Variation and Acquisition of Complex Techniques: Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 586-592

  Davidson, Stuart J ^a   Rojnica, Marko ^a   Matthews, Jeffrey B ^a   Langerman, Alexander J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

pancreaticoduodenectomy; surgical education; variation

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MODEL; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SURGEON; SURGERY; SURGICAL TRAINING; TEACHER; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANASTOMOSIS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STAFF; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84994669334     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: 15533514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1553350616663322     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Franzese CB, Stringer SP,. The evolution of surgical training: perspectives on educational models from the past to the future. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007; 40: 1227-1235.
2. Evans DB, Lee JE, Tamm EP, Pisters PWT,. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple operation) and total pancreatectomy for cancer. In: Fischer J, ed. Mastery of Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007: 1299-1314.
3. Neil JA,. Surgery of the liver, biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen. In: Rothrock JC, ed. Alexander's Care of the Patient in Surgery. 14th ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2011: 384-385.
4. Norton JA, Angst MS,. Pancreatic surgery: Whipple resection. In: Jaffe RA, Schmiesing CA, Golianu B, eds. Anesthesiologist's Manual of Surgical Procedures. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2014: 632-638.
5. Wolf AM, Lavu H,. Pancreaticoduodenectomy and its variants. Cancer J. 2012; 18: 555-561.
6. Jafferji MS, Hyman N,. Surgeon not disease severity, often determines the operation for acute complicated diverticulitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 1156-1161.
7. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O'Reilly A, et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 1434-1442.
8. Wennberg JE, Gittelsohn A,. Small area variations: a population-based health information system can guide planning and regulatory decision-making. Science. 1973; 182: 1102-1108.
9. Wennberg JE, Bunker JP, Barnes B,. The need for assessing the outcomes of common medical practices. Annu Rev Public Health. 1980; 1: 277-295.
10. Birkmeyer JD, Reames BN, McCulloch P, Carr AJ, Campbell WB, Wennberg JE,. Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery. Lancet. 2013; 382: 1121-1129.
11. Bianco FJ, Riedel ER, Begg CB, et al. Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters. J Urol. 2005; 173: 2099-2103.
12. Bianco FJ, Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, et al. Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010; 183: 977-983.
13. Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB, et al. Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 777-782.
14. McCulloch P, Nagendran M, Campbell WB, et al. Strategies to reduce variation in the use of surgery. Lancet. 2013; 382: 1130-1139.
15. Bosk C,. Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2003.
16. Reames BN, Shubeck SP, Birkmeyer JD,. Strategies for reducing regional variation in the use of surgery. Ann Surg. 2014; 259: 616-627.
17. Stepaniak PS, Heij C, Buise MP,. Bariatric surgery with operating room teams that stayed fixed during the day: a multicenter study analyzing the effects on patient outcomes, teamwork and safety climate, and procedure duration. Anesth Analg. 2012; 115: 1384-1392.
18. Xu R, Carty MJ, Orgill DP, et al. The teaming curve. Ann Surg. 2013; 258: 953-957.
19. Doherty C, Nakoneshny SC, Harrop AR, et al. A standardized operative team for major head and neck cancer ablation and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 82-88.
20. Farrokhi FR, Gunther M, Williams B, Blackmore CC,. Application of lean methodology for improved quality and efficiency in operating room instrument availability. J Healthc Qual. 2015; 37: 277-286.
21. Lunardini D, Arington R, Canacari EG, et al. Lean principles to optimize instrument utilization for spine surgery in an academic medical center: an opportunity to standardize, cut costs, and build a culture of improvement. Spine. 2014; 39: 1714-1717.
22. Rosenblatt WH, Chavez A, Tenney D, Silverman DG,. Assessment of the economic impact of an overage reduction program in the operating room. J Clin Anesth. 1997; 9: 478-481.
23. Chalian AA, Kagan SH, Goldberg AN, et al. Design and impact of intraoperative pathways for head and neck resection and reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; 128: 892-896.
24. Casaletto JA, Rajaratnam V,. Surgical process re-engineering: carpal tunnel decompression: a model. Hand Surg. 2004; 9: 19-27.
25. Lee BT, Tobias AM, Yueh JH, et al. Design and impact of an intraoperative pathway: a new operating room model for team-based practice. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 865-873.
26. Fong AJ, Smith M, Langerman AJ,. Efficiency improvement in the operating room. J Surg Res. 2016; 204: 371-383.