Sustainability assessment methodology of urban mobility projects

Land Use Policy

Volumn 60, Issue , 2017, Pages 334-342

  Cavalcanti, Clarissa de Oliveira ^a   Limont, Marcelo ^b   Dziedzic, Maurício ^b   Fernandes, Valdir ^c  

^a Rua General Carneiro 1103/102   (Brazil)

^b POSITIVO UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDADE TECNOLÓGICA FEDERAL DO PARANÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Sustainability indicator; Sustainable development; Urban transportation

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; METROPOLITAN AREA; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN POLICY; URBAN TRANSPORT;

BRAZIL; CURITIBA; PARANA [BRAZIL];

EID: 84994593496     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Agudelo-Vera, C.M., Mels, A.R., Keesman, K.J., Rijnaarts, H.H.M., Resource management as a key factor for sustainable urban planning. J. Environ. Manage. 92:10 (2011), 2295–2303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.016.
2. Assunção, M.A., Sustainable urban mobility indicators for the city of Uberlandia. MG. Federal University of Uberlandia. Uberlandia. Brazil., 2012 (accessed January 2014) http://www.ppgec.feciv.ufu.br/node/329.
3. Barczak, R., Duarte, F., Environmental impacts of urban mobility: five categories of mitigating measures. Urbe −Rev. Bras. Gest. Urbana 4 (2012), 13–32 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2175-33692012000100002.
4. Brazil, Federal Law n°. 10.257. Regulates Articles 182 and 183 of the Federal Constitution, Establishes General Guidelines for Urban Policy and Makes Others Providences. 2001 Brasilia, DF, Brazil. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/leis_2001/l10257.htm (accessed May 2015).
5. Brazil, Federal Law n°. 12.587. Establishing the Guidelines of the National Urban Mobility Policy Brasilia, 2012. 2012 Brasilia, DF, Brazil. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12587.htm (accessed May 2015).
6. Cavalcanti, C., de, O., Limont, M., Dziedzic, M., Ferndandes, V., Sustainability of urban mobility projects in the Curitiba metropolitan region. Land Use Policy, 2016 (under review).
7. Cavalcanti, C.O., Guide to sustainability assessment of urban mobility projects. Positivo University, Curitiba, Brazil., 2015 (accessed May 2015) http://www.up.edu.br/mestrado-e-doutorado/gestao-ambiental/dissertacoes-e-teses.
8. Costa, M.S., An Index of Sustainable Urban Mobility. 2008, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil PhD Thesis, http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18144/tde-01112008-200521/(accessed January 2014).
9. Dalal-Clayton, B., Sadler, B., Strategic Environmental Assessment: a Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. 2005, Earthscan, London.
10. Debnath, A.K., Chin, H.C., Haque, M.M., Yuen, B., A methodological framework for benchmarking smart transport cities. Cities 37 (2014), 47–56 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.11.004.
11. Diesendorf, M., Urban transportation in the 21st century −editorial. Environ. Sci. Policy 3 (2000), 11–13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00009-5.
12. Duguma, L.A., Wambugu, S.W., Minang, P.A., van Noordwijk, M., A systematic analysis of enabling conditions for synergy between climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in developing countries. Environ. Sci. Policy 42 (2014), 138–148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.06.003.
13. Gibson, R.B., In full retreat: the Canadian government's new environmental assessment law undoes decades of progress. Impact Assess. Project Appraisal 30 (2012), 179–188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.720417.
14. Gomide, A.A., Galindo, E.P., Urban mobility: an unfinished agenda or the return of what never was. Estud. Avançados 27:79 (2013), 27–39 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142013000300003.
15. Hammond, A., Adriaanse, A., Rodenburg, E., Bryant, D., Woodward, R., Environmental Indicators: a Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development., 1995, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
16. Haque, M.M., Chin, H.C., Debnath, a. K., Sustainable, safe, smart—three key elements of Singapore's evolving transport policies. Transp. Policy 27 (2013), 20–31 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.017.
17. Hardi, P., Zdan, T.J., Assessing Sustainable Development: Principles in Practice. 1997, Winnipeg, IISD (accessed May 2015) https://www.iisd.org/pdf/bellagio.pdf.
18. Henning, T.F.P., Muruvan, S., Feng, W. a., Dunn, R.C., The development of a benchmarking tool for monitoring progress towards sustainable transportation in New Zealand. Transp. Policy 18 (2011), 480–488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.10.012.
19. Hickman, R., Hall, P., Banister, D., Planning more for sustainable mobility. J. Transp. Geogr. 33 (2013), 210–219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.07.004.
20. Inter-American Development Bank, About the Inter-American Development Bank. 2014, Inter-American Development Bank - BID http://www.iadb.org/en/about-us/about-the-inter-american-development-bank,5995.html (acessed October 2014).
