Editorial: Social Identity Processes in Organizations

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 185-189

  van Knippenberg, Daan ^a   Hogg, Michael A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993723077     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430201004003001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abrams, D., Ando, K., & Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers’ turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1027-1039.
2. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1998). Prospects for research in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 7-20.
3. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
4. Brewer, M. B. (1995). Managing diversity: The role of social identities. In S. Jackson & M. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 47-68). New York: American Psychological Association.
5. Brown, R., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286.
6. Brown, R. J. (1978). Divided we fall: An analysis of relations between sections of a factory workforce. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 395-429). London: Academic Press.
7. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
8. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
9. Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (in press). Social identity and the link between leadership and followership: How affirming an ingroup identity translates personal vision into group action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
10. Haslam, S. A., Powell, C., & Turner, J. C. (2000). Social identity, self-categorization and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organizational outcomes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 319-339.
11. Haslam, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M. J., & Ellemers, N. (Eds.). (in prep.). Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
12. Hogg, M. A. (in press). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
13. Hogg, M. A., Hains, S. C., & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248-1263.
14. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
15. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2001). Social identity processes in organizational contexts. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
16. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156.
17. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
18. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48, 309-333.
19. Moreland, R. L., Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.
20. Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577-594.
22. Tajfel, H. (1972). Social categorization. English manuscript of ‘La catégorisation sociale’. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la Psychologie Sociale (Vol. 1, pp. 272-302). Paris: Larousse.
23. Terry, D. J., & Callan, V. J. (1998). In-group bias in response to an organizational merger. Group Dynamics, 2, 67-81.
24. Tsui, A., Egan, T., & O’Reilly, C. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
25. Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 201-246.
26. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups. Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
27. van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 357-371.
28. van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., Monden, L., & de Lima, F. (in press). Organizational identification after a merger: A social identity perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology.
29. van Knippenberg, D., & van Leeuwen, E. (2001). Organizational identity after a merger: Sense of continuity as the key to post-merger identification. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.