Open Access and Predatory Journals: Two Very Different Entities

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 447-448

  Pearson, Geraldine S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994181882     PISSN: 10783903     EISSN: 15325725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078390316668478     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Beall J., (2016). Predatory journals: Ban predators from the scientific record. Nature, 534, 326. doi:10.1038/534326a
2. Committee on Publication Ethics. (2015). Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. Retrieved from http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines
3. Nicoll L. H, Chinn P. L., (2015). Caught in the trap: the allure of deceptive publishers. Nurse Author & Editor, 25, retrieved on line on 8/15/16 from http://naepub.com/predatory-publishing/2015-25-4-4/
4. Suber P., (2005). Open access overview. Retrieved from http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
5. Tennant J. P., Waldner F., Jacques D. C., Masuzzo P., Collister L. B., Hartgerink C. H. J., (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review. F1000 Research, 5, 632. doi:10.12688/f1000research.8460.2