Beyond Foucault: Toward a user-centered approach to sexual harassment policy

Technical Communication Quarterly

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 9-28

  Ranney, Frances J ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993726397     PISSN: 10572252     EISSN: 15427625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10572250009364683     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adler, Paul S., and A. Winograd, Terry, eds. 1992. “The Usability Challenge.”. In Usability: Turning Technologies into Tools., 3-14. New York: Oxford UP.
2. Adler, Robert S., and R. Peirce, Ellen. 1993. “The Legal, Ethical, and Social Implications of the ‘Reasonable Woman’ Standard in Sexual Harassment Cases.”. Fordham Law Review, 61: 773-827.
3. American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Profession. 1992. Lawyers and Balanced Lives: A Guide to Drafting and Implementing Sexual Harassment Policies for Lawyers., Chicago: ABA.
4. Blyler, Nancy Roundy. 1994. “Habermas, Empowerment, and Professional Discourse.”. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3: 125-45.
5. Brenneman, Deborah S., 1992. “From a Woman's Point of View: The Use of the Reasonable Woman Standard in Sexual Harassment Cases.”. Cincinnati Law Review, 60: 1281-306.
6. Brooks, Linda, and R. Perot, Annette. 1994. “Reporting Sexual Harassment: Exploring a Predictive Model.”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15: 31-47.
7. Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 1987. Sexual Harassment: Employer Policies and Problems., Washington: BNA Inc.
8. Bush, Corlann Gee. 1983. “Women and the Assessment of Technology: To Think, To Be, To Unthink, To Free.”. In Machina Ex Dea: Feminist Perspectives on Technology., Edited by: Rothschild, Joan. 151-70. New York: Pergamon.
9. Carr v. Allison Gas Turbine Division. 32 Fed. Rep. 3rd Ser. 1007. 7th Cir. 1994
10. Crain, Karen A., and A. Heischmidt, Kenneth. 1995. “Implementing Business Ethics: Sexual Harassment.”. Journal of Business Ethics, 14 n. pag
11. Dobrin, David. 1983. “What's Technical about Technical Writing?”. In New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice., Edited by: Anderson, Paul V., Brockmann, R. John, and Miller, Carolyn R., 227-50. Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
12. Ellison v. Brady. 924 Fed. Rep. 2d Ser. 8712. 9th Cir. 1991
13. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 1980. “Guidelines on Sexual Harassment.”. In Code of Federal Regulations 29, 1604-11. Washington: GPO.
14. Foucault, Michel. 1988. “Confinement, Psychiatry, Prison.”. In Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings 1977-1984., Edited by: Kritzman, Laurence D., Sheridan, Alan, and others. New York: Routledge.
15. Foucault, Michel. 1972. “The Discourse on Language.”. In The Archeology of Knowledge., Edited by: Smith, A. M. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon.
16. Foucault, Michel. 1978. History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction., Edited by: Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage.
17. Foucault, Michel. 1984. “What Is an Author?”. In The Foucault Reader., Edited by: Rabinow, Paul. 101-20. New York: Pantheon.
18. Gilsdorf, Jeanette W., 1998. “Organizational Rules on Communicating: How Employees Are—and Are Not—Learning the Ropes.”. The Journal of Business Communication, 35: 173-201.
19. Gurak, Laura J., and L. Bayer, Nancy. 1994. “Making Gender Visible: Extending Feminist Critiques of Technology to Technical Communication.”. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3: 257-69.
20. Hengehold, Laura. 1994. “An Immodest Proposal: Foucault, Hysterization, and the ‘Second Rape.’”. Hypatia, 9: 88-107.
21. Henson v. City of Dundee. 682 Fed. Rep. 2d Ser. 897. 1982
22. Herrick, Jeanne Weiland. 1999. ‘"And then She Said’: Office Stories and What They Tell Us about Gender in the Workplace.”. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13: 274-96.
23. Johnson, Robert R., 1998. User-Centered Technology: A Rhetorical Theory for Computers and Other Mundane Artifacts., Albany: SUNY P.
