Local is not always better: the impact of climate information on values, behavior and policy support

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 724-732

  Schoenefeld, Jonas J ^a   McCauley, Michelle R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Climate policy; Local global climate information; Policy support; Pro environmental behavior; Values

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; INFORMATION SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; RESIDENT POPULATION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84994060567     PISSN: 21906483     EISSN: 21906491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13412-015-0288-y     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ajzen I, Joyce N, Sheikh S, Cote NG (2011) Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: the role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 33:101–117
2. APA (2010) Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf. Accessed 25 March 2015
3. Axelrod LJ, Lehman DR (1993) Responding to environmental concerns: what factors guide individual action? J Environ Psychol 13:149–159
4. Baldassare M, Katz C (1992) The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices. Environ Behav 24:602–616
5. Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 27:14–25
6. Bolderdijk JW, Gorsira M, Keizer K, Steg L (2013) Values determine the (in)effectiveness of informational interventions in promoting pro-environmental behavior. PLoS One 8, e83911
7. Boninger DS, Krosnick JA, Berent MK (1995) Origins of attitude importance: self-interest, social identification, and value relevance. J Pers Soc Psychol 68:61–80
8. Bostrom A, Böhm G, O’Connor RE (2013) Targeting and tailoring climate change communications. WIREs Clim Chang 4:447–455. doi:10.1002/wcc.234
9. Brody SD, Zahran S, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ Behav 40:72–95
10. Corner A, Markowitz E, Pidgeon N (2014) Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. WIRES Clim Change 5:411–422
11. de Groot JIM, Steg L (2008) Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environ Behav 40:330–354
12. Dunlap RE, Scarce R (1991) Poll trends: environmental problems and protection. Publ Opin Q 55:651–672
13. Eaton AA, Visser PS (2008) Attitude importance: understanding the causes and consequences of passionately held views. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2:1719–1736
14. Eaton AA, Majka EA, Visser PS (2008) Emerging perspectives on the structure and function of attitude strength. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 19:165–201
15. European Commission (2014) Special Eurobarometer 409: climate change http://ec.europa.eu/clima/citizens/support/docs/report_2014_en.pdf. Accessed 24 March 2015
16. Evans L, Maio GR, Corner A, Hodgetts CJ, Ahmed S, Hahn U (2012) Self-interest and pro-environmental behaviour. Nat Clim Chang 3:122–125
17. Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychol Sci 24:56–62
18. Gagnon Thompson SC, Barton MA (1994) Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. J Environ Psychol 14:149–157
19. Holbrook AL, Berent MK, Krosnick JA, Visser PS, Boninger DS (2005) Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory. J Pers Soc Psychol 88:749–769
20. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
21. Kaiser FG, Schultz PW (2009) The attitude-behavior relationship: a test of three models of the moderating role of behavioral difficulty. J Appl Soc Psychol 39:186–207
22. Kaiser FG, Wilson M (2000) Assessing people’s general ecological behavior: a cross‐cultural measure. J Appl Soc Psychol 30:952–978
23. Kaiser FG, Wölfing S, Fuhrer U (1999) Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. J Environ Psychol 19:1–19
24. Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (2009) Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
25. Karp DG (1996) Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environ Behav 28:111–133
26. Krosnick JA, Petty RE (1995) Attitude strength: an overview. In: Petty RE, Krosnick JA (eds) Attitude strength. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 1–24
27. Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Chang 77:45–72
28. Leiserowitz A (2007) Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. In: Moser SC, Dilling L (eds) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 44–63
29. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N (2011) Global warming’s six Americas, May 2011. Yale University and George Mason University
30. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Rosenthal S (2014) Climate change in the American mind: April, 2014. Yale University and George Mason University. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, New Haven
