Development of the LaComm 1.0, A French medical communication analysis software: A study assessing its sensitivity to change

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 297-304

  Gibon, Anne Sophie ^a,b   Durieux, Jean François ^c   Merckaert, Isabelle ^a,b   Delvaux, Nicole ^b,d   Farvacques, Christine ^c   Libert, Yves ^a,b   Marchal, Serge ^c   Moucheux, Angélique ^c   Slachmuylder, Jean Louis ^c   Razavi, Darius ^a,b  

^a JULES BORDET INSTITUTE   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^c CPO (Centre de Psycho Oncologie)   (Belgium)

^d ERASME HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Communication skills training program; Sensitivity to change; Tools

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CERTIFICATION; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL COMMUNICATION ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NURSE; ONCOLOGY NURSE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MANPOWER; NEOPLASM; NURSING EDUCATION; ONCOLOGY; ONCOLOGY NURSING; PATIENT SIMULATION; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; STANDARDS;

COMMUNICATION; EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING; HUMANS; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; NEOPLASMS; NURSES; ONCOLOGY NURSING; PATIENT SIMULATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84994072618     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. [1] Gysels, M., Richardson, A., Higginson, I.J., Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of training methods. Support. Care Cancer 13:6 (2005), 356–366.
2. [2] Merckaert, I., Libert, Y., Razavi, D., Communication skills training in cancer care: where are we and where are we going?. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 17:4 (2005), 319–330.
3. [3] Stiefel, F., Favre, N., Despland, J.N., Communication skills training in oncology: it works!. Recent Results Cancer Res. 168 (2006), 113–119.
4. [4] Merckaert, I., Libert, Y., Razavi, D., Communication Skills Training and Research: The Brussels’ Experience. 2009, International Initiative in Communication Training, 671–680.
5. [5] Moore, P.M., Wilkinson, S.S.M., Rivera Mercado, S., Communication skills training for health care professionals working with cancer patients, their families and/or carers (Review). Cochrane Libr., 1, 2009.
6. [6] Barth, J., Lannen, P., Efficacy of communication skills training courses in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Oncol. 22:5 (2010), 1030–1040.
7. [7] Stiefel, F., et al. Communication skills training in oncology: a position paper based on a consensus meeting among European experts in 2009. Ann. Oncol. 21:2 (2010), 204–207.
8. [8] Uitterhoeve, R.J., et al. The effect of communication skills training on patient outcomes in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J. Cancer Care (Engl.) 19:4 (2010), 442–457.
9. [9] Moore, P.M., et al. Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer (Review). Cochrane Libr.(3), 2013.
10. [10] Ong, L.M., et al. The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) in oncological consultations: psychometric properties. Psychooncology 7:5 (1998), 387–401.
11. [11] Roter, D., Larson, S., The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ. Couns. 46:4 (2002), 243–251.
12. [12] Ford, S., et al. The Medical Interaction Process System (MIPS): an instrument for analysing interviews of oncologists and patients with cancer. Soc. Sci. Med. 50:4 (2000), 553–566.
13. [13] Butow, P.N., et al. Computer-based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation. Br. J. Cancer 71:5 (1995), 1115–1121.
14. [14] Dent, E., et al. The Cancode interaction analysis system in the oncological setting: reliability and validity of video and audio tape coding. Patient Educ. Couns. 56:1 (2005), 35–44.
15. [15] Booth, C., Maguire, P., Development of a Rating System to Assess Interaction Between Cancer Patients and Health Professionals. 1991, Cancer Research Campaign, London.
16. [16] Arora, N.K., Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians’ communication behavior. Soc. Sci. Med. 57:5 (2003), 791–806.
17. [17] Delvaux, N., et al. Effects of a 105 h psychological training program on attitudes, communication skills and occupational stress in oncology: a randomised study. Br. J. Cancer 90:1 (2004), 106–114.
18. [18] Rosser, J.E., Maguire, P., Dilemmas in general practice: the care of the cancer patient. Soc. Sci. Med. 16 (1982), 315–322.
19. [19] Maguire, P., Barriers to psychological care of the dying. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 291:6510 (1985), 1711–1713.
20. [20] Razavi, D., et al. Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study. Br. J. Cancer 87:1 (2002), 1–7.
21. [21] Canivet, D., et al. Improving communication in cancer pain management nursing: a randomized controlled study assessing the efficacy of a communication skills training program. Support. Care Cancer 22:12 (2014), 3311–3320.
22. [22] Libert, Y., et al. Impact of medical specialists’ locus of control on communication skills in oncological interviews. Br. J. Cancer 88:4 (2003), 502–509.
23. [23] Razavi, D., et al. How to optimize physicians’ communication skills in cancer care: results of a randomized study assessing the usefulness of posttraining consolidation workshops. J. Clin. Oncol. 21:16 (2003), 3141–3149.
24. [24] Delvaux, N., et al. Physicians’ communication with a cancer patient and a relative: a randomized study assessing the efficacy of consolidation workshops. Cancer 103:11 (2005), 2397–2411.
25. [25] Merckaert, I., et al. Factors that influence physicians’ detection of distress in patients with cancer. Cancer 104:2 (2005), 411–421.
26. [26] Libert, Y., et al. Does psychological characteristic influence physicians’ communication styles? Impact of physicians’ locus of control on interviews with a cancer patient and a relative. Support. Care Cancer 14:3 (2006), 230–242.
27. [27] Libert, Y., et al. Physicians are different when they learn communication skills: influence of the locus of control. Psycho-Oncol. 16:6 (2007), 553–562.
28. [28] Lienard, A., et al. Factors that influence cancer patients’ and relatives’ anxiety following a three-person medical consultation: impact of a communication skills training program for physicians. Psycho-Oncol. 17:5 (2008), 488–496.
29. [29] Merckaert, I., et al. Impact of life-threatening risk information on the evolution of patients’ anxiety and risk recall: the specific context of informed consent for experimental stem cell transplant. Patient Educ. Couns. 75:2 (2009), 192–198.
30. [30] Hogenraad, R., Daubies, C., Bestgen, Y., Une théorie et une méthode générale d'analyse textuelle assistée par ordinateur: le Système PROTAN (PROTocol ANalyser). 1995, Université Catholique de Louvain, Psychology Department, Louvain-la-Neuve (Unpublished document ed.).
31. [31] Pennebaker, J., Booth, R., Francis, M., Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC–Operator's Manual. 2007, LIWC.net, Austin, TX.
32. [32] Stone, P., et al. The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. 1966, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
33. [33] Cohen-Cole, S., The Medical Interview: The Three-Function Approach. 1991, Mobsby Year Book, St. Louis.
34. [34] Mead, N., Bower, P., Measuring patient-centredness: a comparison of three observation-based instruments. Patient Educ. Couns. 39:1 (2000), 71–80.