The relative importance of visual and sound design in the rehabilitation of a bridge connecting a highly populated area and a park

Proceedings of the INTER-NOISE 2016 - 45th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering: Towards a Quieter Future

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 4802-4808

  Echevarria Sanchez, Gemma Maria ^a   Van Renterghem, Timothy ^a   Sun, Kang ^a   De Coensel, Bert ^a   Botteldooren, Dick ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Architecture; Audio visual interactions; Noise control; Road traffic noise; Urban geometry; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC VARIABLES CONTROL; ARCHITECTURE; AUDIO ACOUSTICS; AUDITION; BRIDGES; FINITE DIFFERENCE TIME DOMAIN METHOD; NOISE ABATEMENT; NOISE POLLUTION; SOUND REPRODUCTION; SURVEYS; URBAN PLANNING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

AUDIO-VISUAL INTERACTIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; FREQUENCY DEPENDENT; NOISE PERCEPTION; ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE; URBAN ENVIRONMENTS; URBAN GEOMETRY; VIRTUAL-REALITY ENVIRONMENT;

ACOUSTIC NOISE;

EID: 84994632226     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ouis D. Annoyance from road traffic noise: a review. J Environ Psychol. 2001;21(1):101-20.
2. Botteldooren D, Dekoninck L, Gillis D. The influence of traffic noise on appreciation of the living quality of a neighborhood. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(3):777-98.
3. Echevarria Sanchez GM, Van Renterghem T, Botteldooren D. The effect of street canyon design on traffic noise exposure along roads. Build Environ. 2015;97:96-110.
4. Hong JY, Jeon JY. The effects of audio-visual factors on perceptions of environmental noise barrier performance. Landsc Urban Plan. Elsevier B.V.; 2014;125:28-37.
5. Liu J, Kang J, Behm H, Luo T. Effects of landscape on soundscape perception: Soundwalks in city parks. Landsc Urban Plan. Elsevier B.V.; 2014;123:30-40.
6. Viollon S, Lavandier C, Drake C. Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment. Appl Acoust. 2002;63(5):493-511.
7. Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8(4):162-9.
8. Hunter MD, Eickhoff SB, Pheasant RJ, Douglas MJ, Watts GR, Farrow TFD, et al. The state of tranquility: subjective perception is shaped by contextual modulation of auditory connectivity. Neuroimage. 2010;53(2):611-8.
9. Hong JY, Jeon JY. Influence of urban contexts on soundscape perceptions: A structural equation modeling approach. Landsc Urban Plan. 2015;141:78-87.
10. Aylor DE. Some Physical and Psychological Aspects of Noise Attenuation by Vegetation. Metrop Phys Environ. 1977;229-33.
11. Watts G, Chinn L, Godfrey N. The effects of vegetation on the perception of traffic noise. Appl Acoust. 1999;56:39-56.
12. Van Renterghem T, Botteldooren D. View on outdoor vegetation reduces noise annoyance for dwellers near busy roads. Landsc Urban Plan. Elsevier B.V.; 2016;148:203-15.
13. Lamy D, Mudrik L, Deouell LY. Unconscious auditory information can prime visual word processing: A process-dissociation procedure study. Conscious Cogn. 2008;17(3):688-98.
14. Ruotolo F, Maffei L, Di Gabriele M, Iachini T, Masullo M, Ruggiero G, et al. Immersive virtual reality and environmental noise assessment: An innovative audio-visual approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev. Elsevier Inc.; 2013;41:10-20.
15. Maffei L, Iachini T, Masullo M, Aletta F, Sorrentino F, Senese VP, et al. The effects of vision-related aspects on noise perception of wind turbines in quiet areas. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(5):1681-97.
16. Bishop I, Rohrmann B. Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: a comparison. Landsc Urban Plan. 2003;65(4):261-77.