Group interaction analysis in mediated communication through observational measures;Análisis de la interacción grupal a través de medidas de observación en comunicación mediada

Revista de Psicologia Social

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 151-162

  Orengo, Virginia ^a   Zornoza, Ana ^a   Acín, Catherine ^a   Prieto, Fernando ^a   Peiró, José María ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Group interaction; Management conflict; Mediated communication; Observational measures; Uninhibited behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 84995339867     PISSN: 02134748     EISSN: 15793680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/02134749660569323     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ANDRIESSEN, E. y VANDERVELDEN, J. (1993). Team-work supported by interaction technology. Comunicación presentada al Sixt European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology (Organizado por la European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology). Alicante, 14-17 Abril.
2. BOTTGER, PC y YETTON, PW. (1988). A integration of process and decisions Scheme Explanations of group problem solving performance. Organizational behaviour and human decision processes, 42, 234–249.
3. DAFT, R.L. y LENGEL, R.H.(1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554–571.
4. DAFT, R.L.; LENGEL, R.H. y TREVINO, L.K. (1987). Message equivocality media selection and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 335–366.
5. DAVIS, K. (1972). Human behavior at work. Nueva York: McGraw Hill.
6. DIENER, E. (1979). Edindividuation, self-awaareness, and disinhibition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1160–1171.
7. GURNEE, H. (1937). A comparison of collective and group judgements of fact. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 437–444.
8. HALL, J. y WATSON, W.B. (1970). The Effects of a Normative Intervention on Group Decision-Making Performance. Human Relations, 23, 4, 299–317.
9. HILTZ, S.R. y TUROFF, M. (1978). The Network Nation-Human Communication via Computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. KIESLER, S. y SPROULL, L. (1992). Group Decision Making and Communication Technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 96–123.
11. KIESLER, S; SIEGEL, J. y MCGUIRE, T.W. (1984). Social Psychological Aspects of Computer Mediated Communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134.
12. LABERTH, J. (1980). Social Psychology. McMillan Publishing Co. Inc.
13. MCGRATH, J.E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
14. MOLL, R. RODRÍGUEZ-ALDEGUER, M. SUBIRATS, M MARTÍNEZ, I. y ORENGO, V. (1995). Fases en el proceso de interacción grupal y tencología de la comunicación. Trabajo presentado a I Symposium sobre Perspectives Psicosocials de la Conducta Laboral i Organitzacional, Benicasim, 5-7 de Junio.
15. SHAW, M.E. (1976). Group dynamics. The psychology of small group behavior. (2nd Ed.). Nueva York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
16. SHORT, J.; WILLIAMS, E. y CHRISTIE, B. (1976). The social psychology of Telecommunications. Londres: John Wiley & Sons.
17. SIEGEL, J.; DUBROVSKY, V.; KIESLER, S. y MCGUIRE, T. (1986). Group Processes in computer-mediated Communication. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157–187.
18. SMOLENSKY, M.W.; CARMODY, M.A. y HALCOMB, C.G. (1990). The Influence of Task Type, Group Structure and Extraversion on Uninhibited Speech in Computer-Mediated Communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 261–272.
19. SPROULL, L. y KIESLER, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32,1492–1513.
20. STEINER, I.D. (1972). Group process and productivity. Nueva York: Academic Press.
21. WEIMER, J. (1988). Machiavellianism and computer-mediated communication: An experiment in the software psychology of terminal to toerminal communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas, Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
22. ZORNOZA, A. (1992). La toma de decisiones en grupo. Efectos diferenciales del canal de comunicación sobre el rendimiento grupal. Tesis doctoral, Octubre, Valencia.
23. ZORNOZA, A.; ORENGO, V.; SALANOVA, M.; PEIRÓ, J.M. y PRIETO, F. (1993). Procesos de status, liderazgo e influencia en la comunicación mediada. Trabajo presentado en el IV Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social, Sevilla, Septiembre.