The Difficulty of Mixed-Method Approaches

Sociological Methodology

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 79-81

  Franzosi, Roberto ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993819996     PISSN: 00811750     EISSN: 14679531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0081175012460850     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Clogg C. C. 1978. “Adjustment of Rates Using Multiplicative Models.” Demography 15:523–39.
2. Clogg C. C. 1982. “Some Models for the Analysis of Association in Multi-way Cross-classification Having Ordered Categories.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 77:803–15.
3. Clogg C. C. Eliason S. R. 1987. “Some Common Problems in Loglinear Analysis.” Sociological Methods & Research 16:8–44.
4. Clogg C. Eliason S. R. 1988. “A Flexible Procedure for Adjusting Rates and Proportions, Including Statistical Methods for Group Comparisons.” American Sociological Review 53:262–83.
5. Clogg C. C. Shihadeh E. S. 1994. Statistical Models for Ordinal Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Clogg C.C. Shockey J.W. Eliason S.R. 1990. “A General Framework for Adjustment of Rates.” Sociological Methods and Research 19:156–95.
7. Duncan O. D. 1985a. “New Light on the 16-fold Table.” American Journal of Sociology 91:88–128.
8. Duncan O. D. 1985b. “Some Models for Response Uncertainty for Panel Analysis.” Social Science Research 14:126–41.
9. Gail M. H. Weiand W. Piantadosi S. 1984. “Biased Estimates of Treatment Effect in Randomized Experiments with Nonlinear Regressions and Omitted Covariates.” Biometrika 71:431–44.
10. Goodman L. A. 1979. “Simple Models for the Analysis of Association in Cross-classifications Having Ordered Categories.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:537–52.
11. Goodman L. A. 1986. “Some Useful Extensions for the Usual Corresponding Analysis Approach and the Usual Loglinear Approach in the Analysis of Contingency Tables.” International Statistical Review 54:243–70.
12. Heckman J. J. Ichimura H. Smith J. Todd P. 1998. “Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data.” Econometrica 66:1017–98.
13. Little R. J. A. Pullum T. W. 1979. “The General Linear Model and the Direct Standardization: A Comparison.” Sociological Methods and Research 7:475–501.
14. McCullagh P. Nelder J. A. Generalized Linear Models. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman & Hill.
15. Morgan S. L. Winship C. 2007. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Robins J. M. Hernán A. M. Brumback B. 2000. “Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology.” Epidemiology 11:550–60.
17. Rosenbaum P. R. Rubin D. B. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70:41–55.
18. Rosenbaum P. R. Rubin D. B. 1984. “Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Sub-classification on the Propensity Scores.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 79:516–24.
19. Rubin D. B. 1985. “The Use of Propensity Scores in Applied Bayesian Inference.” Pp. 463–72 in Bayesian Statistics, Vol. 2, edited by Ed. Bernardo J. M. de Groot M. H. Lindley D. V. Smith A. F. M. North-Holland, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
20. Santi L. L. 1989. “Partialling and Purging: Equivalence between Log-linear Analysis and the Purging Method of Rate Adjustment.” Sociological Method and Research 17:376–97.
21. Skinner C. J. Vallet L. A. 2010. “Fitting Log-linear Models to Contingency Tables from Surveys with Complex Sampling Designs: An Investigation of the Clogg-Eliason Approach.” Sociological Methods & Research 39:83–108.
22. Vermunt J. K. 1997a. “LEM: A General Program for the Analysis of Categorical Data.” Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University.
23. Vermunt J. K. 1997b. Loglinear Event History Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Xie Y. 1989. “An Alternative Purging Methods: Controlling the Composition-dependent Interaction in the Analysis of Rates.” Demography 26:711–16.
25. Yamaguchi K. 1994. “Some Loglinear Fixed Effects Latent-trait Markov-Chain Models: A Dynamic Analysis of Personal Efficacy under the Influence of Divorce/Widowhood.” Sociological Methodology. Pp. 39–78 in Vol. 26, edited by Ed. Raftery Adrian E. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
26. Yamaguchi K. 2009. “A Generalized Linear Approach to the Standardization of Rates and Proportions.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 2009, San Francisco, CA.
27. Yamaguchi K. 2011. “Decomposition of Inequality among Groups by Counterfactual Modeling: An Analysis of the Gender Wage Gap in Japan.” Sociological Methodology. Pp. 228–55 in Vol. 26, edited by Ed. Liao Tim Futing. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.