The “Near Miss”: A Story of Relationship

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 591-607

  Tom, Allison ^a   Herbert, Carol P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993810439     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107780002237006     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alcoff, L., & Gray, L. (1993). Survivor discourse: Transgression or recuperation. Signs, 18(2), 260-290.
2. Bloom, L.R. (1998). Under the sign of hope: Feminist methodology and narrative interpretation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3. Duneier, M. (1999). Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
4. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, rep-resentations, and social responsibilities. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 107-132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Frisby, W., Crawford, S., & Dorer, T. (1997). Reflections on participatory action research: The case of low-income women accessing local physical activity services. Journal of Sport Management, 11, 8-28.
6. Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (2000). Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 85-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Gudeman, S., & Rivera, A. (1995). From car to house (del coche a la casa). American Anthropologist, 97, 242-250.
8. Haig-Brown, C., & Archibald, J. (1996). Transforming first nations research with respect and power. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9, 245-268.
9. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10. Hasan, H. (1999). Afterword. In M. Duneier, Sidewalk (pp. 319-330). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
11. Klein, B. (1997). Slow dance: A story of stroke, love and disability. Toronto, Canada: Knopf.
12. Maguire, P. (1993). Challenges, contradictions, and celebrations: Attempting participatory research as a doctoral student. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada (pp. 157-176). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
13. Martin, J.R. (1994). Methodological essentialism, false difference, and other dangerous traps. Signs, 19, 630-657.
14. Martin, J.R. (1996). Aerial distance, esotericism, and other closely related traps. Signs, 21, 584-614.
15. Mercier, L., & Murphy, M. (1991). Confronting the demons of feminist public history: Scholarly collaboration and community outreach. In S.B. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 175-188). London: Routledge.
16. Narayan, K. (1993). How native is a “native” anthropologist. American Anthropologist, 95(3), 671-686.
17. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
18. Olesen, V. (2000). Feminisms and qualitative research at and into the millennium. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 215-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Reid, C. (2000). Seduction and enlightenment in feminist action research. Resources for Feminist Research, 28(1 / 2), 169-188.
20. Rosaldo, R. (1988). Where objectivity lies: The rhetoric of anthropology. In J.S. Nelson (Ed.), The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
21. Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed.
22. Stacey, J. (1991). Can there be a feminist ethnography? In S.B. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 111-120). London: Routledge.
23. Tierney, W.G. (2000). Undaunted courage: Life history and the postmodern challenge. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 537-554). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Tom, A. (1996). Building collaborative research: Living the commitment to emergent design. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(3), 347-359.
25. Tom, A. (1997). The deliberate relationship: A frame for talking about faculty-student relationships. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 43(1), 3-21.
26. Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.
27. Wolf, D. (1996). Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In D. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 1-55). Boulder, CO: Westview.