Patient autonomy–centered self-care checklist reduces hospital readmissions after ileostomy creation

Surgery (United States)

Volumn 160, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1302-1308

  Hardiman, Karin M ^a   Reames, Christina D ^a   McLeod, Marshall C ^a   Regenbogen, Scott E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE INFECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; ICD-9; ILEOSTOMY; INTESTINE PERFORATION; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELF CARE; SEPTICEMIA; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLON RESECTION; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COHORT STUDIES; COLECTOMY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT READMISSION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF CARE;

EID: 84994894130     PISSN: 00396060     EISSN: 15327361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. 1 Kiran, R.P., Delaney, C.P., Senagore, A.J., Steel, M., Garafalo, T., Fazio, V.W., Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 198 (2004), 877–883.
2. 2 Greenblatt, D.Y., Weber, S.M., O'Connor, E.S., LoConte, N.K., Liou, J.I., Smith, M.A., Readmission after colectomy for cancer predicts one-year mortality. Ann Surg 251 (2010), 659–669.
3. 3 Wick, E.C., Shore, A.D., Hirose, K., Ibrahim, A.M., Gearhart, S.L., Efron, J., et al. Readmission rates and cost following colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 54 (2011), 1475–1479.
4. 4 Messaris, E., Sehgal, R., Deiling, S., Koltun, W.A., Stewart, D., McKenna, K., et al. Dehydration is the most common indication for readmission after diverting ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum 55 (2012), 175–180.
5. 5 O'Connor, G., Teaching stoma-management skills: The importance of self-care. Br J Nurs 14 (2005), 320–324.
6. 6 Nagle, D., Pare, T., Keenan, E., Marcet, K., Tizio, S., Poylin, V., Ileostomy pathway virtually eliminates readmissions for dehydration in new ostomates. Dis Colon Rectum 55 (2012), 1266–1272.
7. 7 Hendren, S., Hammond, K., Glasgow, S.C., Perry, W.B., Buie, W.D., Steele, S.R., et al. Clinical practice guidelines for ostomy surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 58 (2015), 375–387.
8. 8 Younis, J., Salerno, G., Fanto, D., Hadjipavlou, M., Chellar, D., Trickett, J.P., Focused preoperative patient stoma education, prior to ileostomy formation after anterior resection, contributes to a reduction in delayed discharge within the enhanced recovery programme. Int J Colorectal Dis 27 (2012), 43–47.
9. 9 Phatak, U.R., Kao, L.S., You, Y.N., Rodriguez-Bigas, M.A., Skibber, J.M., Feig, B.W., et al. Impact of ileostomy-related complications on the multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21 (2014), 507–512.
10. 10 Bekkers, M.J., van Knippenberg, F.C., van den Borne, H.W., van Berge-Henegouwen, G.P., Prospective evaluation of psychosocial adaptation to stoma surgery: The role of self-efficacy. Psychosom Med 58 (1996), 183–191.
11. 11 Haynes, A.B., Weiser, T.G., Berry, W.R., Lipsitz, S.R., Breizat, A.H., Dellinger, E.P., et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360 (2009), 491–499.
12. 12 Basoor, A., Doshi, N.C., Cotant, J.F., Saleh, T., Todorov, M., Choksi, N., et al. Decreased readmissions and improved quality of care with the use of an inexpensive checklist in heart failure. Congest Heart Fail 19 (2013), 200–206.
13. 13 Haugen, A.S., Softeland, E., Almeland, S.K., Sevdalis, N., Vonen, B., Eide, G.E., et al. Effect of the world health organization checklist on patient outcomes: A stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 261 (2015), 821–828.
14. 14 Soong, C., Daub, S., Lee, J., Majewski, C., Musing, E., Nord, P., et al. Development of a checklist of safe discharge practices for hospital patients. J Hosp Med 8 (2013), 444–449.
15. 15 Bellomo, R., Ronco, C., Kellum, J.A., Mehta, R.L., Palevsky, P., Acute renal failure—Definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: The second international consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality initiative (ADQI) group. Crit Care 8 (2004), R204–R212.
16. 16 Osborne, N.H., Nicholas, L.H., Ryan, A.M., Thumma, J.R., Dimick, J.B., Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 313 (2015), 496–504.
17. 17 Ryan, A.M., Burgess, J.F. Jr., Dimick, J.B., Why we should not be indifferent to specification choices for difference-in-differences. Health Serv Res 50 (2015), 1211–1235.
18. 18 Dimick, J.B., Ryan, A.M., Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: The difference-in-differences approach. JAMA 312 (2014), 2401–2402.