24. Kelly, Kathleen, and Weaver, Natalie Taylor. 1997. “A Heuristic for Generating and Organizing the Strategy or Policy Report.”. Business Communication Quarterly, 60: 31-40.
25. Kimble, Joseph. 1992. “Plain English: A Charter for Clear Writing.”. Cooley Law Review, 9: 1-58.
26. Letwin, Shirley R., 1991. “Law and the Unreasonable Woman.”. The National Review, 43.21 Nov.: 34-38.
27. MacKinnon, Catharine A., 1991. “Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination.”. In Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender., Edited by: Bartlett, Katharine T., and Kennedy, Rosanne. 81-94. Boulder, CO: Westview.
28. Martin, Wanda, and Sanders, Scott. 1994. “Ethics, Audience, and the Writing Process: Bringing Public Policy Issues into the Classroom.”. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3: 147-63.
29. McShulskis, Elaine. 1998. “Sexual Harassment Complaints on the Rise.”. HR Magazine, 43 Feb.: 28
30. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson. 477. U.S. Sup. Ct. 57. 1986
31. Miller, Carolyn R., 1984. “Genre as Social Action.”. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70: 151-67.
32. Miller, Carolyn R. 1979. “A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing.”. College English, 40.6: 610-17.
33. Miller, Carolyn R. 1989. “What's Practical about Technical Writing?”. In Essays in Advanced Technical Communications., Edited by: Fearing, Bertie C., and Sparrow, W. Keats. 1-20. New York: MLA P.
34. National Underwriter Company. 1995. Property and Casualty/Risk and Benefits Management Edition, 99 n. pag
35. Nobile, Robert J., 1994. Guide to Employee Handbooks., Boston: Warren Gorham & Lamont.
36. Posner, Richard A., 1988. Law and Literature: A Misunderstood Relation., Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
37. Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co. 805 Fed. Rep. 2d Ser. 611. 6th Cir. 1986
38. Radford, Michelle F., 1994. “By Invitation Only: The Proof of Welcomeness in Sexual Harassment Cases.”. North Carolina Law Review, 72: 499-548.
39. Ramazanoglu, Caroline. 1993. “ Introduction ”. In Up Against Foucault: Explorations of Some Tensions between Foucault and Feminism., Edited by: Ramazanoglu, Caroline. 1-25. NY: Routledge.
40. Ranney, Frances J., 1998. “Posner on Legal Texts: Law, Literature, (Economics), and ‘Welcome Harassment.’”. College Literature, 25: 163-83.
41. Rentz, Kathryn C., 1989. “Literary Genre Theory and the Teaching of Professional Writing Forms.”. Technical Writing Teacher, 16: 196-208.
42. Riger, Stephanie. 1993. “Gender Dilemmas in Sexual Harassment: Policies and Procedures.”. In American Women in the Nineties: Today's Critical Issues., Edited by: Matteo, Sherri. Boston: Northeastern UP.
43. Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. 760 Fed. Supp. 1486. Mid. Dist. Fla. 1991.
44. Rude, Carolyn D., 1995. “The Report for Decision Making: Genre and Inquiry.”. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 9: 170-205.
45. 1996. “Sexual Harassment at Work 2: Developing Policies and Procedures.”. London: IRS Employment Review. N. pag
46. 1984. “Sexual Harassment Claims of Abusive Work Environment under Title VII.”. Harvard Law Review, 97: 1449-67.
47. Slack, Jennifer Daryl, Miller, David James, and Doak, Jeffrey. 1993. “The Technical Communicator as Author: Meaning, Power, Authority.”. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7: 12-36.
48. Smart, Carol. 1995. Law, Crime and Sexuality: Essays in Feminism., London: Sage.
49. Staton v. Maries County. 868 Fed. Rep. 2d Ser. 996. 8th Cir. 1989.
50. Sullivan, Dale L., 1990. “Political-Ethical Implications of Defining Technical Communication as a Practice.”. Journal of Advanced Composition, 10: 375-86.
51. 1994. “Terms of Harassment.”. Time, 6 Jun. n. pag.
52. Williams, Joan C., 1991. “Deconstructing Gender.”. In Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender., Edited by: Bartlett, Katharine T., and Kennedy, Rosanne. 95-123. Boulder, CO: Westview P.
53. Winner, Langdon. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology., Chicago: U of Chicago P.