Responsiveness and MCID Estimates for CAT, CCQ, and HADS in Patients With COPD Undergoing Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Prospective Analysis

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 53-58

  Smid, Dionne E ^a   Franssen, Frits M E ^a,b   Houben Wilke, Sarah ^a   Vanfleteren, Lowie E G W ^a,b   Janssen, Daisy J A ^a,b   Wouters, Emiel F M ^a,b   Spruit, Martijn A ^a,b  

^a CIRO   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

clinical significance; COPD; health status; health related quality of life; pulmonary rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPD ASSESSMENT TEST; COPD CLINICAL QUESTIONNAIRE; DEPRESSION; FAT FREE MASS; FEMALE; FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION SCALE; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; MODIFIED MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL SCALE; MOOD; OXYGEN SATURATION; PULMONARY REHABILITATION; REFERENCE VALUE; REHABILITATION PATIENT; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE ASSESSMENT; REST; SIX MINUTE WALK TEST; ST. GEORGE RESPIRATORY QUESTIONNAIRE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TREATMENT RESPONSE; AGED; HEALTH SURVEY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

AGED; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84995520606     PISSN: 15258610     EISSN: 15389375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. 1 Bratek, A., Zawada, K., Beil-Gawelczyk, J., et al. Depressiveness, symptoms of anxiety and cognitive dysfunctions in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): Possible associations with inflammation markers: A pilot study. J Neural Transm 122 (2015), S83–S91.
2. 2 Marin, J.M., Cote, C.G., Diaz, O., et al. Prognostic assessment in COPD: Health related quality of life and the BODE index. Respir Med 105 (2011), 916–921.
3. 3 Panagioti, M., Scott, C., Blakemore, A., et al. Overview of the prevalence, impact, and management of depression and anxiety in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 9 (2014), 1289–1306.
4. 4 Spruit, M.A., Singh, S.J., Garvey, C., et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: Key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188 (2013), e13–e64.
5. 5 Tsiligianni, I.G., van der Molen, T., Moraitaki, D., et al. Assessing health status in COPD. A head-to-head comparison between the COPD assessment test (CAT) and the clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ). BMC Pulm Med, 12, 2012, 20.
6. 6 Zigmond, A.S., Snaith, R.P., The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67 (1983), 361–370.
7. 7 Kiley, J.P., Sri Ram, J., Croxton, T.L., et al. Challenges associated with estimating minimal clinically important differences in COPD—The NHLBI perspective. COPD 2 (2005), 43–46.
8. 8 Spruit, M.A., Augustin, I.M., Vanfleteren, L.E., et al. Differential response to pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: Multidimensional profiling. Eur Respir J 46 (2015), 1625–1635.
9. 9 Revicki, D., Hays, R.D., Cella, D., et al. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 61 (2008), 102–109.
10. 10 Halme, A.S., Fritel, X., Benedetti, A., et al. Implications of the minimal clinically important difference for health-related quality-of-life outcomes: A comparison of sample size requirements for an incontinence treatment trial. Value Health 18 (2015), 292–298.
11. 11 Wilke, S., Jones, P.W., Mullerova, H., et al. One-year change in health status and subsequent outcomes in COPD. Thorax 70 (2015), 420–425.
12. 12 Jones, P.W., Beeh, K.M., Chapman, K.R., et al. Minimal clinically important differences in pharmacological trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189 (2014), 250–255.
13. 13 Jones, P.W., St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire: MCID. COPD 2 (2005), 75–79.
14. 14 Dodd, J.W., Hogg, L., Nolan, J., et al. The COPD assessment test (CAT): Response to pulmonary rehabilitation. A multicentre, prospective study. Thorax 66 (2011), 425–429.
15. 15 Jones, P.W., Harding, G., Wiklund, I., et al. Tests of the responsiveness of the COPD assessment test following acute exacerbation and pulmonary rehabilitation. Chest 142 (2012), 134–140.
16. 16 Kon, S.S., Canavan, J.L., Jones, S.E., et al. Minimum clinically important difference for the COPD Assessment Test: A prospective analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2 (2014), 195–203.
17. 17 Kon, S.S., Dilaver, D., Mittal, M., et al. The Clinical COPD Questionnaire: Response to pulmonary rehabilitation and minimal clinically important difference. Thorax 69 (2014), 793–798.
18. 18 Canavan, J.L., Dilaver, D., Clark, A.L., et al. Clinical COPD Questionnaire in patients with chronic respiratory disease. Respirology 19 (2014), 1006–1012.
19. 19 Puhan, M.A., Frey, M., Buchi, S., et al. The minimal important difference of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 6, 2008, 46.
20. 20 Kocks, J.W., Tuinenga, M.G., Uil, S.M., et al. Health status measurement in COPD: The minimal clinically important difference of the clinical COPD questionnaire. Respir Res, 7, 2006, 62.
21. 21 Wright, A., Hannon, J., Hegedus, E.J., et al. Clinimetrics corner: A closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). J Man Manip Ther 20 (2012), 160–166.
22. 22 Terwee, C.B., Roorda, L.D., Dekker, J., et al. Mind the MIC: Large variation among populations and methods. J Clin Epidemiol 63 (2010), 524–534.
23. 23 Smid, D.E., Wilke, S., Jones, P.W., et al. Impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and its responsiveness to pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: Protocol of the Chance study. BMJ Open, 5, 2015, e007536.
24. 24 Munnik, P., Zanen, P., Lammers, J.W., A comparison of lung function equipment with emphasis on interchangeability and methods. Physiol Meas 27 (2006), 445–455.
25. 25 Holland, A.E., Spruit, M.A., Troosters, T., et al. An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: Field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J 44 (2014), 1428–1446.
26. 26 Brant, R., Sutherland, L., Hilsden, R., Examining the minimum important difference. Stat Med 18 (1999), 2593–2603.
27. 27 Jones, P.W., Harding, G., Berry, P., et al. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. Eur Respir J 34 (2009), 648–654.
28. 28 van der Molen, T., Willemse, B.W., Schokker, S., et al. Development, validity and responsiveness of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 1, 2003, 13.
29. 29 Reda, A.A., Reliability and validity of the Ethiopian version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in HIV infected patients. PloS One, 6, 2011, e16049.
30. 30 Pepin, V., Laviolette, L., Brouillard, C., et al. Significance of changes in endurance shuttle walking performance. Thorax 66 (2011), 115–120.
31. 31 Gupta, N., Pinto, L.M., Morogan, A., et al. The COPD assessment test: A systematic review. Eur Respir J 44 (2014), 873–884.
32. 32 McCarthy, B., Casey, D., Devane, D., et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, CD003793.
33. 33 Copay, A.G., Subach, B.R., Glassman, S.D., et al. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: A review of concepts and methods. Spine J 7 (2007), 541–546.
34. 34 Lauridsen, H.H., Hartvigsen, J., Manniche, C., et al. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 7, 2006, 82.
35. 35 Mroczek, B., Sitko, Z., Augustyniuk, K., et al. Socioeconomic indicators shaping quality of life and illness acceptance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 861 (2015), 19–30.
36. 36 Bjoernshave, B., Korsgaard, J., Nielsen, C.V., Does pulmonary rehabilitation work in clinical practice? A review on selection and dropout in randomized controlled trials on pulmonary rehabilitation. Clin Epidemiol 2 (2010), 73–83.
37. 37 Schünemann, H.J., Griffith, L., Jaeschke, R., et al. Evaluation of the minimal important difference for the feeling thermometer and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with chronic airflow obstruction. J Clin Epidemiol 56 (2003), 1170–1176.