Extension of the step standard for parametric cad models

Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 269-275

  Pratt, Michael J ^a  

^a LMR Systems   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994623700     PISSN: 15309827     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.1419196     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Pratt, M. J., 2001a, “Introduction to ISO 10303-the STEP Standard for Product Data Exchange,” ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 1, No. 1, pp. 102-103.
2. Pratt, M. J., 2001b, “Practical Aspects of using the STEP Standard,” ASME J. Comput, Inf. Sci. Eng., 1, No. 2, pp. 197-199.
3. ISO, 1994a, ISO 10303:1994, “Industrial Automation Systems and Integration-Product Data Representation and Exchange,” Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
4. Shah, J. J., andMantyla, M., 1995, Parametric and Feature-based CAD/CAM, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. ISO, 1998a, ISO 13584:1998, “Industrial Automation Systems and Integration-Parts Library,” Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
6. ISO, 1998b, ISO 13584-20:1998, “Industrial Automation Systems and Integration-Parts Library-Part 20: General Resources: Logical Model of Expressions,” Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
7. Pratt, M. J., and Anderson, W. D., 2001, “A Shape Modeling Applications Programming Interface for the STEP Standard,” Computer-Aided Design, 33, No. 7, pp. 531-543.
8. PDES Inc., 2001, http://pdesinc.aticorp.org
9. PDES Inc., 1997, “ENGEN Data Model Version 4.6,” SCRA, Charleston, SC.
10. Anderson, W. D., and Ansaldi S., 1998, “ENGEN Data Model: A Neutral Model to Capture Design Intent,” in G. Jacucci, G. J. Olling, K. Preiss and M. J. Wozny (eds.), CDROM Procs. of IFIP PROLAMAT’98 conference, Trento, Italy, Sept. 1998; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. ISO, 2001, ISO CD 10303-108, “Industrial Automation Systems and Integration-Product Data Representation and Exchange-Part 108: Integrated Application Resource: Parameterization and Constraints for Explicit Geometric Product Models” (available on the WorldWide Web at http://www.nist.gov/sc4/wg-qc/wg12/n940).
12. ISO, 1994b, ISO 10303-11:1994, “Industrial Automation Systems and Integration-Product Data Representation and Exchange-Part 11: Description Methods: The EXPRESS Language Reference Manual,” Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
13. USPro, 1996, USPRO/IPO-100-1996, “Computer Aided Processing of Engineering Drawings and Related Documentation (IGES Version 5.3),” Charleston, SC: US Product Data Association (US National Standard).
14. Bettig, B., and Shah, J. J., 2000, “Derivation of a Standard Set of Geometric Constraints for Parametric Modeling and Data Exchange,” Computer Aided Design, 33, No. 1, 17-33.
15. ISO, 2000, ISO TC184/SC4/WG12 N527, “JNC Proposal for STEP Assembly Model for Products” (early working draft of ISO 10303-109, available on the World Wide Web at http://www.nist.gov/sc4/wg-qc/wg12/n527). 3 Indeed, it was found in the ENGEN project described earlier that at least one CAD system appears to treat topological relationships as constraints on geometric elements.
16. ISO, 1997, ISO 10303-47:1997, “Industrial Automation Systems and Integration-Product data Representation and Exchange-Part 47: Integrated Generic Resources: Shape Variation Tolerances,” Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
17. ISO, 1999, Technical Specification TS 17450:1999, “Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)-Model for Geometric Specification and Verification,” Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
18. ASME, 1994a, ASME Y14.5M-1994, “Dimensioning and Tolerancing,” New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (US National Standard).
19. ASME, 1994b, ASME Y14.5.1M-1994, “Mathematical Definition of Dimensioning and Tolerancing Principles,” New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (US National Standard).
20. Srinivasan, V, 1999, “A Geometrical Product Specification Language Based on a Classification of Symmetry Groups,” Computer Aided Design, 31, No. 11, pp. 659-668.
21. Capoyleas, V, Chen, X., and Hoffmann, C. M., 1996, “Generic Naming in Generative Constraint-based Design,” Computer Aided Design, 28, No. 1, pp. 17-26.
22. Kripac, J., 1995, “A Mechanism for Persistently Naming Topological Entities in History-based Parametric Solid Models,” in C. M. Hoffmann and J. R. Rossignac (eds.), Proc. 3rd ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications, Salt Lake City, UT, 17-19 May 1995; New York, ACM Press.
23. Raghothama, S., and Shapiro, V, 1998, “Boundary Representation Deformation in Parametric Solid Modeling,” ACM Trans. Computer Graphics, 17, No. 4, pp. 259-286.