Applying mixed methods under the framework of theory-driven evaluations

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 1997, Issue 74, 1997, Pages 61-72

  Chen, Huey Tsyh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84995448945     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1072     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Chen, H.-T. Theory-Driven Evaluations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1990.
2. Chen, H.-T. “Current Trends and Future Directions in Program Evaluation.” Evaluation Practice, 1994, 15 (3), 229–238.
3. Chen, H.-T. “Evaluating the Process and Outcome of a Garbage Reduction Program in Taiwan.” Evaluation Review, 1997, 21 (1), 27–42.
4. Chen, H.-T. “Normative Evaluation of an Anti–Drug Abuse Program.” Evaluation and Program Planning, in press.
5. Datta, L. “Paradigm Wars: A Basis for Peaceful Coexistence and Beyond.” In C. S. Reichardt and S. F. Rallis (eds.), The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 61. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
6. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., and Graham, W. F. “Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1989, 11 (3), 255–274.
7. Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1989.
8. Reichardt, C. S., and Rallis, S. F. (eds.). The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 61. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
9. Sechrest, L. “Roots: Back to Our First Generations.” Evaluation Practice, 1992, 13 (1), 1–7.