Data Capture from the Sponsors' and Investigators' Perspectives: Balancing Quality, Speed, and Cost

Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 871-886

  Lampe, Amy J ^a   Weiler, John M ^a  

^a CompleWare Corporation ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Data capture; Diary card; Electronic case report form (eCRF); Interactive voice response; Internet; Investigative site; Remote data entry; Scannable forms

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993720600     PISSN: 21684790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009286159803200403     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. McFadden ET LoPresti F Bailey LR, et al Approaches to data management. Control Clin Trials. 1995; 16: 30S–65S.
2. Reynolds-Haertle RA McBride R. Single vs. double data entry in CAST. Control Clin Trials. 1992; 13: 487–494.
3. Blumenstein BA. Verifying keyed medical research data. Stat Med. 1993; 12: 1535–1542.
4. Hosking JD Newhouse MM Bagniewska A, et al Data collection and transcription. Control Clin Trials. 1995; 16: 66S–103S.
5. Zhang J Hu W. Single or double data entry: considerations based on a simple binomial model. Control Clin Trials. 1998; 19: 56–58.
6. Day S Fayers P Harvey D. Double data entry: what value, what price? Control Clin Trials. 1998; 19: 15–24.
7. Buchholz K Ascoli D. The value of computer-assisted data review in the clinical development process. Drug Inf J. 1997; 31: 635–638.
8. Pimazzoni M. Global data management: a winning approach to clinical data processing. Drug Inf J. 1998; 32: 569–571.
9. Daniel DA Nanjo-Jones N Kirwin J, et al Outsourcing management in the pharmaceutical industry: the early stages at four United States companies. Drug Inf J. 1997; 31: 111–118.
10. Electronic records; electronic signatures. Federal Register. 1997; 62: 13429–13466.
11. Fitzmaurice JM. Health care data standards are required for medically effective use of workstations. Int J Biomed Comput. 1994; 34: 331–334.
12. McDonald CJ Overhage JM Dexter P, et al A framework for capturing clinical data sets from computerized sources. Ann Int Med. 1997; 127: 675–682.
13. Doherty JB. A new international perspective–the application of the principles of GLP to computerized systems (OECD 1995). Drug Inf J. 1997; 31: 883–888.
14. Schadow G Föhring U Tolxdorff Implementing HL7: from the standard's specification to production application. Meth Inform Med. 1998; 37: 119–123.
15. Stokes T. Computer systems validation (6 part series). Appl Clin Trials. September 1996, January 1997, February 1997, April 1997, June 1997, August 1997.
16. Hogan WR Wagner MM. Free-text fields change the meaning of coded data. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996; 517–521.
17. Higgins SB Jiang K Plummer WD Jr., et al Pivot/Remote: a distributed database for remote data entry in multi-center clinical trials. Medinfo. 1995; 8 Pt 2: 1097.
18. Lister J Budin-Jones S Palmer J, et al How accurate are asthma diary cards? Thorax. 1989; 44: 343P.
19. Chowienczyk PJ Lawson CP Morris J, et al Electronic diary to record physiological measurements. Lancet. 1992; 339: 251.
20. Hyland ME Kenyon CAP Allen R, et al Diary keeping in asthma; comparison of written and electronic methods. Br Med J. 1993; 306: 487–489.
21. Chowienczyk PJ Parkin DH Lawson CP, et al Do asthma patients correctly record home spirometry measurements? Br Med J. 1994; 309: 1618.
22. Tiplady B Crompton GK Brackenridge D. Electronic diaries for asthma. Br Med J. 1995; 310: 1469.
23. Tiplady B Crompton GK Dewar MH, et al The use of electronic diaries in respiratory studies. Drug Inf J. 1997; 31: 759–764.
24. Kobak KA Greist JH Jefferson JW, et al Computer-administered clinical rating scales. A review. Psychopharmacol. (Berl) 1996; 127: 291–301.
25. Papaconstantinou C Krischer JP. An automated patient registration and treatment randomization system. J Med Syst. 1995; 19: 445–456.
26. Lawson ME Brown PM Shostak L. Results of a data imaging pilot project. Drug Inf J. 1997; 31: 193–196.
27. Diener-West M Connor PB Newhouse MM, et al Feasibility of keying data from screen-displayed facsimile images in an ongoing trial: the collaborative ocular melanoma study. Control Clin Trials. 1998; 19: 39–40.
28. Weiler JM Meltzer EO Benson PM, et al A dose-ranging study of the efficacy and safety of azelastine nasal spray in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis with an acute model. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1994; 94: 972–980.
29. Meltzer EO Weiler JM Widlitz MD. Comparative outdoor study of the efficacy, onset and duration of action, and safety of cetirizine, loratadine, and placebo for seasonal allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996; 97: 617–626.
30. Shiffman RN Brandt CA Freeman BG. Transition to a computer-based record using scannable, structured encounter forms. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997; 151: 1247–1253.
31. Kohane IS Greenspun P Fackler J, et al Building national electronic medical record systems via the world wide web. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 1996; 3: 191–207.
32. Kiuchi T Ohashi Y Konishi M, et al A world wide web-based user interface for a data management system for use in multi-institutional clinical trials–development and experimental operation of an automated patient registration and random allocation system. Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17: 476–493.
33. Afrin LB Kuppuswamy V Slater B, et al Electronic clinical trial protocol distribution via the world-wide web: a prototype for reducing costs and errors, improving accrual, and saving trees. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 1997; 4: 25–35.
34. Halamka JD Szolovits P Rind D, et al A WWW implementation of national recommendations for protecting electronic health information. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 1997; 4: 458–464.
35. Hogan WR Wagner MM. Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 1997; 4: 342–355.
36. Sullivan E Gorko MA Stellon RC. A statistically-based process for auditing clinical data listings. Drug Inf J. 1997; 31: 647–4553.