The Effects of Accommodations on Performance Assessments

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 261-267

  Johnson, Evelyn S ^a  

^a Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993724972     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/074193250002100502     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Center for Policy Research on the Impact of General and Special Education Reform. (1996). Standards-based school reform and students with disabilities. Alexandria, VA: Office of Special Education Programs.
2. Fisher, D., Roach, V., & Kearns, J. (1998). Statewide assessment systems: Who's in and who's out? Policy, Research, Practice Issue Brief 3(1), Consortium for Inclusive Schooling Practices.
3. Kimball, K., Olson Brown, S., & Johnson, E. (1999). Creating accommodations policy: How hard is it? Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington.
4. Koretz, D. (1997). The assessment of students with disabilities in Kentucky. Los Angeles: CRESST/ RAND Institute on Education and Training.
5. McLaughlin, M., & Shepard, L. (1996). Improving education through standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, Panel on Standards-Based Education Reform.
6. Phillips, S.E. (1994). High-stakes testing accommodations: Validity versus disabled rights. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 93-120.
7. Sharp, L. (1996). Assessment policy as it impacts special populations: Modifications and accommodations in student assessment. Seattle: University of Washington, Institute for the Study of Educational Policy.
8. Thurlow, M., Erickson, R., Spicuzza, R., Vieburg, K., & Ruhland, A. (1996). Accommodations for students with disabilities: Guidelines from states with graduation exams. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
9. Thurlow, M., Ysseldyke, J., Erickson, R., & Elliot, J. (1997). Increasing the participation of students with disabilities in state and district assessments. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
10. Tindal, G. (1998). Models for understanding test comparability in accommodated testing. Eugene: University of Oregon State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards.
11. Tindal, G., Heath, B., Hollenbeck, K., Almond, P., & Harniss, M. (1998). Accommodating students with disabilities on large-scale tests: An experimental study. Exceptional Children, 64, 439-450.
12. Ysseldyke, J., & Thurlow, M. (1994). Guidelines for inclusion of students with disabilities in large-scale assessments. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
13. Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., & Bruininks, R. (1992). Expected educational outcomes for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 13(6), 19-30.
14. Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., & Geenan, K. (1994). Educational accountability for students with disabilities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.