/doc/html/classes/applications/NXmx.html.
11. Otero-Cerdeira, L, Rodríguez-Martínez, F J and Gómez-Rodríguez, A 2015 Ontology matching: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(2): 949-971. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417414005144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.032
12. Otwinowski, Z and Minor, W 2016 Detectors and formats recognised by the HKL/HKL-2000/HKL-3000 software. Available at: http://www.hkl-xray.com/detectors-formats-recognized-hklhkl-2000hkl-3000-software.
13. Shvaiko, P and Euzenat, J 2013 Ontology matching: State of the art and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 25(1): 158-176. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2011.253
14. Spadaccini, N, Castleden, I R, du Boulay, D and Hall, S R 2012 dREL: A relational expression language for dictionary methods. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 52(8): 1917-1925. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci300076w
15. Spadaccini, N and Hall, S R 2012 DDLm: A new dictionary definition language. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 52(8): 1907-1916. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci300075z
16. Spivak, D I 2012 Functorial data migration. Information and Computation, 217: 31-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2012.05.001
17. Spivak, D I 2014 Category Theory for the Sciences. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press. ISBN 9780262028134. Available at: http://category-theory.mitpress.mit.edu/.
18. Spivak, D I and Kent, R E 2012 Ologs: A categorical framework for knowledge representation. PLoS ONE, 7(1): e24274. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024274
19. Strickland, P, Hoyland, M A and McMahon, B 2005 Automated data validation: Checkcif. In: Definition and Exchange of Crystallographic Data, vol. G of International Tables for Crystallography, 1st ed., pp. 561-562.
20. The HDF Group 1997-2016 Hierarchical data format, version 5. Available at: http://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/.