Extending DoDAF to Allow Integrated DEVS-Based Modeling and Simulation

The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 95-123

  Mittal, Saurabh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

bifurcated development process; DEVS; DoDAF; model continuity; operational view; simulation based design; SOA

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993782433     PISSN: 15485129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/875647930600300204     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. DoDAF Working Group. DoD Architecture Framework Version 1.0 Vol. III: Deskbook, DoD, Aug 2003.
2. DoD Instruction 5000.2., 2003 May 12.
3. Chairman, JCS Instruction 3170.01D. Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System; 2004 Mar 12.
4. Chairman, JCS Instruction 6212.01D. Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology and National Security Systems; 2006 Mar 8.
5. Atkinson K. Modeling and Simulation Foundation for Capabilities Based Planning. Simulation Interoperability Workshop; Spring 2004.
6. DoD Metadata Registry and Clearinghouse. [cited 2005 Jan 9]. Available from: htp://diides.ncr.disa.mil/mdregHomePage/mdregHome.portal
7. Dandashi F, Ang H, Bashioum C. Tailoring DoDAF to Support a Service Oriented Architecture. White paper; Mitre Corp.; Dec 2004.
8. Zeigler BP, Mittal S. Enhancing DoDAF with DEVS-Based System Life-Cycle Process. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics; Oct 2005; Hawaii; 2005.
9. Zeigler BP, Fulton D, Hammonds P, Nutaro J. Framework for M&S-Based System Development and Testing in Net-centric Environment. ITEA Journal; Nov 2005.
10. Zeigler BP, Praehofer H, Kim TG. Theory of Modeling and Simulation. Academic Press; 2000.
11. Hu X, Zeigler BP. Model Continuity in the Design of Dynamic Distributed Real-Time Systems. Accepted by IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man And Cybernetics- Part A: Systems And Humans; 2006.
12. Lee J, Choi M, Jang J, Park Y, Jang J, Ko B. The Integrated Executable Architecture Model Development by Congruent Process, Methods and Tools. The Future of C2, 10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Sysmposium.
13. Rosen JD, Parenti JL, Hamilton J. Cutting the Guardian Knot. In: The Domain of Interoperability in the US Department of Defense. Joint Command and Control Interoperability. Available from: htp://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/hamilton/security/spawar
14. DoD Architecture Framework Working Group 2004. DoD Architecture Framework Version 1.0, Volume 1. Definitions and Guidelines; 2004 Feb 9; Washington, D.C.
15. Wagenhals LW, Haider S, Levis AH. Synthesizing Executable Models of Object Oriented Architectures. Workshop on Formal Methods Applied to Defense Systems; Jun 2002; Adelaide, Australia.
16. Sarjoughian HS, Cellier FE, editors. Discrete Event Modeling and Simulation Technologies: A Tapestry of Systems and AI-Based Theories and Methodologies. New York: Spring-Verlag; 2001.
17. Zeigler BP. DEVS Today: Recent Advances in Discrete Event-Based Information Technology. MASCOTS Conference 2003.
18. ACIMS Software Development website. [cited Jan 2005]. Available from: htp://www.acims.arizona.edu/SOFWARE/sofware.shtml
19. Sarjoughian H, Zeigler B, Hall S. A Layered Modeling and Simulation Architecture for Agent-Based System Development. In: Proceedings of the IEEE. 2001; 89 (2): 201–213.
20. Cho Y, Zeigler BP, Sarjoughian HS. Design and Implementation of Distributed Real-Time DEVS/CORBA. IEEE Sys. Man. Cyber. Conference; Oct 2001; Tucson, AZ.
21. Kim KH, Kang WS. A Web Services-based Distributed Simulation Architecture for Hierarchical DEVS Models. AIS Conference; Oct 2004; Jeju, Korea.
22. Kim K, Seong Y, Kim T, Park K. Distributed Simulation of Hierarchical DEVS Models: Hierarchical Scheduling Locally and Time Warp Globally. Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation International. 1996; 13 (3): 135–154.
