Managing the Unmanageable: The Politics of Cultural Planning

Public Policy and Administration

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 101-113

  Gray, Clive ^a  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993767892     PISSN: 09520767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/095207670602100208     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Audit Commission (2005), Audit Commission Key Lines of Enquiryfor Service Inspections: Culture, www.audit-commission.gov.uk/kloe/downloads/KLOECulture.doc, accessed 25th April 2006.
2. Belfiore, E. (2004), ‘Auditing Culture: The Subsidised Cultural Sector in the New Public Management’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol 10, pp. 183-202.
3. Belfiore, E. and Bennett, O. (2006),Rethinking the Social Impact of the Arts (paper to the Fourth International Conference on Cultural Policy Research, Vienna).
4. Bianchini, F. (1996), ‘Cultural Planning: an Innovative Approach to Urban Development’, in J. Verwijnen and P. Lehtovuori (eds), Managing Urban Change, (Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki), pp. 18-25.
5. Bulpitt, J. (1983), Territory and Power in the United Kingdom, (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
6. Cowling, J. (2004), For Art's Sake: Society and the Arts in the 21st Century, (London: Institute for Public Policy Research).
7. Department for Culture, Media and Sport (1999 a), Local Cultural Strategies, (London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport).
8. Department for Culture, Media and Sport (1999 b), Regional Cultural Consortiums, (London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport).
9. Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2000), Creating Opportunities, (London: DCMS).
10. Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2004), Guidance on Integrating Cultural and Community Strategies, (London: DCMS).
11. Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2005), Autumn Performance Report, Cm 6721, (London: DCMS).
12. Dwyer, M. and Frankel, S. (2002), Policy Partners: Making the Case for State Investments in Culture, www.culturalpolicy.org/pdf/policypartners.pdf, accessed 11th May, 2006.
13. Evans, G. (2001), Cultural Planning, (London: Routledge).
14. Evans, G. and P. Shaw (2004), The Contribution of Culture to Regeneration in the UK, (London: London Metropolitan University).
15. Everitt, A. (1999), The Governance of Culture: Approaches to Integrated Cultural Planning and Policies, (Strasbourg: Council of Europe).
16. Ghilardi, L. (2005), Culture at the Centre, (Glasgow: National Cultural Planning Steering Group).
17. Gray, C. (2000), The Politics of the Arts in Britain, (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
18. Gray, C. (2001), ‘Selling the Arts: Centre-Periphery Tensions in Commodification Processes’, in J. Home (ed.), Leisure Cultures, Consumption and Commodification, (Eastbourne: Leisure Studies Association), pp.53-63.
19. Gray, C. (2002), ‘Local Government and the Arts’, Local Government Studies, Vol 28, No 1, pp. 77-90.
20. Gray, C. (2004), ‘Joining Up or Tagging On?: The Arts, Cultural Planning and the View From Below’, Public Policy and Administration, Vol 19, No 2, pp. 38-49.
21. Gray, C. (2006), ‘Commodification and Instrumentality in Cultural Policy’, (paper to the Fourth International Conference on Cultural Policy Research, Vienna).
22. Greater London Council (1985), The State of the Art or the Art of the State?, (London: Greater London Council).
23. Griffiths, R. (1993), ‘The Politics of Cultural Policy in Urban Regeneration Strategies’, Policy and Politics, Vol 21, pp. 39-46.
24. Holden, J. (2004), Capturing Cultural Value: How Culture Has Become a Tool of Government Policy, (London: Demos).
25. IDeA (2004), Cultural Connections: Cultural Services and Better Public Service Delivery, (London: Improvement and Development Agency).
26. Jowell, T. (2004), Government and the Value of Culture, (London: DCMS).
27. Long, J. and Bramham, P. (2006), ‘Joining Up Policy Discourses and Fragmented Practices: the Precarious Contribution of Cultural Projects to Social Inclusion?’, Policy and Politics, Vol 34, No 1, pp. 133-151.
28. Madden, C. and Bloom, T. (2004), ‘Creativity, Health and Arts Advocacy’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol 10, pp. 133-156.
29. Minihan, J. (1977), The Nationalization of Culture, (London: Hamish Hamilton).
30. Myerscough, J. (1988), The Economic Importance of the Arts, (London: Policy Studies Institute).
31. Pratt, C. (2005), ‘Cultural Industries and Public Policy: an Oxymoron?’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol 11, pp. 31-44.
32. Ruiz, J. (2004), A Literature Review of the Evidence for Culture, the Arts and Sport Policy, (Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Education Department).
33. Scottish Executive (2006 a), Quality of Life and Well-being: Measuring the Benefits of Culture and Sport A Literature Review, (Edinburgh: Education Department Research Programme Research Findings No. 12).
34. Scottish Executive (2006 b), Scotland's Culture: Scottish Executive Response on the Cultural Review, http://www.scotland.gov/publications/2006/01/18091052/0, accessed 27th April, 2006.
35. Stevenson, D. (2004),” ‘Civic Gold” Rush: Cultural Planning and the Politics of the Third Way’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol 10, pp. 119-131.
36. Throsby, D. (2001), Economics and Culture, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
37. Williams, R. (1976), Keywords, (Glasgow: Fontana).
38. Wolf, R. (2002), Poems for the Waiting Room: An Evaluation, www. Hyphen21.org/projects/content/pwr/FullPWREvaluationReportGeneric.pdf, accessed 20th April 2006.
39. Wright, S. (1998), ‘The Politicization of Culture’, Anthropology Today, Vol 14, No 1, pp. 7-15.