A Focus-Based Study of English Demonstrative Reference: With Special Reference to the Genre of Written Advertisements

Journal of English Linguistics

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 124-148

  oh, Sun Young ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993815540     PISSN: 00754242     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00754240122005260     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Amundson, Marlys M. 1996. Innovative Uses of Language in Print Advertisements: They're Not Just for Breakfast Anymore. Master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
2. Boogaart, Unit den P. C. 1975. Woordfrequenties in Geschreven en Gesproken Nederlands(Werkgroep Frequentie-Onderzoek van het Nederlands). Oosthoek: Utrecht.
3. de Beaugrande, Robert-Alain, and Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. Longman: New York.
4. García, Erica C. 1975. The Role of Theory in Linguistic Analysis: The Spanish Pronoun System. Amsterdam: North Holland.
5. Geis, Michael L. 1982. The Language of Television Advertising. New York: Academic Press.
6. Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, and Jorg D. Jescheniak. 1995. Cataphoric Device in Spoken Discourse. Cognitive Psychology 29: 24-58.
7. Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, and Suzanne Shroyer. 1989. The Cataphoric Use of the Indefinite Thisin Spoken Narratives. Memory & Cognition 17: 536-540.
8. Givón, Talmy. 1992. The Grammar of Referential Coherence as Mental Processing Instructions. Linguistics 30: 5-55.
9. Greenbaum, Sidney, and Randolph Quirk. 1990. A Student's Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
10. Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
11. Halliday, Michael A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
12. Huddleston, Rodney D. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Jespersen, Otto. 1939. Essentials of English Grammar. New York: Holt.
14. Kaplan, Jefferey P. 1989. English Grammar: Principles and Facts. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Kaplan, Jefferey P. 1995. English Grammar: Principles and Facts. 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Kirsner, Robert S. 1979. Deixis in Discourse: AnExploratory Quantitative Study of the Modern Dutch Demonstrative Adjectives. In Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, edited by Talmy Givon, 355-375. NewYork: Academic Press.
17. Kirsner, Robert S. 1993. From Meaning to Message in Two Theories: Cognitive and Saussurean Views of the Modern Dutch Demonstratives. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language: A Collection of Papers from the Duisburg Symposium on Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Richard A. Geiger and Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, 81-114. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
18. Lakoff, Robin. 1974. Remarks on Thisand That. Papers from the Regional Meetings of Chicago Linguistics Society 10: 345-356.
19. Lakoff, Robin. 1981. Persuasive Discourse and Ordinary Conversation, with Examples from Advertising. In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1981), edited by Deborah Tannen, 25-42. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
20. Leech, Geoffrey N. 1966. English in Advertising. London: Longman.
21. Leech, Geoffery N., and J. Svartvik. 1975. A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman.
22. Linde, Charolotte. 1979. Focus of Attention and the Choice of Pronouns in Discourse. In Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, edited by Talmy Givón, 337-354. New York: Academic Press.
23. Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Vol. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Maclaran, Rose. 1982. The Semantics and Pragmatics of the English Demonstratives. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
25. Nishimura, Chiharu. 1996. Demonstratives in Academic Written English Discourse. Master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
26. Pandya, Indubala H. 1977. English Language in Advertising: A Linguistic Study of Indian Press Advertising. Delhi, India: Ajanta.
27. Pandya, Indubala H. 1983. Cataphoric Cohesion and Other Distinctive Features of Indian Advertising English. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 6: 41-52.
28. Passonneau, Rebecca J. 1989. Getting at Discourse Referents. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, June, Vancouver.
29. Quirk, Randolph, and Sidney Greenbaum. 1973. A Concise Grammar of Contemporary English. New York: Harcourt Brace.
30. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey N. Leech, and Jan Lars Svartvik. 1985. AComprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
31. Ramsey, Samuel. 1968. The English Language and English Grammar: An Historical Study. New York: Haskell House.
32. Sidner, Candace L. 1983. Focusing in the Comprehension of Definite Anaphora. In Computational Models of Discourse, edited by Michael Brady and Robert C. Berwick, 267-330. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Strauss, Susan. 1993a. A Discourse Analysis of ‘This,'‘That,’ and ‘It’ and Their Plural Forms in Spontaneous Spoken English. Master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
34. Strauss, Susan. 1993b. Why ‘This’ and ‘That’ Are Not Complete without ‘It.’ In CLS 29: Papers From the 29th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, edited by K. Beals, G. Cooke, D. Kathman, K. E. McCullouoh, S. Kita, and D. Testen, 403-417. Chicago: The Society.
35. Toolan, Machel. 1988. The Language of Press Advertising. In Registers of Written English: Situational Factors and Linguistic Features, edited by Mohsen Ghadessy, 52-64. London: Pinter.
36. Vestergaard, Torben, and Kim Schroder. 1985. The Language of Advertising. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.