23. Kim K, Kang W. CORBA-based, Multi-threaded Distributed Simulation of Hierarchical DEVS Models: Transforming Model Structure into a Non-Hierarchical One. LNCS. 2004; 3046: 167–176.
24. Davis KP, Anderson AR. Improving the Composability of Department of Defense Models and Simulations; RAND Technical Report (Appendix D); 2003.
25. Shelton GS, Case R, DiPalma LP, Nash D. Advanced Software Technologies for Protecting America. CrossTalk: Journal of Defense Software Engineering; May 2004. Available from: htp://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/2004/05/0405shelton.html
26. Mital S, Gupta A, Mitra A, Zeigler B. Strengtheing OV-6a Semantics with Rule-Based Meta-models in DEVS/DoDAF-based Life-Cycle Architectures Development. IEEE-Information Reuse and Integration, Special Section on DoDAF; Sep 2006; Hawaii; 2006.
27. Levis A, Wagenhals L. C4ISR Architectures I. Developing a Process for C4ISR Architecture Design. System Architectures Lab, C3I Center, MSN 4D2; Geroge Mason University; Jul 2000.
28. Tolk A, Muguira JA. M&S with the Model Driven Architecture. I/ITSEC: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference; 2004.
29. Tolk A, Solick S. Using the C4ISR Architecture Framework as a Tool to Facilitate V&V for Simulation Systems Within the Military Application Domain. Simulation Interoperability Workshop; Spring 2003.
30. Adshead S, Kreitmair T, Tolk A. Definition of ALTBMD Architectures by Applying the C4ISR Architecture Framework. Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop; Orlando, FL; 2001.
31. Zinn AW. The Use of Integrated Architectures to Support Agent Based Simulation: An Initial Investigation. MS Thesis; AFIT/GSE/ENY/04-M01; Air Force Institute of Technology (AU), Wright-Paterson AFB, OH; Dec 2004
32. Gonzales D, Moore L, Pernin C, Matonick D, Dreyer P. Assessing the Value of Information Superiority for Ground Forces-Proof of concept. RAND; 2001.
33. Wagenhals L, Shin I, Kim D, Levis A. C4ISR Architectures: II. A Structured Analysis Approach for Architecture Design. Journal of Systems Engineering. 2000; 3 (4).
34. htps://cao.hanscom.af.mil/af-cio.htm
35. Mital S, Zeigler BP, Hammonds P, Veena M. Network Simulation Environment for Evaluating and Benchmarking HLA/RTI Experiments. JITC Report; Fort Huachuca; Dec 2004.
36. Mital S, Zeigler BP. Dynamic Simulation Control with Queue Visualization. SCSC'05: Summer Computer Simulation Conference; Jul 2005; Philadelphia, PA.
37. Hu X, Zeigler BP, Mital S. Dynamic Configuration in DEVS Component-Based Modeling and Simulation. SIMULATION: Transactions of the Society of Modeling and Simulation International. Nov 2003.
38. Mital S, Zeigler BP. Modeling/Simulation Architectures for Autonomous Computing. Autonomic Computing Workshop: The Next Era of Computing; Jan 2003.
39. Curbera F, Dufler M, Khalaf R, Nagy W, Mukhi N, Weerawarana S. Unraveling the Web services web: an introduction to SOAP, WSDL, and UDDI. IEEE Internet Computing. 2002; 6(2 Mar-Apr): 86–93.
40. Mak E. Automating Testing Using XML and DEVS. University of Arizona; Spring 2006. Available from: htp://www.acims.arizona.edu/PUBLICATIONS/publications.shtml#MSPHDReports
41. Kobryn C, Sibbald C. Modeling DoDAF Compliant Architectures: The Telelogic Approach for complying with DoD Architectural Framework. Telelogic White Paper; Oct 2004.
42. Dickerson C, Soules S. Using Architecture Analysis for Mission Capability Acquisition. 2002. Available from: htp://www.dodccrp.org/events/2002/CCRTS_Monterey/Tracks/pdf/123.pdf#search=%22Dickerson%20Soules%20Mission%22
43. Integration Definition Methods. IDEF3 Process Description Capture Method. Available from: htp://www.idef.com/IDEF3.html
44. Mital S, Mak E, Nutaro J. DEVS-Based Dynamic Simulation Control and Reconfiguration in Enhanced DoDAF Design Process. JDMS To be published 2006; 3 (4).
45. Mital S, Martin JLR. DEVS Modeling Language (DEVSML). Available from: htp://devsml.sourceforge.net