21. John, V.M., Prado, R.T.A., Best Practices for More Sustainable Housing. 2010, Páginas & Letras, São Paulo.
22. Joumard, R., Nicolas, J.P., Transport project assessment methodology within the framework of sustainable development. Ecol. Indic. 10 (2010), 136–142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.04.002.
23. Kauling, M.F., Cavalcanti, C.O., Limont, M., Fernandes, V., A reflection on innovative technologies for sustainable urban mobility. Tecnologia e Sociedade 10:20 (2014), 201–212 (accessed April 2015) https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rts/article/view/2651/1754.
24. Litman, T., Well Measured: Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport Planning. 2013. 2013, Victoria Transport Policy Institute (accessed July 2013) http://www.vtpi.org/wellmeas.pdf.
25. Malheiros, T.F., Coutinho, S.M.V., Phillippi Jr, A., Sustainability indicators: a conceptual approach. Phillippi, A., Malheiros, T.F., (eds.) Sustainability and Environmental Management Indicators, 2012, Manole, Barueri, 31–76.
26. Meadows, D., Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development. 1998, The Sustainability Institute (accessed July 2013) http://www.iisd.org/pdf/s_ind_2.pdf.
27. Miranda, H.D.F., Rodrigues da Silva, A.N., Benchmarking sustainable urban mobility: the case of Curitiba, Brazil. Transp. Policy 21 (2012), 141–151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.03.009.
28. Morais, T.C., Evaluation and Selection of Alternatives for the Promotion of Sustainable Urban Mobility: the Case of Anápolis, Goiás, Brazil. 2012, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos. Brazil Master's thesis, http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18144/tde-07022013-164654/pt-br.php (accessed August 2013).
29. Nascimento, E.P., The trajectory of sustainability: from environmental to social, from social to economic. Estud. Avançados 26:74 (2012), 51–64 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142012000100005.
30. Quiroga, M.R., Indicadores De Sostenibilidad Ambiental Y De Desarrollo Sostenible: Estado Del Arte Y Perspectivas. Serie Manuales 16. 2001 Santiago, Chile (acessed May 2015) http://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/5570-indicadores-de-sostenibilidad-ambiental-y-de-desarrollo-sostenible-estado-del.
31. Quiroga, M.R., Indicadores Ambientales Y De Desarrolo Sostenible: Avances Y Perspectivas Para América Latina Y El Caribe. Serie Manuales 55. 2007 Santiago, Chile (accessed December 2013) http://www.eclac.org/deype/publicaciones/xml/4/34394/LCL2771e.pdf.
32. Quiroga, M.R., Methodological Guide for Developing Environmental and Sustainable Development Indicators in Latin American and Caribbean Countries. Manuals Series 61. 2009 Santiago, Chile (accessed May 2015) http://www.cepal.org/en/node/22043.
33. Rodrigues da Silva, A.N., Costa, M.S., Macedo, M.H., Multiple views of sustainable urban mobility: the case of Brazil. Transp. Policy 15 (2008), 350–360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.003.
34. Sachs, I., Transition Strategies for the Twenty-first Century: Development and Environment. 1993, Nobel Studio/FUNDAP, São Paulo.
35. Sachs, I., Development: Inclusive, Sustainable and Sustained. 2008, Garamond, Rio de Janeiro.
36. Sachs, I., Back to the visible hand: the challenges of the Second Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit Estud. Avançados 26:74 (2012), 5–20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142012000100002.
37. Santos, M., The Brazilian Urbanization. 2nd ed., 1994, Hucitec, São Paulo.
38. Scandar Neto, W.J., Synthesis That Organizes the Look: a Proposal for the Construction and Representation of Sustainable Development Indicators and Their Application for Fluminense Municipalities. 2006, National School of Statistical Sciences, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Master's thesis, http://www.dominiopublico.gov.br/(accessed May 2015).
39. Shields, D., Solar, S., Martin, W., The role of values and objectives in communicating indicators of sustainability. Ecol. Indic. 2:1-2 (2002), 149–160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00042-0.
40. Silveira, M.R., Cocco, R.G., Public transportation, mobility and urban planning: essential contradictions. Estud. Avançados 27:79 (2013), 41–53 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142013000300004.
41. The Equator Principles Association, The Equator Principles: [S.I.]. 2014 (accessed December 2014) http://www.equator-principles.com.
42. Tiwari, G., Jain, D., Accessibility and safety indicators for all road users: case study Delhi BRT. J. Transp. Geogr. 22 (2012), 87–95 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.11.020.
43. Wilheim, J., Urban mobility: a challenge for the people of São Paulo. Estud. Avançados 27:79 (2013), 7–26 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142013000300002.
44. Winograd, M., Farrow, A., Sustainable development indicators for decision making: concepts, methods, definition and use. Seidler, R., (eds.) Dimensions of Sustainable Development, 2009, EOLSS Publishers, Boston.
45. World Bank, World Development Indicators 2014. 2014, World Bank, Washington, DC http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0163-1.