The Influence of Skin Redness on Blinding in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Studies: A Crossover Trial

Neuromodulation

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 248-255

  Ezquerro, Fernando ^a   Moffa, Adriano H ^a   Bikson, Marom ^b   Khadka, Niranjan ^b   Aparicio, Luana V M ^a   de Sampaio Junior, Bernardo ^a   Fregni, Felipe ^c   Bensenor, Isabela M ^a   Lotufo, Paulo A ^a   Pereira, Alexandre Costa ^a   Brunoni, Andre R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b City College of New York   (United States)

^c and Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Home Base Program   (United States)

Author keywords

Adverse effects; blinding; computer modeling; erythema; randomized controlled trials; skin redness; transcranial direct current stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; ELECTRODE; ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NEUROLOGICAL THERAPEUTIC DEVICE; NORMAL HUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SKIN REDNESS; SKIN TINGLING; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION SYSTEM; ADOLESCENT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; SKIN; TIME FACTOR; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; SKIN; TIME FACTORS; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84995470898     PISSN: 10947159     EISSN: 15251403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12527     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul 2012;5:175–195.
2. Tortella G, Casati R, Aparicio LV et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in psychiatric disorders. World J Psychiatry 2015;5:88–102.
3. Khadka N, Rahman A, Sarantos C, Truong DQ, Bikson M. Methods for specific electrode resistance measurement during transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul 2015;8:150–159.
4. Woods AJ, Antal A, Bikson M et al. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol 2016;127:1031–1048.
5. Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:845–850.
6. O'Connell NE, Cossar J, Marston L et al. Rethinking clinical trials of transcranial direct current stimulation: participant and assessor blinding is inadequate at intensities of 2mA. PLoS One 2012;7:e47514.
7. Ambrus GG, Al-Moyed H, Chaieb L, Sarp L, Antal A, Paulus W. The fade-in - short stimulation - fade out approach to sham tDCS - reliable at 1 mA for naive and experienced subjects, but not investigators. Brain Stimul 2012;5:499–504.
8. Palm U, Reisinger E, Keeser D et al. Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Brain Stimul 2013;6:690–695.
9. Guleyupoglu B, Febles N, Minhas P, Hahn C, Bikson M. Reduced discomfort during high-definition transcutaneous stimulation using 6% benzocaine. Front Neuroeng 2014;7:28.
10. Dundas JE, Thickbroom GW, Mastaglia FL. Perception of comfort during transcranial DC stimulation: effect of NaCl solution concentration applied to sponge electrodes. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118:1166–1170.
11. Guarienti F, Caumo W, Shiozawa P et al. Reducing transcranial direct current stimulation-induced erythema with skin pretreatment: considerations for sham-controlled clinical trials. Neuromodulation 2015;18:261–265.
12. Ambrus GG, Antal A, Paulus W. Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122:803–807.
13. Turi Z, Ambrus GG, Ho KA, Sengupta T, Paulus W, Antal A. When size matters: large electrodes induce greater stimulation-related cutaneous discomfort than smaller electrodes at equivalent current density. Brain Stimul 2014;7:460–467.
14. Brunoni AR, Amadera J, Berbel B, Volz MS, Rizzerio BG, Fregni F. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2011;14:1133–1145.
15. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health, 2008.
16. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol 1988;124:869–871.
17. Miranda PC, Lomarev M, Hallett M. Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:1623–1629.
18. Wagner T, Fregni F, Fecteau S, Grodzinsky A, Zahn M, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study. Neuroimage 2007;35:1113–1124.
19. Saturnino GB, Antunes A, Thielscher A. On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS. Neuroimage 2015;120:25–35.
20. Ferrell WR, Wong BB, Lockhart JC, Ramsay JE. Gender differences in regional cutaneous microcirculatory responses to capsaicin. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2004;18:195–200.
21. Kessler SK, Turkeltaub PE, Benson JG, Hamilton RH. Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul 2012;5:155–162.
22. Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull 2007;72:208–214.