Towards principled Responsible Research and Innovation: employing the Difference Principle in funding decisions

Journal of Responsible Innovation

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 169-183

  Schroeder, Doris ^a,b,c   Ladikas, Miltos ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (Cyprus)

^c CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994743176     PISSN: 23299460     EISSN: 23299037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1057798     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alter, Rolf. 2010. “Clearer lobbying for cleaner policymaking.” OECD Observer. Accessed October 25, 2014. http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/archivestory.php/aid/3254/%20Clearer_lobbying_for_cleaner_policymaking.htm.
2. Brownlie, Ian. 2003. Principles of Public International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Cantor, Eric, and Lamar, Smith. 2013. “Eric Cantor and Lamar Smith: Rethinking Science Funding.” 30 September 2013. Accessed December 28, 2014. http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/09/30/cantor-gop-budget-science-spending-column/2896333/.
4. Coles, D., M., Davis, M., Engelhard, B., Han, A., Kumar, K., Laas, M., Ladikas, et al. 2014a. Innovation for Society. Report for FP7 Project “Progress”, progressproject.eu. Accessed January 8, 2015. http://www.progressproject.eu/project-deliverables/.
5. Coles, D., M., Engelhard, B., Han, A., Kumar, K., Laas, M., Ladikas, R., Lin, et al. 2014b. RRI Country Requirements Matrix. Report for FP7 Project “Progress”, progressproject.eu. Accessed April 29, 2015. http://www.progressproject.eu/project-deliverables/.
6. Cozzens, Susan E., 2007. “Distributive Justice in Science and Technology Policy.” Science and Public Policy 34 (2): 85–94. doi: 10.3152/030234207X193619
7. Cribb, Alan. 2010. “Translational Ethics? The Theory–practice Gap in Medical Ethics.” Journal of Medical Ethics 36: 207–210. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.029785
8. Decker, M., and M., Ladikas, eds. 2004. Bridges between Science, Society and Policy; Technology Assessment–Methods and Impacts. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
9. De Waal, Frans. 2009. The Age of Empathy. New York: Harmony Books.
10. Douglas, Heather. 2014. “The Moral Terrain of Science.” Erkenntnis 79 (5 Supplement): 961–979. doi: 10.1007/s10670-013-9538-0
11. Eupha. 2013. Joint Statement of the Public Health Associations of Europe (IEA, ISEE, EUPHA) on the health research programme 2014–2015 (Horizon2020) proposed by the European Commission. Accessed October 25, 2014. http://www.eupha.org/repository/publications/joint_statement_IEA_ISEE_EUPHA_30_Sep_2013.pdf.
12. European Commission. 2010. “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union SEC(2010) 1161”.
13. European Parliament. 2001. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Accessed October 25, 2014. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/default_en.htm.
14. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. n.d. “Energy and Environmental Technology: Pioneer in Europe.” Accessed December 27, 2014. http://www.make-it-in-germany.com/en/for-qualified-professionals/working/industry-profiles/energy-and-environmental-technology-pioneer-in-europe.
15. Follesdal, Andreas, and Thomas, Pogge. 2005. “Introduction.” In Real World Justice, edited by Andreas, Follesdal and Thomas, Pogge, 1–19. Berlin: Springer.
16. Gordon, David. 2008. “Going off the Rawls.” The American Conservative. Accessed January 8, 2014. http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/going-off-the-rawls/.
17. Guston, David, and Sarewitz, Daniel. 2002. “Real-time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24: 93–109. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1
18. Holbrook, J. Britt, and Adam, Briggle. 2004. “Knowledge Kills Action–Why Principles Should Play a Limited Role in Policy-Making.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 51–66. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882554
19. Karapiperis, T., and Miltos, Ladikas. 2004. “Organised Interests in S&T Policy; the Influence of Lobby Activities.” In Bridges between Science, Society and Policy; Technology Assessment–Methods and Impacts, edited by Michael, Decker and Miltos, Ladikas, 102–129. Heidelberg: Springer.
20. Lanczkowski Guenter. 1989. Geschichte der nichtchristlichen Religionen. Frankfurt: Fischer.
21. Ledford, Heidi. 2011. “Translational Research: 4 Ways to Fix the Clinical Trial.” Nature 477: 526–528. doi: 10.1038/477526a
