The nature and value of formative assessment for learning

Improving Schools

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 7-22

  Black, Paul ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993767953     PISSN: 13654802     EISSN: 14757583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/136548020300600304     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ARG (2002) Testing, Motivation and Learning University of Cambridge School of Education: Assessment Reform Group.
2. Black P., Wiliam D (1998a) Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–71.
3. Black P., Wiliam D. (1998b) Inside the Black Box: raising standards through classroom assessment London: School of Education, King’s College.
4. Black P., Wiliam D. (1998c) Inside the Black Box: Raising standards through classroom assessment Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
5. Black P. J., Harrison C., Lee C., Marshall B., Wiliam D (2002) Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. London, UK: King’s College London School of Education.
6. Black P., Harrison C., Lee C., Marshall B., Wiliam D. (2003). Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
7. Butler R. (1987). Task-Involving and Ego-Involving Properties of Evaluation: Effects of Different Feedback Conditions on Motivational Perceptions, Interest and Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 474–482.
8. Butler R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation; the effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58 1–14.
9. Butler J. (1995). Teachers Judging Standards in Senior Science Subjects: Fifteen Years of the Queensland Experiment. Studies in Science Education, 26, pp. 135–157.
10. Craven R. G., Marsh H. W., Debus R. L. (1991). Effects of Internally Focused Feedback on Enhancement of Academic Self-Concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 (1), 17–27.
11. Dweck C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist (Special Issue: Psychological science and education), 41 (10), 1040–1048.
12. Foos P. W., Mora J. J., Tkacz S. (1994). Student Study Techniques and the Generation Effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 (4), 567–576.
13. King A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27 (1), 111–126.
14. Kluger A. N., DeNisi A. (1996). The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 254–284.
15. Newman R. S., Schwager M. T. (1995). Students’ Help Seeking During Problem Solving: Effects of Grade, Goal, and Prior Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 32 (2), 352–376.
16. Perrenoud P. (1991). Towards a pragmatic approach to formative evaluation, in: Weston P.,(Ed. ) Assessment of Pupils Achievement: Motivation and School Success, pp. 79–101. (Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger).
17. Rowe M.B (1974) Wait time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic and fate control. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11 81–94.
18. Sadler R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18 119–144.
19. Sadler R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education 5(1), 77–84.
20. Wiliam D., Lee C., Harrison C., Black P. (2003). Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement. Submitted for publication.