31. Lizza R (2010) As the world burns: how the Senate and the White House missed their last chance to deal with climate change. The New Yorker 86:70–77
32. Manzo LC, Weinstein ND (1987) Behavioral commitment to environmental protection. Environ Behav 19:673–694
33. Moser SC (2010) Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1:31–53
34. Nilsson A, Biel A (2007) Assessing values in environmental policy formation. In: Lundqvist LJ, Biel A (eds) From Kyoto to the town hall: making international and national climate policy work at the local level. Earthscan, London, pp 59–76
35. Nilsson A, Biel A (2008) Acceptance of climate change policy measures: role framing and value guidance. Eur Environ 18:203–215
36. Nilsson A, von Borgstede C, Biel A (2004) Willingness to accept policy measures: the effects of values and norms. J Environ Psychol 24:267–277
37. Nordlund AM, Garvill J (2002) Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environ Behav 34:740–756
38. Nordlund AM, Garvill J (2003) Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. J Environ Psychol 23:339–347
39. O'Brien KL, Wolf J (2010) A values‐based approach to vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1:232–242
40. Poortinga W, Steg L, Vlek C (2004) Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: a study into household energy use. Environ Behav 36:70–93
41. Rokeach M (1973) The nature of human values. Free Press, New York
42. Scannell L, Gifford R (2013) Personally relevant climate change: the role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environ Behav 45:60–85
43. Schiermeier Q (2003) Climate panel to seize political hot potatoes. Nature 421:879
44. Schoenefeld JJ, Hofer BK (2010) Undergraduate knowledge and acceptance of human-induced climate change (conference poster). Tucson, International Interdisciplinary Conference on the Environment
45. Schultz PW, Zelezny L (1999) Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: evidence for consistency across 14 countries. J Environ Psychol 19:255–265
46. Schultz P, Gouveia VV, Cameron LD, Tankha G, Schmuck P, Franěk M (2005) Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. J Cross Cult Psychol 36:457–475
47. Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25:1–65
48. Schwartz SH (1994) Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J Soc Issues 50:19–45
49. Schwartz SH, Melech G, Lehmann A, Burgess S, Harris M, Owens V (2001) Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. J Cross Cult Psychol 32:519–542
50. Sheldon KM, Nichols CP, Kasser T (2011) Americans recommend smaller ecological footprints when reminded of intrinsic American values of self-expression, family, and generosity. Ecopsychology 3:97–104
51. Shwom R, Dan A, Dietz T (2008) The effects of information and state of residence on climate change policy preferences. Clim Chang 90:343–358
52. Sinatra GM, Kardash CM, Taasoobshirazi G, Lombardi D (2012) Promoting attitude change and expressed willingness to take action toward climate change in college students. Instr Sci 40:1–17
53. Slimak MW, Dietz T (2006) Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Anal 26:1689–1705
54. Spence A, Pidgeon N (2010) Framing and communicating climate change: the effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Glob Environ Chang 20:656–667
55. Steg L, de Groot JIM (2012) Environmental values. In: Clayton SD (ed) The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology. Oxford University Press, New York
56. Steg L, de Groot JIM, Dreijerink L, Abrahamse W, Siero F (2011) General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: the role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern. Soc Nat Resour 24:349–367
57. Stern PC, Kalof L, Dietz T, Guagnano GA (1995) Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. J Appl Soc Psychol 25:1611–1636
58. Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev 6:81–97
59. Thapa B (1999) Environmentalism: the relation of environmental attitudes and environmentally responsible behaviors among undergraduate students. Bull Sci Technol Soc 19:426–438
60. Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev 117:440–463
61. Visser PS, Krosnick JA, Simmons JP (2003) Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: a new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis. J Exp Soc Psychol 39:118–141
62. Whitmarsh L, Seyfang G, O’Neill S (2011) Public engagement with carbon and climate change: to what extent is the public ‘carbon capable’? Glob Environ Chang 21:56–65
63. Zahran S, Brody SD, Grover H, Vedlitz A (2006) Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Soc Nat Resour 19:771–789
64. Zahran S, Brody SD, Vedlitz A, Grover H, Miller C (2008) Vulnerability and capacity: explaining local commitment to climate-change policy. Environ Plan C Gov Pol 26:544–562