22. Lund Declaration. n.d. Accessed October 25, 2014. http://www.vr.se/inenglish/aboutus/policies/lunddeclaration.4.44482f6612355bb5ee780003083.html.
23. MacDonnell, Tim. 2014. “Taking Research for Granted - Texas Republican Lamar Smith Continues His Crusade against Independence in Science. 21 October 2014.” Accessed December 28, 2014. http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/climate_desk/2014/10/science_funding_lamar_smith_continues_the_republican_crusade_against_research.html.
24. MVI. 2014. “Calls for Proposals - Responsible Innovation.” Accessed 8 January, 2015. http://www.nwo.nl/en/funding/our-funding-instruments/gw/responsible-innovation/responsible-innovation.html.
25. Nussbaum, Martha. 1999. Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Owen, Richard, Jack, Stilgoe, Phil, Macnaghten, Mike, Gorman, Erik, Fisher, and Dave, Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by Richard, Owen, John, Bessant, and Maggy, Heintz, 27–50. London: John Wiley.
27. Ozolina, Zaneta, Carl, Mitcham, Doris, Schroeder, Emilio, Mordini, Paul, McCarthy, and John, Crowley. 2012. Ethical and Regulatory Challenges to Science and Research Policy at the Global Level, Expert Group report, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation of the European Commission. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
28. Polanyi, Michael. 1962. “The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory”. Accessed October 25. http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/envs_5100/polanyi_1967.pdf.
29. Pomerleau, Wayne. 2013. “Western Theories of Justice”. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed October 24. http://www.iep.utm.edu/justwest.
30. Rawls, John. 1997. “Justice as Fairness.” In Contemporary Political Philosophy, edited by Robert, Goodin and Philip, Pettit, 187–202. Oxford: Blackwell.
31. Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice–Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. REF. 2011. “Assessment Framework and Guidance on Submissions.” Accessed October 24. http://www.ref.ac.uk/pubs/2011-02.
33. Resnik, David, and Adil, Shamoo. 2011. “The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity.” Accountability in Research 18: 71–75. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2011.557296
34. Schot, Johan, and Arie, Rip. 1996. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54: 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
35. Schroeder, Doris, and Virgil, Rerimassie. 2015. “Science and Technology Governance and European Values.” In Science and Technology Governance and Ethics, edited by Miltos, Ladikas, Sachin, Chaturvedi, Yandong, Zhao, Dirk, Stemerding, 53–72. Berlin: Springer.
36. Shultz, David. 2014. “Science Insider - Breaking News and Analysis from the World of Science Policy.” October 2014. Accessed December 28. http://news.sciencemag.org/policy/2014/10/battle-between-nsf-and-house-science-committee-escalates-how-did-it-get-bad.
37. Smit, Ton. 2010. “Dutch EHR Plans Put on Hold.” Ehealth INSIDER. Accessed October 24. http://www.ehi.co.uk/insight/analysis/608/dutch-ehr-plans-put-on-hold.
38. Stilgoe, Jack. 2013. “Foreword: Why Responsible Innovation?” In Responsible Innovation edited by Richard, Owen, John, Bessant, and Maggy, Heintz, xi–xv. London: John Wiley.
39. Van den Hoven, Jeroen, Klaus, Jacob, Linda, Nielsen, Françoise, Roure, Laima, Rudze, and Jack, Stilgoe. 2013. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Science in Society.
40. Van Parijs, Philippe. 2003. “Difference Principles.” In Cambridge Companion to John Rawls, edited by Samuel, Freeman, 200–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Von Glasenapp, Helmuth. 1996. Die fuenf Weltreligionen. Muenchen: Eugen Diederichs Verlag.
42. Von Schomberg, Rene. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by Richard, Owen, John, Bessant, and Maggy, Heintz, 51–74. London: John Wiley.
43. Weitz Burkhard. 2011. Nachgefragt: Weltreligionen. Berlin: Zentralen fuer Politische Bildung.
44. Wellcome Trust. n.d. “Our Vision.” Accessed October 24. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/Our-vision/index.htm.
45. Woodhouse, Edward, and Daniel, Sarewitz. 2007. “Science Policies for Reducing Societal Inequities.” Science and Public Policy 34 (3): 139–150. doi: 10.3152/030234207X195158
46. Woolf, Steven. 2008. “The Meaning of Translational Research and Why It Matters.” The Journal of the American Medical Association 299 (2): 211–213. doi: 10.1001/jama.2007.26
47. World Medical Association. 2013. Declaration of Helsinki. Accessed October 25. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/.