Power, Social Transformation, and the New Determinism: A Comment on Grint and Woolgar

Science, Technology & Human Values

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 347-353

  Gill, Rosalind ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993815493     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016224399602100306     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Butler, J. 1992. Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of postmodernism. In Feminists theorise the political, edited by J. Butler and J.W. Scott, 3-21. London : Routledge.
2. Flax, J. 1992. The end of innocence. In Feminists theorise the political, edited by J. Butler and J.W. Scott, 445-63 London: Routledge.
3. Fraser, N., and L. Nicholson. 1988. Social criticism without philosophy. An encounter between feminist and postmodernism. In Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism, edited by A. Ross, 83-104. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
4. Gnnt, K., and S. Woolgar. 1995a. On some failures of nerve in constructivist and feminist analyses of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values 20:286-310.
5. – 1995b. On some failures of nerve in constructivist and feminist analyses of technology In The gender-technology relation: Contemporary theory and research, edited by K. Grint and R. Gill, 48-76. London: Taylor & Francis.
6. Soper, K. 1991 Postmodernism, subjectivity and the question of value. New Left Review 186:120-28.
7. Squires, J., ed. 1993. Principled positions Postmodernism and the rediscovery of value London : Lawrence & Wishart.