On performance, productivity, and vocabularies of motive in recent studies of science

Feminist Theory

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 127-147

  Herzig, Rebecca ^a  

^a BATES COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

agency; performance; performativity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993804607     PISSN: 14647001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1464700104045404     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Amsterdamska, Olga (1990) ‘Surely You Are Joking, Monsieur Latour!’, Science, Technology, and Human Values 15(4): 495-504.
2. Anderson, Warwick (1992) ‘Securing a Brain: The Contested Meaningsof Kuru’, pp. 193-203 in Anne Harrington (ed.) So Human a Brain: Knowledge and Values in the Neurosciences. Boston: Birkhäuser.
3. Austin, J.L. (1970) ‘PerformativeUtterances’, pp. 233-252 in J.O. Urmson and G.J. Warnock (eds) Philosophical Papers. London: Oxford University Press.
4. Austin, J.L. (1975) How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Barad, Karen (1996) ‘Meeting the Universe Halfway: Realismand Social Constructivism without Contradiction’, pp.161-194 in Lynn Hankinson Nelson and Jack Nelson (eds) Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
6. Barad, Karen (1998) ‘Getting Real: Technoscientific Practices and the Materializationof Reality’, differences 10(2): 87-128.
7. Barad, Karen (2003) ‘Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of HowMatter Comes to Matter’, Signs 28(3): 801-832.
8. Bataille, Georges (1985) Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, trans. Allan Stoekl. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Bataille, Georges (1991) The Accursed Share: An Essay on General Economy,Volume I, Consumption, trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Zone Books.
10. Biagioli, Mario (1993) Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in theCulture of Absolutism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Biagioli, Mario (ed.) (1999) The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
12. Bordo, Susan (1993) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and theBody. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Braidotti, Rosi (1994) Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference inContemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Bray, Abigail and Claire Colebrook (1998) ‘The Haunted Flesh: Corporeal Feminism and the Politics of (Dis)Embodiment’, Signs 24(1): 35-67.
15. Brown, Norman O. (1991) Apocalypse and/or Metamorphosis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Burke, Kenneth (1969a) A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Burke, Kenneth (1969b) A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Bush, Marshall (1969) ‘Psychoanalysis and Scientific Creativity with Special Referenceto Regression in the Service of the Ego’, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 17: 36-90.
19. Butler, Judith (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion ofIdentity. New York: Routledge.
20. Butler, Judith (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York: Routledge.
21. Butler, Judith (1995) ‘Burning Acts: InjuriousSpeech’, pp. 197-227 in Andrew Parker and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (eds) Performativity and Performance. New York: Routledge.
22. Casper, Monica (1994) ‘Reframing and Grounding Human Agency: What Makes a Fetus an Agent?’, American Behavioral Scientist 37(6): 839-856.
23. Champagne, Roland (1998) Georges Bataille. New York: Twayne Publishers.
24. Cheah, Pheng (1996) ‘Mattering’, diacritics 26(1): 108-139.
25. Christie, J.R.R. (1993) ‘Aurora, Nemesis, and Clio’, British Journal for the History of Science 36(4): 391-405.
26. Cohen, Sande (1999) ‘Reading Science StudiesWriting’, pp. 84-94 in Mario Biagioli (ed.) The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
27. Foucault, Michel (1977) Discipline and Punish, trans. A.M. Sheridan. London: Allen Lande.
28. Foucault, Michel (1980) ‘Body/Power’, pp.55-62 in Colin Gordon (ed.) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Pantheon.
29. Freud, Sigmund (1962 [1910]) ‘Leonardo da Vinci and a Memory ofHis Childhood’, pp. 57-137 in TheStandard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud,vol. 11. London: The Hogarth Press.
30. Fuss, Diana (1989) Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature &Difference. New York: Routledge.
31. Gatens, Moira (1996) Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power, andCorporeality. London: Routledge.
32. Giovaccini, Peter (1960) ‘On Scientific Creativity’, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 8: 407-426.
33. Grosz, Elizabeth (1994) Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
34. Haraway, Donna (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the Worldof Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
35. Haraway, Donna (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention ofNature. New York: Routledge.
36. Haraway, Donna (1992) ‘The Promises of Monsters: A RegenerativePolitics for Inappropriate/d Others’, pp.295-337 in Lawrence Grossberg, Cary Nelson and Paula A. Treichler (eds) Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge.
37. Haraway, Donna (1997) Modest-Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™. New York: Routledge.
38. Haraway, Donna (2003) The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, andSignificant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
39. Hecht, Gabrielle (1998) The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and NationalIdentity after World War II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Hesford, Wendy S. and Wendy Kozol (eds) (2001) Haunting Violations: Feminist Criticism and theCrisis of the ‘Real’. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
41. Iliffe, Rob (1998) ‘Isaac Newton: Lucatello Professor ofMathematics’, pp. 121-155 in Steven Shapin and Christopher Lawrence (eds) Science Incarnate: Historical Embodiments of NaturalKnowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Inda, Jonathan Xavier (2000) ‘Performativity, Materiality, and the Racial Body’, Latino Studies Journal 11(3): 74-99.
43. Jasanoff, Sheila (2004) ‘Ordering Knowledge, OrderingSociety’, pp. 13-45 in Sheila Jasanoff (ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and SocialOrder. London: Routledge.
44. Jasanoff, Sheila, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen and Trevor Pinch (eds) (1995) Handbook of Science and TechnologyStudies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Johnson, Walter (2000) ‘The Slave Trader, the White Slave, and the Politics of RacialDetermination in the 1850s’, Journal of American History 87(1): 13-38.
