Operating Room-To-ICU patient handovers: A multidisciplinary human-centered design approach

Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

Volumn 42, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 400-409

  Segall, Noa ^a   Bonifacio, Alberto S ^b   Barbeito, Atilio ^c   Schroeder, Rebecca A ^c   Perfect, Sharon R ^c   Wright, Melanie C ^d   Emery, James D ^e   Atkins, B Zane ^f   Taekman, Jeffrey M ^g   Mark, Jonathan B ^h  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HOSPITALS   (United States)

^c DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Saint Alphonsus Health System   (United States)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g Department of Anesthesiology   (United States)

^h DUMC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL HANDOVER; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; NORTH CAROLINA; OPERATING ROOM; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; STANDARDS;

ANTHROPOLOGY, CULTURAL; HOSPITALS, VETERANS; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; NORTH CAROLINA; OPERATING ROOMS; PATIENT HANDOFF;

EID: 84994875716     PISSN: 15537250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42081-7     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Segall N, et al. Can we make postoperative patient handovers safer? A systematic review of the literature. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:102-115.
2. Catchpole KR, et al. Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: Using Formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17:470-478.
3. Mistry KP, et al. Using Six Sigma R methodology to improve handoff communication in high-risk patients. In Henriksen K, et al., editors: Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches, vol. 3: Performance and Tools. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.
4. Craig R, et al. Strengthening handover communication in pediatric cardiac intensive care. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22:393-399.
5. Joy BF, et al. Standardized multidisciplinary protocol improves handover of cardiac surgery patients to the intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12:304-308.
6. Zavalkoff SR, et al. Handover after pediatric heart surgery: A simple tool improves information exchange. Pediatr Crit Care Med .2011;12:309-313.
7. Boat AC, Spaeth JP. Handoff checklists improve the reliability of patient handoffs in the operating room and postanesthesia care unit. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013;23:647-654.
8. Grover A, Duggan E. Chinese whispers in the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Ir Med J. 2013;106:241-243.
9. Karakaya A, et al. Implementation of a structured information transfer checklist improves postoperative data transfer after congenital cardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30:764-769.
10. Agarwal HS, et al. Standardized postoperative handover process improves outcomes in the intensive care unit: A model for operational sustainability and improved team performance. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2109-2115.
11. Kaufman J, et al. A handoff protocol from the cardiovascular operating room to cardiac ICU is associated with improvements in care beyond the immediate postoperative period. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39:306-311.
12. Nagpal K, et al. Improving postoperative handover: A prospective observational study. Am J Surg. 2013;206:494-501.
13. Weinger MB, et al. Improving actual handover behavior with a simulation-based training intervention. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2010;54:957-961.
14. Petrovic MA, et al. Pilot implementation of a perioperative protocol to guide operating room-To-intensive care unit patient handoffs. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:11-16.
15. Vergales J, et al. Face-To-face handoff: Improving transfer to the pediatric intensive care unit after cardiac surgery. Am J Med Qual. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
16. Caruso TJ, et al. Implementation of a standardized postanesthesia care handoff increases information transfer without increasing handoff duration. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015;41:35-42.
17. Randmaa M, et al. SBAR improves communication and safety climate and decreases incident reports due to communication errors in an anaesthetic clinic: A prospective intervention study. BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 21;4:e004268.
18. Petrovic MA, Martinez EA, Aboumatar H. Implementing a perioperative handoff tool to improve postprocedural patient transfers. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012;38:135-142.
19. Weinger MB, et al. A multimodal intervention improves postanesthesia care unit handovers. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:957-971.
20. Petrovic MA, et al. The perioperative handoff protocol: Evaluating impacts on handoff defects and provider satisfaction in adult perianesthesia care units. J Clin Anesth. 2015;27:111-119.
21. Breuer RK, et al. Standardizing postoperative PICU handovers improves handover metrics and patient outcomes. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16:256-263.
22. Randmaa M, et al. Implementing situation-background-Assessment-recommendation in an anaesthetic clinic and subsequent information retention among receivers: A prospective interventional study of postoperative handovers. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33:172-178.
23. Fabila TS, et al. Improving postoperative handover from anaesthetists to non-Anaesthetists in a children's intensive care unit: The receiver's perception. Singapore Med J. 2016;57:242-253.
24. Moon TS, et al. Improving the quality of the operating room to intensive care unit handover at an urban teaching hospital through a bundled intervention. J Clin Anesth. 2016;31:5-12.
25. Yang JG, Zhang J. Improving the postoperative handover process in the intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25:1062-1072.
26. Funk E, et al. Structured handover in the pediatric postanesthesia care unit. J Perianesth Nurs. 2016;31:63-72.
27. Salzwedel C, et al. The effect of a checklist on the quality of patient handover from the operating room to the intensive care unit: A randomized controlled trial. J Crit Care. 2016;32:170-174.
28. Rouse WB. Design for Success: A Human-Centered Approach to Designing Successful Products and Systems. New York City: Wiley: 1991.
29. Bannon LJ. Issues in design: Some notes. In Norman DA, Draper SW, editors: User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986, 25-30.
30. Gould JD, Boies SJ, Ukelson J. How to design usable systems. In Helander MG, Landauer TK, Prabhu PV, editors: Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997, 231-254.
31. Johnson CM, Johnson TR, Zhang J. A user-centered framework for redesigning health care interfaces. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38:75-87.
32. Abras C, Maloney-Krichmar D, Preece J. User-centered design. In Bainbridge WS, editor: Berkshire Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group, 2004, 463-468.
33. Klinger DW, et al. Designing for Performance: A Cognitive Systems Engineering Approach to Modifying an AWACS Human Computer Interface. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Armstrong Laboratory, 1993.
34. Jungk A, et al. Evaluation of two new ecological interface approaches for the anesthesia workplace. J Clin Monit Comput. 2000;16:243-258.
35. Endsley MR, et al. Situation Awareness in Air Traffic Control: Enhanced Displays for Advanced Operations. Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center, 2000.
36. Britto MT, et al. Usability testing finds problems for novice users of pediatric portals. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:660-669.
37. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 9241-210:2010: Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Geneva: ISO, 2010.
38. Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock PA, Meshkati N, editors: Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1988. 139-183.
39. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277-1288.
40. Mistry KP, et al. Communication error during post-operative patient hand off in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2005;33 Suppl 12:A12.
41. McElroy LM, et al. Clinician perceptions of operating room to intensive care unit handoffs and implications for patient safety: A qualitative study. Am J Surg. 2015; 210:629-635.
42. McElroy LM, et al. Operating room to intensive care unit handoffs and the risks of patient harm. Surgery. 2015;158:588-594.
43. Arenas A, et al. Undivided attention improves postoperative anesthesia handover recall. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014 Jul 10;5:215-220.
44. Gould JD, Lewis C. Designing for usability-Key principles and what designers think. Commun ACM. 1985;28:300-311.
45. Ching JM, et al. Using lean "automation with a human touch" to improve medication safety: A step closer to the "perfect dose." Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014;40:341-350.
46. Lin M, et al. Nurse Knowledge Exchange Plus: Human-centered implementation for spread and sustainability. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015;41:303-312.
47. van Rensen EL, et al. Multitasking during patient handover in the recovery room. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:1183-1187.
48. Neily J, et al. Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA. 2010 Oct 20;304:1693-1700.
49. Aiken LH, et al. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA. 2002 Oct 23-30;288:1987-1993.