How data analysis can dominate interpretations of dominant general factors

Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 438-445

  Wiernik, Brenton M ^a   Wilmot, Michael P ^a   Kostal, Jack W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994560113     PISSN: 17549426     EISSN: 17549434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/iop.2015.60     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Boker, S.M., Neale, M.C., Maes, H.H., Wilde, M. J., Spiegel, M., Brick, T.R., Team OpenMx. (2015). OpenMx 2.0 user guide (Release No. 2.0.1-4157). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia. Retrieved from http://openmx.psyc.virginia.edu/documentation
2. Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The modeling and assessment of work performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47-74. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427
3. Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J.-P., & Zhang, Z. (2012).Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80, 219-251. http://doi.org/10/d6ht4b
4. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010).What reviewers should expect fromauthors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325-334. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
5. Edwards, B. D., Bell, S. T., Arthur, W., Jr., & Decuir, A. D. (2008). Relationships between facets of job satisfaction and task and contextual performance. Applied Psychology, 57, 441-465. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00328.x
6. Kinicki, A. J., McKee-Ryan, F. M., Schriesheim, C. A., & Carson, K. P. (2002). Assessing the construct validity of the Job Descriptive Index: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 14-32. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.14
7. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99. http://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
8. McAbee, S. T., Oswald, F. L., & Connelly, B. S. (2014). Bifactor models of personality and college student performance: A broad versus narrow view. European Journal of Personality, 28, 604-619. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.1975
9. Ree, M. J., Carretta, T. R., & Teachout, M. S. (2015). Pervasiveness of dominant general factors in organizational measurement. Industrial andOrganizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8(3), 409-427.
10. Reise, S. P. (2012).The rediscovery of bifactormeasurementmodels.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667-696. http://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
11. Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Berges, A. (2013). Conscientiousness, its facets, and the prediction of job performance ratings: Evidence against the narrow measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 74-84. http://doi.org/10/4qw
12. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247