Mapping of bioclimatic comfort for potential planning using GIS in Aydin

Environment, Development and Sustainability

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 361-375

  Cetin, Mehmet ^a   Adiguzel, Fatih ^b   Kaya, Omer ^c   Sahap, Ahmet ^d  

^a KASTAMONU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b MEHMET AKIF ERSOY UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c KAHRAMANMARAS SUTCU IMAM UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d HARRAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Aydin; Bioclimatic comfort; GIS; Landscape planning; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

BIOCLIMATOLOGY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE CONDITIONS; DESIGN; ENERGY BALANCE; GIS; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; MAPPING; PLANNING PROCESS; RESEARCH WORK; SUSTAINABILITY;

AYDIN; TURKEY;

EID: 84995528379     PISSN: 1387585X     EISSN: 15732975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-016-9885-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abbas, S., Qamer, F. M., Murthy, M. S., Tripathi, N. K., Ning, W., Sharma, E., et al. (2015). Grassland growth in response to climate variability in the Upper Indus Basin, Pakistan. Climate, 3(3), 697–714.
2. 2 sources and sinks nexus through integrated approach: Insight from Pakistan. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 22(2), 112–122.
3. Ali, G., Abbas, S., & Qamer, F. M. (2013). How effectively low carbon society development models contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation action plans in Asia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 632–638.
4. Altunkasa, M. F. (1990). Determination of climate-balanced urban green space planning principles in Adana and the example of multi-purpose development of a green field. Institutional Faculty of Agriculture, 5, 9–54.
5. Cetin, M. (2015). Determining the bioclimatic comfort in Kastamonu city. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(10), 640. doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4861-3.
6. Cetin, M., Topay, M., Kaya, L. G., & Yilmaz, B. (2010). Efficiency of bioclimatic comfort in landscape planning process: The case of Kutahya. Suleyman Demirel University. Journal of Faculty of Forestry, A(1), 83–95 (Isparta).
7. Cetin, M., & Zeren, I. (2016). Evaluation of the value of biocomfort for Kastamonu-Inebolu. In: International conference GREDIT’2016—Green development infrastructure technology, poster section 4: Management of urban and industrial waste, climate change—biodiversity—efficiency. ISBN 978-608-4624-21-9, 31.03 and 01.04 2016 (pp 4–35, p 310). Skopje, Macedonia.
8. Demir, M., Dindaroglu, T., & Guven, M. (2014). The importance of forest lands in terms of bioclimatic comfort: Sample of Aras Basin. Journal of Human Ecology, 45(1), 7–16.
9. Fanger, P. O. (1970). Analysis and applications in environmental engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
10. Gumus, A. E. (2012). Ankara comfort of bioclimatic analysis, SüleymanDemirel University. Journal of Faculty of Forestry, 13, 48–56 (in Turkish).
11. Kestane, O., & Ulgen, K. (2013). Determination of bioclimatic comfort zone for the province of Izmir, Suleyman Demirel University. Journal of Technical Sciences, 3(5), 18–25 (in Turkish).
12. Kocman, A. (1991). Affecting of Izmir’s urban development of natural environmental factors and problems related to them. Geography Research Journal, 3, 101 (in Turkish).
13. Lin, T. P., Matzarakis, A., & Huang, J. J. (2006). Thermal comfort and passive design strategy of bus shelters. In PLEA2006 - The 23rd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Geneva, Switzerland, 6–8 September 2006. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=425CC39668F071976EBAB5D9077E1EF0?doi=10.1.1.557.4187&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
14. Matzarakis, A., Rutz, F., & Mayer, H. (2010). Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments: Basics of the RayMan model. International Journal of Biometeorology, 54, 131–139.
15. Molla, N. A., Mollah, K. A., Ali, G., Fungladda, W., Shipin, O. V., Wongwit, W., et al. (2014). Quantifying disease burden among climate refugees using multidisciplinary approach: A case of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Urban Climate, 8, 126–137.
16. Nikolakis, D. J. (2007). A first theoretical comparison between current and future indoor thermal comfort conditions, in Greece, as a result of the greenhouse effect. Meteorological Applications, 14(2), 171–176.
17. Olgyay, V. (1973). Design with climate: bioclimatic approach to architectural regionalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18. Olgyay, V. (2015). Design with climate: bioclimatic approach to architectural regionalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19. Ozsahin, E., Kaymaz, C. K., & Albayrak, L. (2015). Analysis of the bioclimatical comfortable conditions of Artvin province and its importance in tourism. International Journal of Human Sciences, 2(2), 1050–1077.
20. Steadman, R. G. (1979). The assessment of sultriness, part I: temperature–humidity index based on human physiology and clothing science. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 18, 861–873.
21. Thom, E. C. (1959). The discomfort index. Wheather wise, 12, 57–60.
22. Topay, M. (2012). Importance of thermal comfort in the sustainable landscape planning. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 13(3), 1480–1487.
23. Topay, M. (2013). Mapping of thermal comfort for outdoor recreation planning using GIS: The case of Isparta Province (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37(1), 110–120.
24. Topay, M., & Parladir, M. O. (2015). Suitability analysis for alternative tourism activities with the help of GIS: A case study of Isparta province. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21(2), 300–309.
25. Toroglu, E., Adiguzel, F., & Kaya, O. (2015). Kizildag Plateau Karaisali-Adana. In: Highland culture and Transhumance symposium, Bilecik Seyh Edebali University Publications (Eds: HarunTuncel), 6–7 Nov 2014, Published on Mar 2015 (pp. 273–296). Bilecik (in Turkish).
26. Toy, S., & Yılmaz, S. (2009). The importance for bioclimatic comfort and living space in landscape design, Ataturk University. Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 40(1), 133–139.
27. TSMS. (2016). Turkish State Meteorology Affairs General Directorate of Aydin, Meteorology values of Aydin for 1960–2015 meteorological data.