46. Kanzer, Mark (1955) ‘The Reality-Testing of the Scientist’, Psychoanalytic Review 42: 412-418.
47. Keller, Evelyn Fox (1983) A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work ofBarbara McClintock. New York: W.H. Freeman.
48. Keller, Evelyn Fox (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
49. Kerin, Jacinta (1999) ‘The Matter at Hand: Butler, Ontology and the Natural Sciences’, Australian Feminist Studies 14(29): 91-104.
50. Kirby, Vicki (1997) Telling Flesh: The Substance of the Corporeal. New York: Routledge.
51. Kotz, Liz (1992) ‘The Body You Want: An Interview with Judith Butler’, Art forum 31(3): 82-89.
52. Kuhn, Thomas (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Latour, Bruno (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists andEngineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Latour, Bruno (1996) Aramis, or the Love of Technology, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Latour, Bruno (2000) ‘On the Partial Existence of Existing andNonexisting Objects’, pp. 247-269 in Lorraine Daston (ed.) Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar (1986 [1979]) Laboratory Life: The Construction of ScientificFacts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
57. Law, John (1994) ‘Technology and HeterogeneousEngineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion’, pp.111-139 in Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes and Trevor Pinch (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Law, John (1999) ‘After ANT: Complexity, Naming andTopology’, pp. 1-14 in John Law and John Hassard (eds) Actor-Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
59. Law, John (2000) ‘On the Subject of the Object: Narrative, Technology, and Interpellation’, Configurations 8(1): 1-29.
60. Law, John (2002) Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object inTechnoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
61. Law, John and Vicky Singleton (2000) ‘Performing Technology's Stories: On SocialConstructivism, Performance, and Performativity’, Technology and Culture 41(4): 765-775.
62. Lorand, Sándor (1934) ‘A Note on the Psychology of the Inventor’, Psychoanalytic Quarterly 3: 30-34.
63. Lynch, Michael (1995) ‘Springs of Action or Vocabularies ofMotive?’, pp. 94-113 in Penelope Gouk (ed.) Wellsprings of Achievement: Cultural and Economic Dynamics inEarly Modern England and Japan. Aldershot: Variorum.
64. Martin, Emily (1998) ‘Anthropology and the Cultural Study of Science’, Science, Technology, and Human Values 23(1): 24-44.
65. Mauss, Marcel (1954) The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in ArchaicSocieties. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
66. Mills, C. Wright (1963) ‘Situated Actions and Vocabularies ofMotive’, pp. 439-468 in Irving Louis Horowitz (ed.) Power, People, and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
67. Mol, Annemarie (1998) ‘Missing Links, Making Links: ThePerformance of Some Atheroschleroses’, pp.144-165 in Marc Berg and Annemarie Mol (eds) Differences in Medicine: Unraveling Practices, Techniques, andBodies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
68. Mol, Annemarie and John Law (2004) ‘Embodied Action, Enacted Bodies: TheExample of Hypoglycaemia’, published by the Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University[available at: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Mol-Law-Embodied-Action.pdf].
69. Nietzsche, Friedrich (1966) Thus Spake Zarathustra, trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Penguin.
70. Nietzsche, Friedrich (1969) On the Genealogy of Morals, trans. WalterKaufmann. New York: Vintage.
71. Nietzsche, Friedrich (1974) The Gay Science, trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage.
72. Nietzsche, Friedrich (1998) Twilight of the Idols, trans. Duncan Large. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Noble, David F. (1984) Forces of Production: A Social History of IndustrialAutomation. New York: Knopf.
74. Nussbaum, Martha C. (1999) ‘The Professor of Parody’, New Republic 220(8): 37-45.
75. Ortner, Sherry B. (1994) ‘Theory in Anthropology since theSixties’, pp. 372-411 in Nicholas B. Dirks, Geoff Eley and Sherry B. Ortner (eds) Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary SocialTheory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
76. Parker, Andrew and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (1995) Performativity and Performance. New York: Routledge.
77. Pickering, Andrew (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, andScience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
78. Prakash, Gyan (1999) Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of ModernIndia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
79. Ronell, Avital (1989) The Telephone Book: Technology - Schizophrenia -Electric Speech. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
80. Rouse, Joseph (1996) Engaging Science: How to Understand its PracticesPhilosophically. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
81. Rouse, Joseph (2002) How Scientific Practices Matter: ReclaimingPhilosophical Naturalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
82. Scott, Joan (1992) ‘Experience’, pp.22-40 in Judith P. Butler and Joan Wallach Scott (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge.
83. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky (1993) ‘Queer Performativity: Henry James’ The Art of the Novel’, GLQ 1(1): 1-16.
84. Shapin, Steven (1994) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science inSeventeenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85. Shapin, Steven (1998) ‘The Philosopher and the Chicken: On theDietetics of Disembodied Knowledge’, pp.21-50 in Steven Shapin and Christopher Lawrence (eds) Science Incarnate: Historical Embodiments of NaturalKnowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86. Shapin, Steven and Christopher Lawrence (1998) ‘Introduction: The Body ofKnowledge’, pp. 1-19 in Steven Shapin and Christopher Lawrence (eds) Science Incarnate: Historical Embodiments of NaturalKnowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
87. Sharpe, Ella Freeman (1934) ‘Similar and Divergent Unconscious Determinants Underlying theSublimations of Pure Art and Pure Science’, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 16: 186-202.
88. Sofia, Zoë (1993) Whose Second Self? Gender and (Ir)rationality inComputer Culture. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
89. Wilson, Elizabeth A. (1999) ‘Introduction: Somatic Compliance - Feminism, Biology, and Science’, Australian Feminist Studies 14(29): 7-19.