Toward a Phenomenological Understanding of Visual Communication

Journal of Visual Literacy

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-18

  Barbatsis, Gretchen ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993833777     PISSN: 1051144X     EISSN: 23796529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23796529.2002.11674578     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson, J. (1998). Qualitative approaches to the study of media: Theory and methods of hermeneutic empiricism. In J. Asamen and G. Berry (Eds.) Research paradigms, television, and social behavior (p. 205–236). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Barbatsis, G. (1999). Seeing stories: Representational communication in pictorial terms. Unpublished manuscript. Michigan State University.
3. Barbatsis, G. (1996). “Look and I will show you something you will want to see”: Viewer engagement with negative campaign commercials. Journal of Argumentation and Advocacy, 32, 69–80.
4. Barter, D. & B. (1989). The evolution of encoding research. Journal of Film and Video, 41, 3–14.
5. Barry, A. (1997), Visual intelligence. Albany, NY State University of New York Press.
6. Blumler, J. & Spicer, C. (1990). Prospects for creativity in the new television marketplace: Evidence from program makers. Journal of Communication, 40, 78–101.
7. Giddens, A. (1987). Structuralism, post-structuralism and the production of culture. In A. Giddens and J. Turner (Eds.). Social theory today (pp.195223). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
8. Glick, J. (1987), Chaos: Making a new science. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
9. Graber, D, (1990). Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news. Journal of Communication, 40, 134–155.
10. Granzberg, G. (1982). Television as storyteller: The Algonkian Indians of central Canada. Journal of Communication, 32, 43–52.
11. Griffin, M. (1991). Defining visual communication for a multi-media world. Journalism Educator,46, 9–15.
12. Hall, E. (1982). The hidden dimension. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
13. Hobson, D. (1980). Housewives and the mass media. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.) Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972–1979 (pp. 105 – 116). London: Hutchinson.
14. Ihde, D. (1982). The experience of media. In J. Pilotta (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Essays in phenomenology and hermeneutics (pp, 6980). Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America.
15. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
16. Ivins, W, (1953). Prints and visual communication. New York, NY: DaCapo Press.
17. Jensen, K. (1993). The past in the future: Problems and potentials of historical reception studies. Journal of Communication, 13, 20–27.
18. Knapp, M. (1978). Nonverbal communication!n human interaction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
19. Kosko, B. (1993). Fuzzy thinking. New York, NY: Hyperion.
20. Liebes, T. & Katz, E. (1990). The export of meaning: Cross-cultural readings of Dallas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21. Lindlof, T. (1991). The qualitative study of media audiences. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35, 23–42.
22. Livingstone, S. (1993). The rise and fall of audience research: An old story with a new ending. Journal of Communication, 43, 5–12.
23. Lull, J. (1982). How families select television programs: A mass observational study. Journal of Broadcasting, 26, 801–811.
24. McCrone, J. (1994). Quantum states of mind. New Scientist (20August), 3537.
25. Mitchell, D. (1994). Distinctions between every day and representational communication. Communication Theory, 4, 111–131.
26. Moriarty, S. (1996). Abduction: A theory of visual interpretation. Communication Theory, 6, 167–187.
27. Morley, D. (1993). Active audience theory: Pendulums and pitfalls. Journal of Communication, 43, 13–19.
28. Pacanowsky, M. and Anderson, J. (1982), Cop talk and media use. Journal of Broadcasting, 26, 741–755.
29. Reid, L. and Frazer, C. (1980). Television at play. Journal of Communication, 30, 66–73.
30. Scannell, P. (1995). For a phenomenology of radio and television. Journal of Communication, 45 4–19.
31. Schwartz, D. and Griffin, M. (1987). Amateur photography: The organizational maintenance of an aesthetic code. In T. Lindlof (Ed.) Natural audiences: Qualitative researchof media ses and effects (pp. 198–224). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
32. Stafford, B. (1996). Good looking: Essays on the virtue of images. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
33. Stephens, M. ([998). The rise of the image the fall of the word. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34. Traudt, P., Anderson, J" and Meyer, T. (1987). Phenomenology, empiricism and media experience. Critical Studies in MassCommunication, 4,302–310.
35. Traudt, P. and Lont, C. (1987). Media-logic-in-use: Family as locus of study. In T. Lindlof (Ed.), Natural audiences: Qualitative research of media uses and effects (pp. 139–160). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
36. Turkle, S. and Papert, S. (1993). Epistemological pluralism and the evaluation of the concrete. In I. Hare! and S. Papert (Eds.) Constructivism (pp. 161192). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
37. Wolf, M. (1987). How children negotiate television. InT. Lindlof (Ed.) Natural audiences: Qualitative research of media uses and effects (pp.58–94). Norwood,NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
38. Wolf, M., Meyer, T. and White, C. (1982). Arules-based study of television’s role in the construction of social reality. Joumalof Broadcasting, 26, 813–829.
39. ZettI, H. (1999). Sight, sound, motion:Applied media aesthetics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworfh.