Transcending the ‘natural’/‘contrived’ distinction: A rejoinder to ten Have, Lynch and Potter

Discourse Studies

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 543-548

  Speer, Susan A ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993808191     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/14614456020040041001     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Schegloff, E.A. (1991) ‘Reflections on Talk and Social Structure’, in D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, pp. 44–70. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. Speer, S.A. (2002) ‘What Can Conversation Analysis Contribute to Feminist Methodology? Putting Reflexivity into Practice’, Discourse & Society 13(6): 783–803.
3. Ten Have, P. (1999) Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.