Vocative address forms and ideological legitimization in political debates

Discourse Studies

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 35-53

  Jaworski, Adam ^a   Galasiåski, Dariusz ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

address forms; ideology; markedness theory; Polish; TV debates

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993812382     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461445600002001002     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bates, A. and Benigni, L. (1975) ‘Rules of Address in Italy: A Sociological Survey’, Language in Society 3: 271-288.
2. Benoit, W.L. and Wells, W.T. (1996) Candidates in Conflict. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
3. Billig, M. (1990) ‘Stacking the Cards of Ideology: The History of the Sun Royal Album’, Discourse & Society 1: 17-37.
4. Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D. and Radley, A.R. (1988) Ideological Dilemmas. London: Sage.
5. Bober, A. (1988) ‘Trening z Walesa’ [Coaching Walesa], Polityka 50: 10 (10 December).
6. Bogutyn, J. (1988) ‘Miodowicz - Walesa. Przed debata’ [Miodowicz - Walesa: Before the Debate]. Polityka 51: 5 (17 December).
7. Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity.
8. Brown, R. and Ford, M. (1964) ‘Address in American English’, in D. Hymes (ed.) Language in Culture and Society, pp. 234-244. New York: Harper & Row.
9. Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1972) ‘The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity’, in P.P. Giglioli (ed.) Language and Social Context, pp. 256-282. Harmondsworth: Penguin [first published in T.A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language, pp. 253-277. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]
10. Chilton, P. and Schaeffner, C. (1997) ‘Discourse and Politics’, in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 206-230. London: Sage.
11. Dudek, A. (1997) Pierwsze lata III Rzeczypospolitej [First years of the 3rd Republic]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo GEO.
12. Fang, H. and Heng, J.H. (1983) ‘Social Changes and Changing Address Norms in China’, Language in Society 12: 495-507.
13. Fowler, R. (1985) ‘Power’, in T. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol 4, pp. 61-82. London: Academic Press.
14. Friedrich, P. (1966) ‘Structural Implication of Russian Pronominal Usage’, in W. Bright (ed.) Sociolinguistics, pp. 214-259. Mouton: The Hague.
15. Galasinski, D. (1998) ‘Strategies of Talking to Each Other: Rule Breaking in Polish Presidential Debates’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 17: 165-182.
16. Footing
17. Goodwin, M.C. (1990) He-Said-She-Said: Conversational Practices in Urban Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
18. Greatbatch, D. (1992) ‘On the Management of Disagreement between News Interviewees’, in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 268-301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Greatbatch, D. (1998) ‘Conversation Analysis: Neutralism in British News Interviews’, in A. Bell and P. Garrett (eds) Approaches to Media Discourse, pp. 163-185. Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Hall, S. (1996) ‘The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees' in D. Morley and K.H. Chen (eds) Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, pp. 25-46. London: Routledge.
21. Hymes, D. (1972) ‘On Communicative Competence’, in J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics, pp. 269-293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
22. Jacquemet, M. (1994) ‘T-offenses and Metapragmatic Attacks: Strategies of Interactional Dominance’, Discourse & Society 5: 297-319.
23. Jaworski, A. (1982) ‘A Note on the Types of Address Shift’, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 14: 259-266.
24. Jaworski, A. (1992) ‘The Vocative, First Name and the Pronoun ty in the Polish System of Address’, Bulletin de la Societé Polonaise de Linguistique 47/48: 95-104.
25. Jaworski, A. and Galasinski, D. (1998) ‘The Last Romantic Hero: Lech Walesa's Imagebuilding in TV Presidential Debates' TEXT 18: 525-544.
26. Jaworski, A. and Galasinski, D. (forthcoming) ‘Unilateral Norm-breaking in a Presidential Debate: Lech Walesa vs Aleksander Kwasniewski’, Research on Language and Social Interaction.
27. Keshavarz, M.H. (1988) ‘Forms of Address in Post-revolutionary Iranian Persian: A Sociolinguistic Analysis’, Language in Society 17: 565-575.
28. Levinson, S.C. (1988) ‘Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman's Concepts of Participation’, in P. Drew and A. Wootton (eds) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, pp. 161-227. Cambridge: Polity.
29. Maley, Y. (1994) ‘The Language of the Law’, in J. Gibbons (ed.) Language and the Law, pp. 11-50. London: Longman.
30. Malone, M.J. (1997) Worlds of Talk: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Conversation. Cambridge: Polity.
31. Miodek, J. (1991) Odpowiednie Dac Rzeczy Slowo [How We Use Language]. Warszawa.
32. Passent, D. (1988) ‘Pierwsze sliwki - robaczywki’ [Failed first effort], Polityka 50: 15-16. (10 December 1988).
33. Paulston, C.B. (1976) ‘Pronouns of Address in Swedish: Social Class Semantics and Changing System’, Language in Society 5: 359-386.
34. Pisarkowa, K. (1979) ‘Jak sie tytulujemy i zwracamy do drugich’ [How we title and address others], Jezyk Polski 69: 5-17.
35. Raciborski, J. (1997) Polskie wybory [Polish elections]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
36. Scotton, C.M. (1983) ‘The Negotiation of Identities in Conversation: A Theory of Markedness and Code Choice’, International Journal of Sociology of Language 44: 115-136.
37. Scotton, C.M. and Wanjin, Z. (1983) ‘Tóngzhì in China: Language Change and its Conversational Consequences’, Language in Society 12: 477-494.
38. Tannen, D. and Wallat, C. (1993) ‘Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview’, in D. Tannen (ed.) Framing in Discourse, pp. 57-76. New York: Oxford University Press. [Originally published in 1987 Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 205-216.]
39. Van Dijk, T.A. (1998) Ideology. London: Sage.
40. Zwicky, A.M. (1974) ‘Hey, Whatsyourname!’, Chicago Linguistic Society 10: 787-801.