Privacy, cost, and availability tradeoffs in decentralized OSNs

SIGCOMM 2009 - Proceedings of the 2009 SIGCOMM Conference and Co-Located Workshops, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks, WOSN 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 13-18

  Shakimov, Amre ^a   Varshavsky, Alexander ^b   Cox, Landon P ^a   Cáceres, Ramón ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AT AND T LABS RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cloud Computing; Online Social Networks; Privacy; Replication; Utility Computing; Virtual Machines

Indexed keywords

CLOUD COMPUTING; COMMERCE; DATA PRIVACY; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; PEER TO PEER NETWORKS; SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

DECENTRALIZED OSNS; ON-LINE SOCIAL NETWORKS; ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKS (OSNS); PEER-TO-PEER OVERLAY NETWORKS; PRIVACY PRESERVING; REPLICATION; UTILITY COMPUTING; VIRTUAL MACHINES;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84995370788     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1592665.1592669     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. A. Adya, W. J. Bolosky, M. Castro, G. Cermak, R. Chaiken, J. R. Douceur, Jon, J. Howell, J. R. Lorch, M. Theimer, and R. P. Wattenhofer. Farsite: Federated, available, and reliable storage for an incompletely trusted environment. In Proc. of OSDI, 2002.
2. Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2). http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/.
3. Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3). http://aws.amazon.com/s3/.
4. Amazon Web Services Customer Agreement. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/agreement/.
5. S. Buchegger and A. Datta. A Case for P2P Infrastructure for Social Networks-Opportunities and Challenges. In WONS 2009, 6th International Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services, February 2-4, 2009, Snowbird, Utah, USA, Feb.
6. M. Castro, P. Druschel, A.-M. Kermarrec, and A. Rowstron. Scalable application-level anycast for highly dynamic groups. In Proc. of NGC, 2003.
7. comScore. http://www.comscore.com.
8. L. A. Cutillo, R. Molva, and T. Strufe. Privacy preserving social networking through decentralization. In WONS 2009, 6th International Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services, February 2-4, 2009, Snowbird, Utah, USA, Feb 2009.
9. Facebook. http://www.facebook.com.
10. S. Guha, K. Tang, and P. Francis. NOYB: Privacy in online social networks. In Proc. of WOSN, 2008.
11. LinkedIn. http://www.linkedin.com.
12. M. M. Lucas and N. Borisov. flyByNight: Mitigating the privacy risks of social networking. In Proc. of WPES, 2008.
13. J. Mickens and B. Noble. Exploiting availability prediction in distributed systems. In Proc. of NSDI, 2006.
14. Odnoklassniki. http://www.odnoklassniki.ru.
15. PlanetLab. http://www.planet-lab.org.
16. A. I. T. Rowstron and P. Druschel. Pastry: Scalable, decentralized object location, and routing for large-scale peer-To-peer systems. In Proc. of Middleware, 2001.
17. M. Satyanarayanan and et al. Pervasive personal computing in an Internet Suspend/Resume system. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(4), 2007.
18. A. Shakimov, H. Lim, L. P. Cox, and R. Cáceres. Vis-à-Vis: Online Social Networking via Virtual Individual Servers. Duke University Technical Report TR-2008-05, October 2008.
19. L. Story and B. Stone. Facebook retreats on online tracking. The New York Times. November 2007.
20. Vkontakte. http://www.vkontakte.ru.
21. B. White, J. Lepreau, L. Stoller, R. Ricci, S. Guruprasad, M. Newbold, M. Hibler, C. Barb, and A. Joglekar. An Integrated Experimental Environment for Distributed Systems and Networks. Proc. of OSDI 2002.