Operational modal analysis of a high-rise multi-function building with dampers by a Bayesian approach

Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Volumn 86, Issue , 2017, Pages 286-307

  Ni, Yanchun ^a   Lu, Xilin ^a   Lu, Wensheng ^a  

^a Tongji University ^*  (China)

Author keywords

Bayesian; High rise building; Modal identification; Shaking table test; Vibration test

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; BUILDINGS; COMPOSITE BEAMS AND GIRDERS; DAMAGE DETECTION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ENERGY DISSIPATION; FLOORS; HEALTH RISKS; MODAL ANALYSIS; OFFICE BUILDINGS; STATISTICAL TESTS; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS); TALL BUILDINGS; TESTING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BAYESIAN; HIGH RISE BUILDING; MODAL IDENTIFICATION; SHAKING TABLE TESTS; VIBRATION TEST;

VIBRATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84994783044     PISSN: 08883270     EISSN: 10961216     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. [1] Brownjohn, J.M.W., Moyo, P., Omenzetter, P., Chakraborty, S., Lessons from monitoring the performance of highway bridge. Struct. Control Health Monit. 12 (2005), 227–244.
2. [2] Chang, P.C., Flatau, A., Liu, S.C., Health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Struct. Health Monit. 2:3 (2003), 257–267.
3. [3] Ko, J.M., Ni, Y.Q., Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges. Eng. Struct. 27:12 (2005), 1715–1725.
4. [4] Ni, Y.Q., Xia, Y., Lin, W., Chen, W.H., Ko, J.M., SHM benchmark for high-rise structures: a reduced-order finite element model and field measurement data. Smart Struct. Syst. 10:4 (2012), 411–426.
5. [5] H. Sohn, C.R. Farrar, F.M. Hemez, D.D. Shunk, D.W. Stinemates, B.R. Nadler, A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, 2003, LA-13976-MS.
6. [6] Perez-Ramireza, C.A., Amezquita-Sancheza, J.P., Adelib, H., Valtierra-Rodrigueza, M., Camarena-Martinezc, D., Romero-Troncoso, R.J., New methodology for modal parameters identification of smart civil structures using ambient vibrations and synchrosqueezed wavelet transform. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 48 (2016), 1–12.
7. [7] Chatzi, E.N., Fuggini, C., Online correction of drift in structural identification using artificial white noise observations and an unscented Kalman Filter. Smart Struct. Syst. 16:2 (2015), 295–328.
8. [8] Costaa, C., Ribeirob, D., Jorgec, P., Silvac, R., Calçadac, R., Arêde, A., Calibration of the numerical model of a short-span masonry railway bridge based on experimental modal parameters. Procedia Eng. 114 (2015), 846–853.
9. [9] Stache, M., Guettler, M., Marburg, S., A precise non-destructive damage identification technique of long and slender structures based on modal data. J. Sound Vib. 365 (2016), 89–101.
10. [10] Friswell, M.I., Mottershead, J.E., Inverse methods in structural health monitoring. Key Eng. Mater. 204 (2001), 201–210.
11. [11] Alvandi, A., Cremona, C., Assessment of vibration-based damage identification techniques. J. Sound Vib. 292 (2006), 179–202.
12. [12] Katafygiotis, L.S., Yuen, K.V., Bayesian spectral density approach for modal updating using ambient data. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30 (2001), 1103–1123.
13. [13] Dervilis, N., Worden, K., Cross, E.J., On robust regression analysis as a means of exploring environmental and operational conditions for SHM data. J. Sound Vib. 347 (2015), 279–296.
14. [14] Spiridonakos, M., Chatzi, E., Sudret, B., Polynomial chaos expansion models for the monitoring of structures under operational variability. J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng., 2016, 10.1061/ AJRUA6.0000872 [B4016003].
15. [15] Kullaa, J., Distinguishing between sensor fault, structural damage, and environmental or operational effects in structural health monitoring. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 25:8 (2011), 2976–2989.
16. [16] Jaishi, B., Kim, H.J., Kim, M.K., Ren, W.X., Lee, S.H., Finite element model updating of concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge under operational condition using modal flexibility. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 21:6 (2007), 2406–2426.
17. [17] Cho, S., Spencer, B.F., Sensor attitude correction of wireless sensor network for acceleration-based monitoring of civil structures. Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 30 (2015), 859–871.
18. [18] Reynders, E., Maes, K., Lombaert, G., De Roeck, G., Uncertainty quantification in operational modal analysis with stochastic subspace identification: validation and applications. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 66–67 (2016), 13–30.
19. [19] Li, H., Ou, J., Zhao, X., Zhou, W., Li, H., Zhou, Z., Yang, Y., Structural health monitoring system for the Shandong Binzhou Yellow River highway bridg. Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 21:4 (2006), 306–317.
20. [20] Ubertini, F., Gentile, C., Materazzi, A.L., Automated modal identification in operational conditions and its application to bridges. Eng. Struct. 46:1 (2013), 264–278.
21. [21] Gonilhaa, J.A., Correiaa, J.R., Brancoa, F.A., Caetanob, E., Cunha, Á., Modal identification of a GFRP-concrete hybrid footbridge prototype: experimental tests and analytical and numerical simulations. Compos. Struct. 106 (2013), 724–733.
