Review essay: Change, continuity, and public opinion in youth justice

International Criminal Justice Review

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 340-349

  Minkes, John ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993812303     PISSN: 10575677     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1057567707310582     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.
2. Calverley, D. (2007). Youth custody and community services in Canada, 2004/05. Statistics Canada, 27(2). Available at http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/85-002-XIE/85-002-XIE2007002.htm.
3. Chairman of Youth Justice Board resigns condemning government policy. (2007). BBC Newsnight. Retrieved August 8, 2007, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2007/01_january/26/youth.shtml.
4. Chapman, B., Mirrlees-Black, C., & Brawn, C. (2002). Improving public attitudes to the criminal justice system: The impact of information (Home Office Research Study 245). London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
5. Doob, A., & Sprott, J. (2005). The use of custody under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Ottawa, Canada: Youth Justice Policy, Department of Justice. Available at http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/yj/research/doob-sprott/section1.html.
6. Doob, A., & Sprott, J. (2006). Punishing youth crime in Canada: The blind men and the elephant. Punishment & Society, 8(2), 223-233.
7. Drakeford, M., & Vanstone, M. (2000). Social exclusion and the politics of criminal justice: A tale of two administrations. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 369-381.
8. Hogeveen, B.R. (2005). If we are tough on crime, if we punish crime, then people get the message: Constructing and governing the punishable young offender in Canada during the late 1990s. Punishment & Society, 71, 73-89.
9. Home Office. (1990). The cautioning of offenders (Circular 59/90). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
10. Martinson, R. (1974, Spring). What works. Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, (5), 22-54.
11. Muncie, J. (2006). Repenalisation and rights: Explorations in comparative youth criminology. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(1), 42-70.
12. Muncie, J., & Goldson, B. (Eds.). (2006a). Comparative youth justice. London & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Muncie, J., & Goldson, B. (2006b). England and Wales: The new correctionalism. In J. Muncie & B. Goldson (Eds.), Comparative youth justice (pp. 34-47). London & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Roberts, J.V., & Hough, M. (2002). Public attitudes to punishment: The context. In J. V. Roberts & M. Hough (Eds.), Changing attitudes to punishment: Public opinion, crime and justice (pp. 1-14). Cullompton, UK and Portland, OR: Willan.
15. Schur, E.M. (1973). Radical non-intervention: Re-thinking the delinquency problem. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Smandych, R. (2006). Canada: Repenalization and young offenders’ rights. In J. Muncie & B. Goldson (Eds.), Comparative youth justice (pp. 19-33). London & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Statewatch. (2005). ASBOwatch: Monitoring the use of anti-social behaviour orders. Retrieved August 8, 2007, from http://www.statewatch.org/asbo/ASBOwatch.html.