22. [22] Shi, W.X., Shan, J.Z., Lu, X.L., Modal identification of Shanghai World Financial Center both from free and ambient vibration response. Eng. Struct. 36 (2012), 14–26.
23. [23] Au, S.K., Ni, Y.C., Zhang, F.L., Lam, H.F., Full-scale dynamic testing and modal identification of a coupled floor slab system. Eng. Struct. 37 (2012), 167–178.
24. [24] Grosela, J., Sawicki, W., Pakos, W., Application of classical and operational modal analysis for examination of engineering structures. Procedia Eng. 91 (2014), 136–141.
25. [25] Au, S.K., Ni, Y.C., Fast Bayesian modal identification of structures using known single-input forced vibration data. Struct. Control Health Monit. 21:3 (2014), 381–402.
26. [26] Yuen, K.V., Kuok, S.C., Ambient in terference in long-term monitoring of buildings. Eng. Struct. 32 (2010), 2379–2386.
27. [27] Au, S.K., Zhang, F.L., Ni, Y.C., Bayesian operational modal analysis: theory, computation, practice. Comput. Struct. 126 (2013), 3–15.
28. [28] Yan, W.J., Katafygiotis, L.S., A two-stage fast Bayesian spectral density approach for ambient modal analysis. Part I: most probable values and posterior uncertainty. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 54 (2015), 139–155.
29. [29] Yan, W.J., Katafygiotis, L.S., A two-stage fast Bayesian spectral density approach for ambient modal analysis. Part II: mode shape assembly and case studies. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 54 (2015), 156–171.
30. [30] Yuen, K.V., Katafygiotis, L.S., Bayesian Fast Fourier Transform approach for modal updating using ambient data. Adv. Struct. Eng. 6:2 (2003), 81–95.
31. [31] Sepahvand, K., Marburg, S., Identification of composite uncertain material parameters from experimental modal data. Probab. Eng. Mech. 37 (2014), 148–153.
32. [32] Pintelon, R., Guillaume, P., Schoukens, J., Uncertainty calculation in (operational) modal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 21:6 (2007), 2359–2373.
33. [33] Zhang, F.L., Au, S.K., A probabilistic model for modal properties based on operational modal analysis. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng., 2015, 10.1061/AJRUA6.0000843.
34. [34] Au, S.K., Fast Bayesian FFT method for ambient modal identification with separated modes. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 137 (2011), 214–226.
35. [35] Zhang, F.L., Au, S.K., Erratum for Fast Bayesian FFT method for ambient modal identification with separated modes by Siu-Kui Au. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE, 139, 2013 (545-545).
36. [36] Au, S.K., Fast Bayesian ambient modal identification in the frequency domain, part I: posterior most probable value. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 26 (2012), 60–75.
37. [37] Au, S.K., Fast Bayesian ambient modal identification in the frequency domain, part II: posterior uncertainty. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 26 (2012), 76–90.
38. [38] Zhang, F.L., Ni, Y.Q., Ni, Y.C., Mode identifiability of a cable-stayed bridge based on a Bayesian method. Smart Struct. Syst., 2016, 10.12989/sss.2016.17.3.000.
39. [39] Ni, Y.C., Zhang, F.L., Lam, H.F., Series of full-scale field vibration tests and Bayesian modal identification of a pedestrian bridge. J. Bridge Eng. ASCE, 2016, 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943- 5592.
40. [40] Ni, Y.C., Lu, X.L., Lu, W.S., Field dynamic test and Bayesian modal identification of a special structure-the Palms Together Dagoba. Struct. Control Health Monit., 2016, 10.1002/stc.1816.
41. [41] Zhang, F.L., Ni, Y.Q., Ni, Y.C., Wang, Y.W., Operational modal analysis of Canton Tower by a fast frequency domain Bayesian method. Smart Struct. Syst. 17:2 (2016), 209–230.
42. [42] Zhang, F.L., Xiong, H.B., Shi, W.X., Ou, X., Structural health monitoring of a super tall building during different stages using a Bayesian approach. Struct. Control Health Monit., 2016, 10.1002/stc.1840.
43. [43] Au, S.K., Zhang, F.L., To, P., Field observations on modal properties of two super tall buildings under strong wind. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 101 (2012), 12–23.
44. [44] Au, S.K., Zhang, F.L., Ambient modal identification of a primary-secondary structure by fast Bayesian FFT method. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 28 (2012), 280–296.
45. [45] Lu, X.L., Zou, Y., Lu, W.S., Zhao, B., Shaking table model test on Shanghai World Financial Center Tower. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (2007), 439–457.
46. [46] Benedetti, D., Carydis, P., Pezzoli, P., Shaking table tests on 24 simple masonry buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 27 (1998), 67–90.
47. [47] Dolce, M., Cardone, D., Ponzo, F.C., Valente, C., Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34 (2005), 1687–1717.
48. [48] Meng, C.G., Ding, J.M., Lu, X.L., Lu, W.S., Zhao, B., Shaking table experimental study of a high rise building of concrete filled square steel tubular frame structure with dampers. Struct. Eng. 21:5 (2005), 57–62.
49. [49] Au, S.K., Assembling mode shapes by least squares. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 25:1 (2011), 163–179.